Posted on 07/25/2010 12:21:02 PM PDT by Libloather
Police: No comment about Gore interview
Investigation might be completed soon
By Jim Redden
The Portland Tribune
Jul 24, 2010, Updated 3.2 hours ago
Portland police are not commenting on reports that detectives have interviewed former Vice President Al Gore about accusations that he molested a Portland masseuse in 2006.
Bureau spokesperson Det. Mary Wheat refused to confirm or deny reports that detectives interviewed Gore on Thursday. The National Enquirer, which first broke the story about the allegations, reports the interview took place in San Francisco. The tabloid did not cite any sources for the report or say what Gore supposedly told the detectives. Several blogs have repeated the claim.
"We do not comment on ongoing investigations," Wheat told the Portland Tribune.
Wheat also declined to speculate about when the investigation will be completed. At the same time, she suggested it could be finished soon.
"The chief has said he wants it wrapped up quickly, and we have assigned the resources to the investigation to do so," Wheat said.
Molly Hagerty claims Gore molested her in a downtown Portland hotel in October 2006. Several months after the alleged encounter, she had a lawyer contact the police on her behalf. She then canceled three interviews with the police. Her lawyer subsequently told the police Hagerty would pursue the case civilly.
(Excerpt) Read more at portlandtribune.com ...
Interviewed in San Francisco?
Where? A Castro bathhouse?
“insufficient evidence”
In other words, “sufficient payoffs”
BIG AL! Keep, looking for that global warming sunshine pu$$y!s/
Can’t imagine that Al hasn’t been getting his second chakra released by bullied masseuses and subordinates for the past thirty years. Seems like he had a regular routine. Tipper was probably the last to know. Looking back over his career this behavior is consistent with his often erratic past actions whether it was his kooky stalking of Bush during debates or his insane global warming powerpoint presentations. Historians will piece together video footage of Gore and wonder how such an unstable nut got so close to the White House.
After reading about Climategate, I thought all that global warming was in Al Gore’s head.
Turns out it was in his shorts instead!
The investigation ran into stiff opposition.
The evidence would never stand up in court.
After losing the erection, Algore asked for a recount.
I wonder if he rolled his eyes and sighed.
Was she born with that name or did she earn it.
Only Algore knows for sure. Hey, to him, she might be a "babe".
Uh, oh - poster update - one man, THREE masseuses. (Or is that masseese?)
Uh oh, update, actually a-week-ago date
Re: your collective Al Gore Sex Poodle sensational tabloid claims:
The simple fact is that the one accuser who was finally identified, Ms. Hagerty:
failed a polygraph that a prospective attorney ordered to back up her contentions;
three other attorneys said pass;
Had a record of molestation or attack claims, couldnt get a restraining order after the first story because the judge didnt buy her story
Missed six police appointments at last count, to make charges for those various claims
she went for the gold instead of stopping a sexual predator from attacking others, by either civil or criminal charge;
held up a pair of pants on the cover of the Enquirer insisting that it was The Proof! of semen, when she already knew the results of the test (ranch dressing);
Neither she nor the Enquirer admits that they never produced the evidence that at least 5 million paid to see, yet these dozens of sensational articles all cite that evidence! Thats quite a trick.
And now two anonymous women, whose stories cant be checked by any of the reporters much less the accusers names are being paraded about as if THEY now are the proof
You add all this up and you conclude — in the latest rage blog concoction — that he entered an LLC, like thousands of other Americans, thus THAT is proof that he attacked the first one, whose story is falling apart faster than one of his glaciers?
Al Gore has so many legitimate goofs and bombast, especially his movie, that deserve scorn and criticism. You and thousands of others are unfortunately making fools out of yourself drawing conclusions from the Enquirer, which has still not produced evidence that can be verified, but now has introduced two anonymous sensational claims.
My French is very limited due my personal choices.
So I don’t know!:)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.