Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: the invisib1e hand
said the action was its first ever against a state, and only its second against any government over the handling of a public pension fund.

A number of states, if not all of them, are in this same boat. Does the choice of state have to be an example have something to do with the electoral choice of the New Jersey citizens?

8 posted on 08/19/2010 3:37:14 PM PDT by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's "Economics In One Lesson.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: arthurus
A number of states, if not all of them, are in this same boat. Does the choice of state have to be an example have something to do with the electoral choice of the New Jersey citizens?

That was my first thought, but given this...

New Jersey agreed to settle the case without admitting or denying the SEC’s findings. The state consented to a cease-and-desist order, and wasn’t required to pay any civil fines or penalties.

it seems like a non-issue.

And a little bizarre.

The link is for the P&I story, which I seem to have failed to post in #2 above.

9 posted on 08/19/2010 3:42:20 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (Gawd I love being an American.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson