It seems like the socialist media is giving BO’s/BS’s ineligibility issue more coverage. I’m not sure what that portends.
How can they convict if 0bama refuses to show his birth certificate during discovery?
Sad to see delusional crazies who can’t accept the president’s legitimacy leading a brave soldier astray.
“Lakin has said he refused to deploy to Afghanistan until he sees proof that President Obama was born in the U.S.”
Is that really Lakin’s issue? Because that is irrelevant. What’s more relevant is the citizen status of his parents and then becoming an Indonesian citizen.
With the current “documentation” a judge can “prove” Hawaiian birth in a trice.
Seems like a straw man setup.
Fact: Obama has gone to considerable effort and spent tax dollars and his own to prevent the release of the common documents that would prove ( or disprove) his natural born status.
Fact: A natural born president would be **HONORED** to promptly prove ( with the **best** evidence) to any soldier or citizen that he was indeed natural born and eligible to be president and Commander in Chief.
Conclusion: That Obama has treated military officers and citizens in the manner that he has, strongly indicates that he is a usurper.
Translation: The Lt Col did more during any random 5 minutes of his career than the Obamaloon has accomplished during his hole tawdry life.
Oh boy! Another meme article by CNN.
In his video he distinctly states he questions his status as a natural born citizen!
0:58..."Any reasonable person, looking critically at the evidence currently in the public domain, would have questions about President Obama's claim to be a natural born citizen." The troubling, but compelling information, that calls into question whether President Obama is a natural born citizen, as our Constitution requires him to be for him to hold the highest office, has gone unanswered because he refuses to release his original birth certificate dating from 1961 and bearing the signature of the doctor who delivered him.
The Doctor has more balls than any General in office. The Generals should be ashamed of them selves.
Especially when sending that man into a combat zone?
And if Obama fails to do so with this man - how many other people would Obama be willing to destroy with refusing to simply show his bc... 5, 10, 100, 500, 10,000, 500,000???
Look at the millions of dollars Obama has spent.
WTF is he hiding?
Seriously now - WTF is he hiding??
Not that it matters to anyone, but I believe that ObommieDaCommie was born in Honolulu, but his birth father was NOT a citizen of the USA so Barry is not eligible to be POTUS!
It's very sad that the birther fruitcakes were able to dupe a brave man like Larkin into supporting their cause.
The charges and specifications that were filed against LTC Lakin......
887. ART. 87. MISSING MOVEMENT
Any person subject to this chapter who through neglect or design misses the movement of a ship, aircraft, or unit with which he is required in the course of duty to move shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.
CHARGE I, VIOLATION OF THE UCMJ. ARTICLE 87
The Specification: In that Lieutenant Colonel Terrence L. Lakin, US Army, did, at or near Arlington, Virginia, on or about 12 April 2010, through design, miss the movement of US Airways Flight Number 1123, departing from Baltimore/Washington International Airport arriving in Charlotte, North Carolina, in order to deploy for a Temporary Change of Station in support of Operation Enduring Freedom with the 32nd Calvary Regiment, 101st Airborne Division (Air Assault), Fort Campbell, Kentucky, with which he was required in the course of duty to move.
********
892. ART. 92. FAILURE TO OBEY ORDER OR REGULATION
Any person subject to this chapter who—
(1) violates or fails to obey any lawful general order or regulation;
(2) having knowledge of any other lawful order issued by any member of the armed forces, which it is his duty to obey, fails to obey the order; or
(3) is derelict in the performance of his duties; shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.
CHARGE II, VIOLATION OF THE UCMJ . ARTICLE 92
Specification 1: In that Lieutenant Colonel Terrence L. Lakin, US Army, having knowledge of a lawful order issued by Lieutenant Colonel William Judd, to report to the office of his Brigade Commander, Colonel Gordon R. Roberts, at 1345 hours, or words to that effect, an order which it was his duty to obey, did, at or near Arlington, Virginia, on or about 31 March 2010, fail to obey the same by wrongfully not reporting as directed.
Specification 2: In that Lieutenant Colonel Terrence L. Lakin, US Army, having knowledge of a lawful order issued by Colonel Gordon R. Roberts, to wit: a memorandum signed by the said Colonel Gordon R. Roberts, dated 31 March 2010, an order which it was his duty to obey, did, at or near Arlington, Virginia, on or about 31 March 2010, fail to obey the same by wrongfully not reporting as directed.
Specification 3: In that Lieutenant Colonel Terrence L. Lakin, US Army, having knowledge of a lawful order issued by Colonel Peter M. McHugh, to wit: Temporary Change of Station orders 099-17, dated 9 April 2010, issued by Colonel Peter McHugh, requiring the said Lieutenant Colonel Terrence L. Lakin to report to Fort Campbell, Kentucky not later than 1500 hours on 12 April 2010, an order which it was his duty to obey, did at or near Washington, District of Columbia, on or about 12 April 2010, fail to obey the same by wrongfully failing to report to 32nd Calvary Regiment, 101st Airborne Division (Air Assault), Fort Campbell, Kentucky.
Specification 4: In that Lieutenant Colonel Terrence L. Lakin, US Army, who knew or should have known of his duties at or near Washington, District of Columbia, on or about 12 April 2010, was derelict in the performance of those duties in that he willfully failed to report to Fort Campbell, Kentucky in accordance with Temporary Change of Station orders 099-17, dated 9 April 2010, issued by Colonel Peter McHugh, in support of Operation Enduring Freedom, as it was his duty to do.
IMHO the Secretaries of State, electors and congress have put this fine officer in a terrible position by not doing their jobs.
The person with standing who should be in court refusing to ‘follow orders’ and basing it upon Obama’s illegitimacy is anyone affected by a law signed by Obama. A tax law, or any other that Obama has signed.
In other words- any of us.
Of course it is not lawful to obey an unlawful order from your immediate superior, or his immediate superior, etc... all the way up the command to the one who initiated the order.
But whether these specific orders originated, technically, from the president is doubtful.
I would assume that would include any and all orders that he himself has given?
Did we ever get a satisfactory answer regarding whether or not Obama has used more than one Social Security number?
BY LINDA BENTLEY | JUNE 2, 2010
Still seeking an explanation for Obama’s SSN 042-68-4425
The SSA neither issues Connecticut SSNs to Hawaiian residents nor does it ‘recycle’ dead people’s SSNs
http://www.sonorannews.com/archives/2010/100602/frntpg_ObamaSSN.html
Who uses phony Social Security numbers? – Jon Christian Ryter
Mar 22, 2010
http://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/100419.html