New campaign is demanding 'gay' Prop 8 judge be booted

WND ^ | August 04, 2010 | Bob Unruh

[RobinMasters]

An openly homosexual federal judge in California ignored a warning from the state's own Supreme Court about the coming chaos of polygamy and incest if same-sex "marriages" are established to enjoin enforcement of the state's constitutional definition of marriage as being between one man and one woman only – and now he is being targeted by an impeachment campaign.

Judge Vaughn Walker, who openly has lived a homosexual lifestyle, yesterday issued an order that the state could not enforce its own constitutional requirement that marriage is between members of the opposite sex only.

The ruling from Walker said, "race and gender restrictions shaped marriage during eras of race and gender inequality, but such restrictions were never part of the historical core of the institution of marriage. Today, gender is not relevant to the state in determining spouses' obligations to each other…

"Gender no longer forms an essential part of marriage," Walker said.

[bunkerhill7]

The Gay Fallacy:

Argument 1.

Marriage defined, connoted, and denoted since time immemorial in all societies is between a man and a woman, usually in a religious context.

Marriage can also be defined as matrimony, wedded, connubial, from 'nubere', to marry - all define marriage to be between a man and a woman

Ergo marriage was and is defined as a religious and social contract between opposite sexes. Married couples were defined and designated as husband and wife since time immemorial in all societies.

In order to change the definition of (1) marriage, one has to redefine:

2. troth
3. betrothed
4. betrothal
5. engagement
6. fiance'
7. fiancee'
8. Wedding
9. Matrimony
10. connubial
11. conjugal

Thus the term Gay "marriage" does not coincide with nor is inclusive with 10 other definitions pertaining to the definition and etymology of the word 'marriage' and its 10 critical connective historical synonyms and meanings above.

To change the meaning and definition of 11 words etymologically and indisputably set in stone for centuries is to attempt to re-write history.

This is revisionist fiction and propaganda.

To rewrite the dictionary, not to add new words, but to attempt to change the etymological basis and usage of 11 words is a crime, a fraud, a fiction, a prevarication, a lie, a con, a sham, a perjury before all courts who define the truth, evidence the truth and persecute its distorters.

To attempt to change the evidence of language and its meanings is a perjury punishable before any court.

Only recently in the last 500 years has marriage been defined as an act requiring a government "license", always between a man and a woman.

Argument 2.

All marriages between men and women usually, in most cases, produce offspring or have the potential to produce offspring unless a natural defect precludes such.
No gay can have a natural biological gay parent[s].
The gay "marriage" result is no natural children.
Ergo Gay "marriage" cannot have a natural family.

Argument 3.
Real marriages usually produce offspring.
Gay "marriages" cannot reproduce natural offspring.

Argument 4.

Gay "marriage" cannot have a natural family.
Ergo gay "marriage" appears to be non-natural family.

Fact: Real defined marriage is the foundation of all societies.
Fact: Societies cannot exist and perpetuate posterity without real marriages, common-law and lawful.
Fact: Gay "marriages" cannot perpetuate posterity societies.
Gay "marriage" appears to be non-societal.
Ergo gay marriage cannot be a social contract because it is non-societal.

Gay "marriage" appears to be an oxymoron.
Thus gay "marriage" appears to be an aberration of normal society.
Gay "marriage" appears to usurp the social word 'marriage' and its real meaning, definition and purpose for its own aberrated non-social purpose.

Conclusion: Gay "marriages" cannot perpetuate themselves naturally in society [Argument 4.]
Gay "marriages" are dependent upon real marriages for new members in order to perpetuate future gay "marriages".
Thus real marriage is superior to gay "marriage".
Ergo, Because real marriage is superior to gay "marriage, the former and the later are unequal.

If the real marriage and gay "marriage" are not equal in FACT, they cannot be equal under the law.

Gay "marriage" is merely an impostor of real marriage because it cannot be inclusive of the 11 above words synonymous with the word 'marriage'.

Therefore there cannot be equal protection under the law for gay "marriages" because gay "marriage" is inferior to real marriage, merely in an impostor of real marriages and cannot be treated as genuine and equal to real marriage under the same jurisprudence determinations.

Gay "marriage" seeks to redefine 11 marriage words in the dictionary, but must rely upon the actual living real marriage in order to survive through societal posterity..

This is akin to the quack trying to practice medicine, calling himself a doctor, but rushing to the real doctor every time the quack is sick. verbum sat.