Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

More documents refused to be entered by another Supreme Court "Clerk"
August 21, 2010 | MODELSHIPS

Posted on 08/21/2010 10:18:14 AM PDT by MODELSHIPS

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: Non-Sequitur

And I can’t read her name without thinking of the O rly? Owl.


21 posted on 08/21/2010 4:45:19 PM PDT by netmilsmom (I am inyenzi on the Religion Forum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom
Photobucket
22 posted on 08/21/2010 5:50:37 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

That’s the one!


23 posted on 08/21/2010 7:51:05 PM PDT by netmilsmom (I am inyenzi on the Religion Forum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom
Re: If all the other records were there, I wouldn’t care if we saw a BC.

That's a pretty big "if," isn't it.

This is a recorder:



You're a birther -- like it or not.

24 posted on 08/24/2010 6:16:49 AM PDT by Beckwith (A "natural born citizen" -- two American citizen parents and born in the USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: El Sordo

I am convinced that Orly Taitz is an Obama false flag operation. Her misspellings, tortured grammar, and her lack of understanding of the law have poisoned the well and established precedents in her losses that make it impossible for qualified attorneys to pursue legitimate questions about Obama’s eligibility.

Not one conservative constitutional attorney who has ever actually argued a case before the US Supreme Court has taken on any of the Obama eligibility lawsuits.

Here’s what a conservative Chief US Federal District Court Judge appointed by Ronald Reagan had to say about Orly Taitz: “This is one of several such suits filed by Ms. Taitz in her quixotic attempt to prove that President Obama is not a natural born citizen as required by the Constitution (See US Const. Art. II, Sect. 1). This Court is not willing to go tilting at windmills with her.”—Chief US Federal District Court for the District of Columbia Royce C. Lamberth in dismissing the quo warranto claim in Taitz v Obama, April 14, 2010.


25 posted on 08/28/2010 9:20:44 PM PDT by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson