Weren’t propositions 187 and 209 also similarly left to twist in the wind like this?
This "standing" thing has become a hammer to beat up those who would participate in the culture wars.
If the very sponsors of the amendment that was overturned by the judge do not have "standing", then it appears to me that the concept of standing has problems that the malicious use as a club.
Schwarzenegger should be dragged out of office and not allowed to complete his term.
Pray for the USA.
Arnold long ago quit his job as governor, and is now firmly back in the gay hollywood leftist camp.
He just never bothered to officially resign, and tell us.
This is ALL about his marketability in hollywood go-forward.
First the soap box then the ballot box.And when that is struck down by some fruitcake judge claiming the people have no standing its time for the cartridge box.
No way Jerry the fairy will appeal, he’s queerer than a 3 dollar bill.
Amendment 1.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or for men to have sexual relations with other men; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
See, it’s a right. It there in black and white.
A Hollywood Governor married and controlled to a Kennedy, A States Attorney who is running for Governor by seeking the queer vote, a Judge who is a homosexual in a state made up of illegal aliens and liberal turds.
Not much chance there.
This judge is an idiot....supporters of Prop 8 have standing....they were the ones challenged in court....and they were the ones who proposed the legislation
This is a heterophobic judge appointed by the Liberal RINO George H W Bush. A GOP judge is now aiding the Liberals.
The supporters of Prop 8 should continue to proceed, since they do have standing, as they were the ones who got the legislation started
When that happens, get ready for hell.
“Calif. won’t appeal Prop 8 ruling (and judge says regular citizen have no standing)”
Great decision!!!! One would guess Californians have the right to marry their dog, their horse or their chimp etc. What a country!!
It’s weird, but I actually find myself thinking that it’s better for California to have same-sex marriage than for this to go all the way to the Supreme Court and result in another Roe v. Wade monstrosity, this time deciding that same-sex marriage is a constitutional right in all 50 states.
so 52.3% of voters who voted for the prop have no legal standing,.......why bother voting if thats the case.
California is a tyranny.
Any Judge who issues a socially destructive immoral decision like this should be impeached, removed from office and then disbarred.
This ruling after the fact “unconstitutional” crap has happened multiple times regarding these initiatives in California now. I’ve never understood why the Constitutionality of initiatives wasn’t determined prior to the vote.
IN THIS CASE the Judge is a known homosexual, and should have recused himself, or his participation as the ruling Judge on the matter challenged due his known bias. I still believe something should be done regarding the Judge’s bias.
Yes I agree a straight Judge could be biased as well, but he/she wouldn’t be sitting there ruling with their hand on their crotch dreaming of that evening’s romp at the local bath house either.
Wake up, America. This isn’t just the destruction of the most fundamental building block of our civilization, the institution of marriage. This is the willful destruction of our entire form of republican self-government, upon which your liberty depends.
That ruling ends any definition of “marriage.”
If the courts rule that a marriage doesn’t have to be between a man and woman, then why should it limit marriage between species, or more than 2 people?
Mark