Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Builders are working on the railroad
The Columbian ^ | Saturday, July 24, 2010 | Erik Robinson

Posted on 07/25/2010 11:06:27 AM PDT by Willie Green

Land is being cleared, leveled for new bypass track in Vancouver

Excavators are eating into a slope above BNSF Railway’s main line in the Fruit Valley neighborhood.

The work is to prepare the site for a 3.2-mile-long set of bypass tracks designed to help ease a railroad chokepoint in Vancouver. The new line will run along the east side of the BNSF main line from downtown Vancouver all the way to the Fruit Valley Road overpass.

Contractors demolished two old houses on the west-facing slope last week.

BNSF is contracting to do the earthwork north of the 39th Street overpass, which will replace a bumpy grade-level crossing over seven sets of tracks in west Vancouver. The $11.6 million overpass also will accommodate the new bypass track paralleling the east edge of the railway’s yard.

The entire $150 million project is due to be finished in 2013.

The Washington Department of Transportation is overseeing the project, which taps state and federal funding.

State officials believe it will also qualify for federal economic stimulus funding for high-speed passenger rail, although a specific allocation has not yet been awarded.

Officials say the bypass tracks, along with a slew of other improvements planned by the city and the Port of Vancouver, ultimately will free up space to accommodate projected increases in freight traffic while improving the speed and on-time reliability of passenger trains. The state plans to add two Amtrak Cascades trains to the four daily round-trip journeys currently operating between Portland and Seattle.

The Vancouver project is among several along the BNSF main line in Western Washington.

“It’s a necessary piece to make the program work,” said David Smelser, project delivery manager for the DOT’s high-speed rail program. “Vancouver’s a step toward that.”

The laying of track won’t occur until after right-of-way has been acquired between 39th Street and the southern end of the bypass near 8th Street in downtown Vancouver. However, BNSF crews and contractors began excavating the slope north of 39th Street last month.

“BNSF and WashDOT both recognized this dirt’s going to have to move at some point,” Smelser said.

Railway spokesman Gus Melonas said engineering and surveying actually began in September. Twenty-five graders, excavators and heavy trucks are scooping dirt along the hillside, he said.

Some of that material is being trucked to the Port of Vancouver, where contractors are filling and leveling a new site for light-industrial expansion on the former Rufener farm in the Vancouver Lake lowlands.

Rail feeding ships

In fact, the port is in the midst of a rail-enhancement program of its own.

The port recently finished a $14.2 million set of loop tracks at the site of the former Alcoa aluminum smelter, which the port acquired two years ago. The 35,000 feet of track can easily accommodate mile-long unit trains without clogging the BNSF main line.

Port officials believe they are well-positioned for growth.

The port already handles 16 percent of all American wheat exports, and officials foresee growing demand in Asia for agricultural products such as beef, corn and soybeans. Much of those products will logically arrive in Vancouver via Union Pacific and BNSF main lines extending across the northern tier of the United States, through the Columbia River Gorge.

“Rail is really key for us,” said Curtis Shuck, the port’s economic development director. “We are located on a more efficient route from the agricultural-producing states.”

To that end, the port anticipates spending a total of $137 million in rail projects, roughly tripling the port’s capacity to 160,000 rail cars per year.


TOPICS: US: Washington
KEYWORDS: amtrak; freight; govtwaste; trains

1 posted on 07/25/2010 11:06:31 AM PDT by Willie Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ilvwJREmJm0


2 posted on 07/25/2010 11:11:37 AM PDT by Clintonfatigued (Obama's more worried about Israelis building houses than he is about Islamists building atomic bombs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
Great. $137 million on 1850's transportation technology that doesn't improve it, just makes it bigger. Of course, you can't jump a jet plane like you can a freight train.
3 posted on 07/25/2010 11:14:49 AM PDT by downtownconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

I am for his speed rail of a specific kind.

The interstate highway system of the 50’s and 60’s would be a fairly good model to follow.

If high speed rail was developed to connect cities of 200 mi (+or-) miles and eliminated the demand for commuter jets, it would help unemployment, make energy consumption more efficient, and be a long term benefit to the economy.

Provisions would have to be made for the commuter airlines (that would go away) to permit them ground floor access.

But, a nation whose major cities were connected by trains that traveled 200-250+ miles per hour would be the next frontier ( putoff the moon/mars stuff for awhile.)


4 posted on 07/25/2010 12:10:09 PM PDT by burroak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
The lack of a bypass track at Vancouver Yard has slowed down both freight and passenger trains for years because freight yards require a much lower "yard limit" for all trains traversing the yard.

Vancouver Yard has always been a bottleneck because of the way the line that goes south and crosses the Columbia River into Oregon intersects with the line that goes east along the Columbia into Eastern Washingotn and Idaho.

Freight trains get held up for long periods of time at that yard, and passengers trains are forced to go 30 mph through a location where they could be doing 79.

This has been in the works for years, and it's going to be a godsend for BNSF and UP freight trains.

5 posted on 07/25/2010 1:14:36 PM PDT by Publius (Unless the Constitution is followed, it is simply a piece of paper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: burroak

Agreed, and if the “central planners” had any sense the rails would be electrified and powered with nuclear reactors.

Watch the diesels run over the continental divide on the southern lines for an example of how inefficient we have become.

Even though Global warming is a hoax, or thousands of years wrong, we could reduce oil consumption in ten years with a little effort. Should be private systems though and yes, the airlines would squawk and so will Harry Reid when they open Yucca Flat. But I can dream.


6 posted on 07/25/2010 1:56:48 PM PDT by KC_for_Freedom (California engineer and ex-teacher (ret))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: burroak
eliminated the demand for commuter jets, it would help unemployment

What about all the people who (used to) work for the commuter airlines? And why would people abandon those airlines for trains? Just askin'.

7 posted on 07/25/2010 2:18:25 PM PDT by BfloGuy (It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker, that we can expect . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: burroak
If high speed rail was developed to connect cities of 200 mi (+or-) miles and eliminated the demand for commuter jets, it would help unemployment, make energy consumption more efficient, and be a long term benefit to the economy.
Provisions would have to be made for the commuter airlines (that would go away) to permit them ground floor access.

I don't think that it's possible to eliminate demand for commuter airlines.

But I would be in favor of eliminating the misnamed Essential Air Service subsidy to those community airports that would be better served by a rail line.

8 posted on 07/25/2010 2:20:02 PM PDT by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

Commuter airlines are very inefficient energy wise and time wise.

The cost of lifting that thing in the air and hurling it 200 miles is staggering compared to rolling the same stuff along smooth rails.

The great advantage for rail are the terminals (downtown to downtown). The travel time to the airport, the 2 hr lead time for security, the transportation from your destination airport, cost of limo, cab, or shuttle, etc. It goes on and on.

Flying commuter jets is like being born with a headache, you don’t know how bad it was until it stops hurting.


9 posted on 07/25/2010 3:11:40 PM PDT by burroak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson