Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Key US Senate panel puts off Supreme Court vote
AFP via Brietbart ^ | 07/13/2010 | Staff

Posted on 07/13/2010 8:40:37 AM PDT by OldDeckHand

US President Barack Obama's Republican foes on Tuesday forced a largely symbolic one-week delay in a key Senate panel's vote on his second US Supreme Court pick, Elena Kagan.

The US Senate Judiciary Committee will now take up the nomination on July 20, when the panel is set to send it to the full Senate for all-but-certain confirmation as just the fourth woman to reach the highest US court.

The justices serve lifetime terms as the final arbiters of the US Constitution, setting precedents for all US courts and adjudicating bitter disputes, often in narrow 5-4 rulings that can take a generation to reverse.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: confirmation; court; kagan; senate
The longer this plays out, the better for the GOP.
1 posted on 07/13/2010 8:40:39 AM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

How?


2 posted on 07/13/2010 8:47:07 AM PDT by whatisthetruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

We can pray something happens between now and then to derail this thing. I can’t even begin to stomach the thought of kagan on this court. Maybe the pubbies found something they need to delve further in to that will turn this around.
Yeah. I’m dreaming. I know.


3 posted on 07/13/2010 8:47:52 AM PDT by MestaMachine (De inimico non loquaris sed cogites- Don't wish ill for your enemy; plan it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine

Kagan simply stinks. A handful of brave GOP senators need to filibuster this nominee. The more people learn about this leftist, the worse her poll numbers are. She is wildly unqualified in terms of experience. Even in the academic world of the Sixties, Kagan would have been lucky to receive tenure since she has done so little — her entire career is predicated upon radical feminism that came to pass a decade later.


4 posted on 07/13/2010 8:51:30 AM PDT by PBRCat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

//The longer this plays out, the better for the GOP//

Maybe the tide will turn against her. I can only hope, because if she gets in it will be a genuine travesty for the constitution.


5 posted on 07/13/2010 8:54:22 AM PDT by valkyry1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand
Another nail in Obama’s coffin.
6 posted on 07/13/2010 8:56:33 AM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

“The final arbiters of the U.S. Constitution” are the people.


7 posted on 07/13/2010 9:02:54 AM PDT by Genoa (Titus 2:13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whatisthetruth

We are getting played. The GOP is trying to make it look like a “struggle” while they figure out just how many Senators they can free-up to vote “nay” while maintaining their precious Senate Comity.


8 posted on 07/13/2010 9:04:05 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

“and Republicans have shown no sign they plan to use parliamentary delay tactics that require 60 votes to break.”

This witch needs to be FILIBUSTERED!!

If they won’t try to block her, Obama could nominate the Reverend Wright to SCOTUS and get away with it.

SEE:

http://judiciary.senate.gov/about/members.cfm

SNED THE GOP MEMBERS LETETERS. E-MAILS AND PHONE CALLS!!

They ALL need an infusion of Courage and some not-too tender exhortations to filibuster her appointment.


9 posted on 07/13/2010 9:04:50 AM PDT by ZULU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

“and Republicans have shown no sign they plan to use parliamentary delay tactics that require 60 votes to break.”

This witch needs to be FILIBUSTERED!!

If they won’t try to block her, Obama could nominate the Reverend Wright to SCOTUS and get away with it.

SEE:

http://judiciary.senate.gov/about/members.cfm

SNED THE GOP MEMBERS LETTERS. E-MAILS AND PHONE CALLS!!

They ALL need an infusion of Courage and some not-too tender exhortations to filibuster her appointment.


10 posted on 07/13/2010 9:05:02 AM PDT by ZULU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whatisthetruth
Two reasons. First, the closer this gets to the election, the more political pressure will be felt by the Dems in states where the 2nd Amendment is important, to especially include AR and VA. Second, there are still hundreds of thousands of documents that have yet to be released - some from Obama, but many from the Clinton Library. The longer the GOP staffers have time to find their smoking gun, the better chance they'll have of actually finding it.

If Orin Hatch is a "no" vote, that puts a lot of pressure on other moderate Republicans. Collins, Snowe and Brown are sure-bet "yes" votes. That means the GOP has to pick up a few Dems if they want to be able to filibuster. They need that 2A smoking gun.

11 posted on 07/13/2010 9:07:48 AM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

McConnell needs to be fired if he can’t rein in these 3 rogue Republicans. I’m surprised they voted against the Health Bill, there seems to be nothing Republican about any of them.


12 posted on 07/13/2010 9:13:39 AM PDT by whatisthetruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

Just a question for all of the participants on this thread.

When was the last time you saw a brand new president get to name two Supreme Court justices in his first 18 months in office?


13 posted on 07/13/2010 9:43:26 AM PDT by Philo1962 (Iraq is terrorist flypaper. They go there to die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Philo1962
"When was the last time you saw a brand new president get to name two Supreme Court justices in his first 18 months in office?"

Nixon came VERY close, and perhaps may have matched this feat. He certainly appointed three in his first term: Burger, Blackman and Powell, with Rehnquist being installed in his 2nd term (I think, although that might have been a 1st Term pick, too).

Eisenhower picked a bunch as well - maybe as many as six. And of course, FDR was the most prolific.

14 posted on 07/13/2010 9:50:21 AM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Philo1962

Bill Clinton.


15 posted on 07/13/2010 9:51:07 AM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll protect your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand; Philo1962

Burger and Blackmun were both confirmed by May 197. Blackmun was Nixon’s third choice for Fortas’s vacancy; he had nominated Clement Haynsworth back in May 1969, so Nixon made nominations for two SCOTUS vacancies in his first six months in office.

And Clinton appointed Ginsburg in 1993 and Breyer in May 1994 (he was confirmed in early August).


16 posted on 07/13/2010 9:59:24 AM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll protect your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican
"Nixon made nominations for two SCOTUS vacancies in his first six months in office."

Thanks for the information. I had also forgotten about Clinton's two appointees. For some reason, I thought Breyer came after the mid-terms, but apparently not.

17 posted on 07/13/2010 10:22:52 AM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

Had Breyer come after the midterms, the confirmation hearings would have been a lot more interesting. : )

Clinton was lucky to get his two vacancies in 1993 and 1994 when his party still controlled the Senate (they would lose control a few months later), and G.W. Bush was lucky to get his two vacancies in 2005 when the GOP had just increased its Senate majority to 53 seats (and before President Bush became unpopular and the Democrats could smell blood).


18 posted on 07/13/2010 10:45:08 AM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll protect your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: whatisthetruth

Traitors, all of them and McConnell sucks.


19 posted on 07/13/2010 1:09:00 PM PDT by mojitojoe (When crisis becomes opportunity, crisis becomes the goal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson