Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: StAnDeliver
Silver lining - this is as close as you can get to the model test case for the Supreme Court.

I don't know about that. Judge Napolitano, who is usually pretty accurate, thinks Kennedy would vote with the liberals on this one. Kennedy previously voted with them to invalidate a Colorado law that interfered with gay rights.

100 posted on 08/04/2010 2:43:09 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]


To: BuckeyeTexan
I don't know about that. Judge Napolitano, who is usually pretty accurate, thinks Kennedy would vote with the liberals on this one. Kennedy previously voted with them to invalidate a Colorado law that interfered with gay rights.

Kennedy went out of his way to exclude marriage from the holding in Lawrence. Given how horribly written this opinion is, he would have to be a complete activist detached from reality to uphold it. The opinion is that bad.

104 posted on 08/04/2010 2:44:26 PM PDT by freedomwarrior998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

The Colorado law did not interfere with gay “rights” I was here at the time. It merely prevented assigning gays protected class status.


262 posted on 08/04/2010 5:04:19 PM PDT by Mom MD (Jesus is the Light of the world!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Yep. I think SCOTUS is going to kill the ban.

Marriage is a legal institution, not a religious one. It’s a legal one because we have to go down to the courthouse to get a marriage license. The courthouse is a government building of the judicial branch of government. It is not a house of god. Ever wonder how athiests get married? They don’t go to church. They dont ask a priest. They go to the courthouse and get married by a judge or a Justice of the Peace. The courts dont give a damn about religious traditions or what religious texts say.

The only thing that is going to stop this is a constitutional amendment. And considering all the other problems facing the country, gay marriage is not going to be a very high priority on the minds of voters.


336 posted on 08/05/2010 5:33:23 AM PDT by jerry557
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan
I don't know about that. Judge Napolitano, who is usually pretty accurate, thinks Kennedy would vote with the liberals on this one. Kennedy previously voted with them to invalidate a Colorado law that interfered with gay rights.

True, but in CA's case, Prop 8 was a constitutional change, not simply a passed law.

339 posted on 08/05/2010 5:57:03 AM PDT by ScottinVA (The West needs to act NOW to aggressively treat its metastasizing islaminoma!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson