Posted on 08/08/2010 3:05:37 PM PDT by GVnana
I am serious, their was a time when some Dems were rational, put America 1st, on Foreign and sometimes domestic policy, heck you would even want to have a beer with them.
This crowd? They make Bernie Sanders look like Ronald Reagan.
He is right, though, I think Boehner tipped his hand (dumb ass) when he said they may pick up 100 seats. BTW, 103 give us veto proof majority.
The Senate is what scares me, I can see us picking up 9 or 10 but we still have the evil step sisters of Maine and Gramesty and the Brown disappointment....
I agree.
Boehner is a spaz and he really needs to go the f away.
We need to do everything possible to rid ourselves of the RINOs as well.
We all have Dems to outright Markist in our social circles, but I am willing to loose some friends and famiy to ask them to watch these 14 minutes of video (in total). In your gut you know something is wrong and needs to be fixed. Big changes are needed, but not these Chicago Jokers changes...
I think “pre-revolutionary” is a good term to describe the mood of the country right now.
My gut tells me that all of the “pre-revolutionaries” are holding back, to see what will happen after the November elections.
If there isn’t a major course correction back toward some semblance of sanity after November, all bets are off for 2011. We could well see the Tea Parties evolve to the next logical level, which of course, would be the revolutionary stage.
The republicans in every state should run clips of Pete Stark stating that the federal government has no constitutional restraints and can do pretty much anything they want...and then ask Americans if they want the constitution or incumbent politicians.
What would happen if every red state and probably quite a few blue states were to send their most respectable and highest elected Sheriff to Washington DC with arrest warrants for Obama?
Congress won’t
Secret Service won’t.
FBI won’t.
Whats going to happen? Will there be an armed force protecting Obama? Rows of tanks, machine guns, SWAT with tasers and gas?
Or will they just whisk him away to some secret place?
No amount of MSM brainwashing is making Obamas ratings climb, the truth is out, Obama failed to qualify to be POTUS.
I've got to ask.
What has Boehner done wrong? As Minority Leader, his primary responsibility is to keep the minority united behind the Republican position.
To an astounding degree, he's done exactly that. On key votes, only zero to three votes (of 178) are going astray -- significantly fewer than the number of Democrats who are abandoning Pelosi.
I've yet to get a suitable answer to my question. Perhaps, you can provide one.
I think the Democrats have given us plenty of fodder and it should be used widely and at will.
When one starts targeting states and districts, the pickings don’t seem as promising as the overall generic ballot might indicate. For example in TX, there is unlikely to be any change for Congress.
Suck a lemon, Theodore.
Flores WILL beat Chet. In a walk.
And Ciro (TX23) is in big heap o trouble. Even Doggett isnt safe in a tidal wave. Just watch.
>>>My gut tells me that all of the pre-revolutionaries are holding back, to see what will happen after the November elections.<<<
Mine, too. If the elections look rigged or outright stolen by the left, that’s the moment for me... since, certainly, the left will then have to eliminate the opposition in order to continue their hold on power, and when the left decides to eliminate the opposition, bloodshed follows.
God help us.
God help us.
Yes, indeed.
No good American wants to see this country come to bloody revolution again, but there is every chance that it may come to that. If it does, my pity is on the unpatriotic left, for it's they who will suffer the brunt of the devastation.
The patriotic right is like a doomsday device that once unleashed, will destroy all that threatens it in a hellfire conflagration. Only centuries of civilized tradition is holding its fury in check right now.
If the treasonous ruling class had any sense, they'd cease and desist this very instant. Unfortunately, they show no signs of understanding the forces at work here. It looks to me as though they're going to push us where we don't want to go.
Need some block-quotation, colored fonts, italics, etc., to keep it straight -- who's talking? Ace? Pat? You?
Wait a minute. Where did you see that?
Fact: It is a simple matter to prove that one is a natural born citizen.
Fact: Obama has gone to considerable effort and spent tax dollars and his own to prevent the release of the common documents that would prove ( or disprove) his natural born status.
Fact: A natural born president would be **HONORED** to promptly prove ( with the **best** evidence) to any soldier or other citizen that he was indeed natural born and eligible to be president and Commander in Chief.
Conclusion: That Obama has treated military officers and other citizens in the manner that he has, strongly indicates that he is a usurper.
Simple isn't it?..., but... Even though 6 out of 10 Americans ( 60%) have serious questions about Obamas eligibility, this **60%** is labeled fringe and kooks
My gut tells me that all of the pre-revolutionaries are holding back, to see what will happen after the November elections.
. . . which is an excellent reason for my proposal that the states call for a convention to propose amendments to the Constitution. That would be a quasi-revolutionary act, in that it would cut Congress, and the president, out of the loop. There being nothing in the federal system, other than the equality of the states' representation in the Senate, which would be beyond the reach of such a convention.The convention could call for amendments reducing the size of the SCOTUS bench, for example - and voting specific justices off the island. It would be possible, for example, to make SCOTUS much more conservative by eliminating the billets of the two Obama appointees. Or marginally more conservative by eliminating the billets of Kennedy and any one of the liberals on the court. An amendment could even replace the POTUS and VP.Things like that could seem radical. But if the alternative is a revolution, they would actually be conservative.
The reality of the situation is that modern communications would make it far more practical than in times past for the states to coordinate among themselves and pass an amendment relatively quickly. Hey, Obama did claim to want hope and change!
Mr. CAddell makes no mention of election irregularites.
Why?
(just asking.)
I don't support a Constitutional Convention for the reason that you would not be able to lock the treasonous left out of such a convention. You would simply be opening the door for a wholesale dismantling of our Constitution in broad daylight by globalist elites and hard left operatives.
I don't support a Constitutional Convention for the reason that you would not be able to lock the treasonous left out of such a convention. You would simply be opening the door for a wholesale dismantling of our Constitution in broad daylight by globalist elites and hard left operatives.. . . which is an excellent reason for my proposal that the states call for a convention to propose amendments to the Constitution. That would be a quasi-revolutionary act, in that it would cut Congress, and the president, out of the loop.
Any proposal to amend the Constitution is by its nature dangerous. But compared to revolution?? Not so much.Desperate ills are by desperate measures cured. Or not at all. - Shakespeare, Macbeth.My thesis is that the states have good reason in self interest to make conservative changes in the federal judiciary. Once make a conservative change in the federal judiciary by means outside the control of Congress and the president, and the proof of concept alone would change the way jurists think. We want them to think that "If the states are willing and able to do THAT, then the Constitution must mean what it says after all."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.