Skip to comments.
Geert Wilders to take anti-Islam party global
The First Post ^
| 16 July 2010
| Eliot Sefton
Posted on 07/16/2010 9:45:23 AM PDT by Palter
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-77 next last
1
posted on
07/16/2010 9:45:26 AM PDT
by
Palter
To: Palter
Oh, yeah. Great thinking Geert. As an expert in American politics it is the right thing to split the vote in a 2 party system. /sarc
Stupid Dutch. Language sounds like a fart in a bathtub anyway.
2
posted on
07/16/2010 9:48:28 AM PDT
by
Mere Survival
(The time to fight was yesterday but now will have to do.)
To: Palter
3
posted on
07/16/2010 9:48:34 AM PDT
by
mancini
To: Palter
Islamophobic I hate propaganda "journalists". Anyone who isn't "Islamophobic" is retarded.
4
posted on
07/16/2010 9:48:55 AM PDT
by
ROCKLOBSTER
(Who allowed the worst oil pollution disaster in American history and did nothing?)
To: Palter
Reacting to Wilders yesterday, Ayhan Tonca, a well-known spokesman for Dutch Muslims, said he feared Wilders would meet with success as he spread his Islamophobic message. "So long as things are going badly with the economy, a lot of people always need a scapegoat," he said, calling on "well-meaning people in Europe to oppose this". How long until we hear Ayhan Tonca has sawed his wife's head off for looking at him wrong or some such thing?
5
posted on
07/16/2010 9:49:42 AM PDT
by
xjcsa
(Ridiculing the ridiculous since the day I was born.)
To: Palter
“his Islamaphobic party”
Every time you don’t like something now, you are “-phobic.”
I guess it’s just not possible to oppose something. You have to be afraid of it.
6
posted on
07/16/2010 9:56:01 AM PDT
by
Persevero
(Homeschooling for Excellence since 1992)
To: Palter
Now Wilders, who is under constant 24-hour protection because of his incendiary public statements on Islam Do Dutch words have some boomerang effect where if someone says them they can swing around and cause physical injury to the speaker? Or is the author too scared to say that Muslims don't like what he is saying and might kill Wilders too because of their hatred?
7
posted on
07/16/2010 9:58:58 AM PDT
by
KarlInOhio
(Gun control was originally to protect Klansmen from their victims. The basic reason hasn't changed.)
To: Palter
he is forming international alliances to launch branches of his Islamophobic party across the Western world. I don't see them refer to Islam as "freedom-phobic" or "civilization-phobic" but they should.
Opposing totalitarianism isn't a phobia. Its what you do if you love freedom and you aren't completely gutless.
8
posted on
07/16/2010 9:59:57 AM PDT
by
marron
To: Persevero
Not just fear, but an irrational fear. I guess we are teaching children carophobia when we tell them not to play on the interstate because they will likely be run over.
9
posted on
07/16/2010 10:00:29 AM PDT
by
KarlInOhio
(Gun control was originally to protect Klansmen from their victims. The basic reason hasn't changed.)
To: KarlInOhio
Personally, I think most of the powers that be are suffering from Christophobia.
10
posted on
07/16/2010 10:02:13 AM PDT
by
Persevero
(Homeschooling for Excellence since 1992)
To: Palter
I’d like to see an honest and intellectually rigorous movement aimed at the destruction of Islam worldwide. Other religions can all peacefully coexist side by side, but Islam is not capable of this.
I’ve got no quarrel with most Muslims themselves, but they are shackled to a false and culturally cancerous faith that must be stopped. It’s us or them.
11
posted on
07/16/2010 10:03:21 AM PDT
by
Ramius
(Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
To: Palter
Might have some use in countries with systems that allocate representatives by the percentage of the vote. It will do little in the USA except to be a fly trap for federal law enforcement who view any perceived "radical" group to be a threat.
I'm sure that the tea party, minutemen and other organizations are riddled with LEOs. So much for true freedom of assembly.
To: Palter
Wilders accuses Islam of being violent and, coincidentally, apparently unrelated, has to be guarded 24 hours a day to keep him from being murdered by muslims.
Its his own fault for accusing them of being violent. Violence is not inherent in Islam; if you don’t oppose them they usually won’t murder you. Or in any case not that many of you.
13
posted on
07/16/2010 10:05:38 AM PDT
by
marron
To: Palter
Sorry to go against the grain, but anti-Islamism will not be effective. The crusades have already been tried. They didn't work. Charles Martel fought the Islamics off in Tours, but they are now streaming into Paris. Jefferson sent the USMC to fight them on the shores of Tripoli, but they are building mosques at ground zero in New York.
I suggest something much more simple. Encourage people to commit their lives to Jesus Christ and then teach them witness to muslims. Make Islamics into disciples who also follow Jesus Christ, get them baptized and teach them to spread the good news. It works everytime it is tried.
14
posted on
07/16/2010 10:05:59 AM PDT
by
Guyin4Os
(A messianic ger-tsedek)
To: Mere Survival
As an expert in American politics it is the right thing to split the vote in a 2 party system. /sarcWhich part is the sarc tag for, being an expert or splitting the vote? Or both?
You are either with Islam or against it, there is no middle, moderate, or turning the other cheek. Islam will have it's religious war.
To: existtoexcel
Both. Splitting the conservative vote with some dutch party is stupid.
16
posted on
07/16/2010 10:12:14 AM PDT
by
Mere Survival
(The time to fight was yesterday but now will have to do.)
To: Palter
He hasn’t hardly achieved anything in The Netherlands yet. Why doesn’t he focus there instead?
17
posted on
07/16/2010 10:16:12 AM PDT
by
PGR88
To: Palter
...says he is forming international alliances to launch branches of his Islamophobic party across the Western world. Was American considered Naziphobic during WWII?
18
posted on
07/16/2010 10:16:27 AM PDT
by
Cowboy Bob
(Liberalism and Patriotism cannot coexist.)
To: Ramius
Well said, Ramius. Islam is a totalitarian political ideology masquerading as a religion.
The first thing we need to do is legally strip Islam of first amendment protection because it is not a religion. Then we need to ban the practice of Islam because it is a anti-constituional attempt to strip away the foundations of republican institutions guaranteed to each state by the US Constitution.
Islam under Sharia Law is the modern day equivalent of totalitarian communism and needs to be treated as such. Of course, none of this will happen until the Muslums take over a political jurisdiction in this country and start honor killing, Jews, women and homos and engage in forced conversion they way they did to Fox News reporter Centani a few yrs ago!
19
posted on
07/16/2010 10:22:17 AM PDT
by
mick
(Central Banker Capitalism is NOT Free Enterprise)
To: Palter
Geert is 100% right on about t he fascist part. Where do I sign up?
20
posted on
07/16/2010 10:22:56 AM PDT
by
Candor7
(Obama .......yes.......is fascist... ...He meets every diagnostic of history)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-77 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson