“starie decisis” shouldn’t apply to interpretation of the Constitution, not after the liberals have sat on SCOTUS.
DAMN good point!
““starie decisis” shouldn’t apply to interpretation of the Constitution, not after the liberals have sat on SCOTUS.”
There are actually 3 parts of common law:
1: Written law.
2: Past practice.
3: “Stare Decisis”
In most cases the “liberal” justices that assumed the bench ignored all 3 in producing their edicts, and it is exactly because people presume them to have the authority to dictate to everyone else what the law is regardless of the written document that has given them the power to perpetrate this right usurping fraud.
The truth is in respecting “Stare Decisis” as conservatives justice do they are really just empowering the criminal usurpers that have sat on the bench before them.
But at the same time if conservatives don’t respect the tradition they can have no way to demand liberals do the same. which is why many of them do. But this argument is a mute point cause you know liberals will never respect their “Starie Decisis” just as they haven’t before. All you are doing in letting them be the master of the constitution and all of us the servants of their edicts.
So I’m with you the tradition of “Starie Decisis” must be abandoned as it does the cause of law and order no good while there have been any courts that either don’t respect it or apply it selectively.
This is perhaps one area where Louisiana’s Civil Code has an advantage over our “Common law”.