Replies

From an earlier thread today.....

Have you even taken the time to read one page of Dr. Taitz’ motions? How do you know the “clerks” in the Supreme Court are not guilty of altering records? I, for a fact, have spoken directly with Mr. Eric Fossum on July 27 2010, a clerk in the Supreme Court when Dr. Taitz first heard of Justice Alito allegedly denying her motion. She discovered that not only were her documents not entered into the log of the Court, there was no “Official” signature by Justice Alito, or any other Justice. When I asked Mr. Fossum if this was true, he initially told me “A clerk signed it” and when I tried to question him further by asking him “Is this the same as a “Real Justice” signing the documents”he was something less than forthcoming in his answers and finally told me”I’m not going to go down this road any more any more”, and hung up on me.

It appears, to use a metaphor, “The Patients Are Running the Asylum”. Translated: “The clerks Are Running the Supreme Court and the Justices Are Nothing More Than Spectators. As someone who posts here said earlier “He’s alright with that”.

I find it very troubling that people are trying to defend the corruption in all 3 branches of what’s left of our government... Dr. Taitz is absolutely correct in her efforts at exposing the Supreme Court and it’s clerks who appear to be complicit in the ongoing stonewalling we see every day. Have any of these “apologists” for Obama considered the thought that if he is in fact a usurper to the office of President, each and every order he has signed or will sign will be nullified and we then will be subject to the wrath of just about every country in addition to the thought that many brave soldiers fighting and will die wrongful deaths under his unlawful command. This is unacceptable.

Have you even taken the time to read one page of Dr. Taitz’ motions? How do you know the “clerks” in the Supreme Court are not guilty of altering records?

You never see anything from the Supreme Court with an ink signature from a Justice-- not in Orly's case, not in any case. All you ever get is a letter from the Clerk of the Court (who is a permanent official, not a Justice's law clerk-- Orly seems to be confused between the two positions), saying that the Court denied a motion or denied certiorari.