Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Amtrak locomotive plan great idea
Erie Times-News ^ | August 12. 2010 | editorial

Posted on 08/12/2010 6:52:11 AM PDT by Willie Green

The federal government has the chance to rebuild the nation's passenger rail service by upgrading Amtrak's aging fleet of locomotives. We must seize that opportunity.

The idea is for Amtrak to secure loan guarantees under the Railroad Rehabilitation and Improvement Financing program to revitalize its fleet with higher-speed, diesel-electric locomotives that would reach speeds between 110 and 124 mph. Up to $35 billion is available under the program, according to the U.S. Department of Transportation's website.

If it happens, GE Transportation, as the top locomotive manufacturer in the United States, would be poised perfectly to compete for the Amtrak contract.

The idea is good for Amtrak, good for GE Transportation, good for GE's 4,000 Erie employees, good for its 700 Grove City employees, good for GE's 250 suppliers in Pennsylvania alone and, most of all, this is a great idea for America's traveling public.

In recent days, the Erie Regional Chamber and Growth Partnership has led support of the plan, and they deserve credit for doing so. First Erie City Council stepped forward in support, followed by Erie County Executive Barry Grossman, County Council and Mayor Joe Sinnott.

The plan would give Amtrak's fleet better fuel efficiency, lower emissions and higher speed. GE Transportation has said the new locomotives would deliver an estimated fuel savings of 15 percent "and an emission reduction of approximately 60 percent" compared to the older locomotives still in service.

(Excerpt) Read more at goerie.com ...


TOPICS: US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: amtrak; bobbybaccalieri; boxcarwillie; choochoocharlie; diesel; dmu; trains
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last
To: BfloGuy
You do understand, of course, that those revenue tariffs on imported goods will be paid by American citizens who are already overburdened by taxes and stand to see another hike come January 2011.

If that's what they want to buy, then it OK with me if they pay the tax on it. At least then they'll have jobs making tax-free stuff for the rest of us instead of collecting unemployment.

41 posted on 08/12/2010 10:19:45 AM PDT by Willie Green ("Some people march to a different drummer - and some people polka.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

“Passenger rail systems are not only more fuel efficient per passenger-mile compared to individual automobiles, they are also much more durable and have longer ecoomic lifespans.”

All this might be true if you could accurately predict future demand. You can’t, which means huge investments in road beds that go where no one wants to go. We have been through this before. Trains go from train station to train station, cars go exactly where you want to go. There is a huge disconnect between these two realities.


42 posted on 08/12/2010 10:29:08 AM PDT by equalitybeforethelaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

I don’t buy that.

Rail travel and mass transit is useless. It is only for high density clusters. If you want to kill property values then you suck all the business and move it around rail travel stations near the high rises owned by insiders.

Mass transit will NOT fix congestion, it will just force people to cram into stink filled cattle movers.


43 posted on 08/12/2010 11:00:04 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

I don’t buy that.

Rail travel and mass transit is useless. It is only for high density clusters. If you want to kill property values then you suck all the business and move it around rail travel stations near the high rises owned by insiders.

Mass transit will NOT fix congestion, it will just force people to cram into stink filled cattle movers.


44 posted on 08/12/2010 11:00:15 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: equalitybeforethelaw; Willie Green

What Willie’s not telling you is that Amtrak doesn’t treat depreciation of capital assets as an expense. So, if the railroad rolling stock is treated as “free” for accounting purposes, yeah, it’s cheaper than the cost of purchasing and replacing an automobile.


45 posted on 08/12/2010 11:06:58 AM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: equalitybeforethelaw
All this might be true if you could accurately predict future demand.

The future demand can be predicted just as accurately as for a road or highway.

Trains go from train station to train station, cars go exactly where you want to go.
Trains follow the track.
Cars follow the road.
Not much difference, except RR tracks are less expensive to build than highways.

There is a huge disconnect between these two realities.
Yes, trains are much faster and fuel efficient.
They are also more durable and a much more comfortable and relaxing way to travel.
And they carry a lot more people too.
46 posted on 08/12/2010 11:29:32 AM PDT by Willie Green ("Some people march to a different drummer - and some people polka.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

Which came first Willie, tracks or roads?


47 posted on 08/12/2010 11:40:49 AM PDT by equalitybeforethelaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: equalitybeforethelaw
Nobody knows for sure.
The earliest examples of both date back to around 4000 BC.
48 posted on 08/12/2010 11:51:42 AM PDT by Willie Green ("Some people march to a different drummer - and some people polka.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: calex59
If private industry thinks passenger rail service will make money then they will build it themselves.

No they won't.
Private industry funds politicians to obstruct passenger rail competition so that they can maintain the status quo without investing in newer, more efficient technology.

49 posted on 08/12/2010 12:25:40 PM PDT by Willie Green ("Some people march to a different drummer - and some people polka.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

What about those of us in the West like California, you don’t see a problem with spending our tax dollars so the East coast can get new locomotives?

The crappy light rail we have here in Sacramento is a perfect example of a solution to a problem that didn’t exist. I watch the light rail train every time I’m stuck waiting for it, once a day if not twice and the cars are almost all empty during rush hour.

I wish they’d decommission it. What a waste of money.


50 posted on 08/12/2010 12:57:25 PM PDT by Lx (Do you like it, do you like it. Scott? I call it Mr. and Mrs. Tennerman chili.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lx
What about those of us in the West like California, you don’t see a problem with spending our tax dollars so the East coast can get new locomotives?

Not at all.
Amtrak serves more passengers in California than any other state in the Union.
You have nothing to whine about.

51 posted on 08/12/2010 1:54:04 PM PDT by Willie Green ("Some people march to a different drummer - and some people polka.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

Where did you get those stats. We have what, three major routes unless you count the commuter trains in LA.

I’m not whining, I’m tired of you expecting everyone here to embrace (and pay) for rail service. Do you even post in other threads?

I happen to love rail, in Europe. They actually go to even little towns and there’s main stations everywhere.

What has rail done for California?

You have a lot of nerve to expect everyone to pay for your pet project and then get indignant when people mention your rail boondoggle.

This is California, we drive.


52 posted on 08/12/2010 2:23:17 PM PDT by Lx (Do you like it, do you like it. Scott? I call it Mr. and Mrs. Tennerman chili.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Lx
Where did you get those stats. We have what, three major routes unless you count the commuter trains in LA.

National Association of Railroad Passengers
2008 Amtrak fact sheet by state (pdf)
Click here for other fact sheets (by train, by station, by congressional district, previous years, etc.)

In 2008, California was #1 with almost 10.7 million passengers.
New York was a very close 2nd with 10.4 million.

That does not include "pass thru" passengers such as those traveling from Boston to DC who have to "pass thru" NY without having to get on or off the train. New York had about 1.1 million "pass thru" passengers. California apparently didn't have any.

I believe that 2009 Amtrak ridership fell a little short of 2008's record numbers. But 2010 is well on it's way to shatter the previous records. Tough to say whether Cal will still be leading NY, but it certain that they're both higher than the 2008 data.

53 posted on 08/12/2010 2:50:36 PM PDT by Willie Green ("Some people march to a different drummer - and some people polka.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog
(I hear Leavenworth, Kansas is lovely this time of year).

Your heard wrong. Try again in about two months.

54 posted on 08/12/2010 4:13:08 PM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog
(I hear Leavenworth, Kansas is lovely this time of year).

Your heard wrong. Try again in about two months.

55 posted on 08/12/2010 4:13:17 PM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

Even private lines are dangerous.


56 posted on 08/13/2010 10:56:52 AM PDT by mountainlion (concerned conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson