Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Secret US-Russian Sanctions vs Bushehr Deal Tied Israel's Hands
Debkafiles ^ | August 21, 2010, 6:11 PM (GMT+02:00)

Posted on 08/22/2010 6:38:09 PM PDT by dselig

The Obama administration and Netanyahu government greeted the start-up of Iran's first nuclear reactor at Bushehr with extraordinary meekness, given the grim military and strategic hazards it represents for the region and Israel in particular.

Yet nary a squeak of protest came from Washington or Jerusalem when Russian technicians began loading 162 rods of 82 tons of fuel into Iran's nuclear reactor - a process that will take two weeks - Saturday, Aug. 21 - notwithstanding US-led sanctions, Israel's military preparations and international diplomatic posturing.

The State Department said Saturday after the event that Iran's Bushehr nuclear plant has "no proliferation threat" - a statement that was completely beside the point.

Both the Kremlin and the State Department have joined in concealing the secret deal whereby Russia votes for UN Security Council sanctions against Iran in return for US silent acquiescent to Moscow's activation of the Bushehr reactor.

The price the Obama administration and the Netanyahu government paid was prohibitive: Vladimir Putin was allowed to jump the Iranian nuclear drive miles forward toward a capacity for producing weapons-grade plutonium.

(Moscow claims the rods will be returned, but Iran's capacity for deception and concealment in the entire last decide s well documented.)

Both Obama and Netanyahu had been beguiled into trusting that President Dmitry Medvedev's tougher line on Iran would prevail in the Kremlin.

But Medvedev was nowhere to be seen last Monday, Aug. 15 when Putin took the risk of ceremonially assigned Sergei Kirienko, head of Rosatom, with shipping fuel to Bushehr within a week and getting the reactor on stream, after years of delays.

The Russian leader got away with showing the Muslim world the worth of Moscow's backing - upstaging the side show put on in Washington the day before when US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton announced the onset of direct Israeli-Palestinian peace talks on Sept. 2 - a process which the greenest of Middle East pundits appreciates as having nowhere to go.

The Netanyahu government was supposed to have all its worries swept away by the US assurance that the Iran threat is not imminent but eleven months away, as the New York Times reported Friday, Aug. 20.

The next day the London Telegraph mocked this assertion by explaining that US officials were really saying that "the process of converting nuclear material into a weapon that worked would take at least 12 months" - a prospect hardly likely to ease Israel's concerns.

Omitting any comment on the Bushehr reactor, Prime Minister Netanyahu stated that Israel's security would be paramount in a deal with the Palestinians.

He issued a list of stipulations, such as the demilitarization of territory handed to the Palestinians - only side arms for police; Israel would retain control of the Jordan Rift Valley bordering the Kingdom of Jordan and the mountain ridges forming the spine of the West Bank, they key to defending Jerusalem and Israel's coastal plain.

Many will recall the prime minister's solemn reiterations that a nuclear-armed Iran would pose an existential threat to Israel and noticed how fast they have faded.

His "security pledges" regarding a future Palestinian state on the West Bank should therefore be taken with a hefty grain of salt.

Indeed, according to Washington sources, the prime minister may already be listening to a US proposal to assign the policing of the Jordan Valley and West Bank mountain peaks to NATO troops, most of them American.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Israel; News/Current Events; Russia; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: iran; israel; russia; waronterror

1 posted on 08/22/2010 6:38:12 PM PDT by dselig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dselig

Putting our troops their that is a 1st. Yowzer, how is that going to work....


2 posted on 08/22/2010 6:44:19 PM PDT by taildragger ((Palin / Mulally 2012 ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dselig

Sorry to say the truth might be in this particular article, but Debka has a flaky history, so I don’t bother reading anything they put out.


3 posted on 08/22/2010 6:49:33 PM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists, Call 'em what you will. They ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; bigheadfred; blueyon; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; ...
Thanks dselig.
Both the Kremlin and the State Department have joined in concealing the secret deal whereby Russia votes for UN Security Council sanctions against Iran in return for US silent acquiescent to Moscow's activation of the Bushehr reactor. The price the Obama administration and the Netanyahu government paid was prohibitive: Vladimir Putin was allowed to jump the Iranian nuclear drive miles forward toward a capacity for producing weapons-grade plutonium.
Zero's fault! Aren't ya glad he pressed the Reset Button?


4 posted on 08/22/2010 7:15:15 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Democratic Underground... matters are worse, as their latest fund drive has come up short...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dselig

A friend sent me this. I have no clue if this is true, but if it is, it explains a lot:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Jhx_2TqffE


5 posted on 08/22/2010 7:19:59 PM PDT by RatRipper (I'll ride a turtle to work every day before I buy anything from Government Motors.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dselig

The End has to begin somewhere...


6 posted on 08/22/2010 7:21:29 PM PDT by pankot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dselig

awesome. I would love to have US troops protecting Israel’s border. how about Texas’ and Arizona’s, too?


7 posted on 08/22/2010 7:30:42 PM PDT by naturalized
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dselig
Obama is such a stooge. Before he was elected I said he would make Carter look good. Now I'm starting to feel like he is going to make Chamberlain look good.
8 posted on 08/22/2010 7:36:00 PM PDT by oldbrowser (Barack the Bungler must step down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
Bushehr's faultTM.

...now, not even homonyms are safe.

Cheers!

9 posted on 08/22/2010 7:47:32 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dselig

If where will be any evidence of using that to make weapon grade plutonium Russians will be the first to bomb that.


10 posted on 08/22/2010 11:09:33 PM PDT by cunning_fish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

LOL!


11 posted on 08/23/2010 4:20:57 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Democratic Underground... matters are worse, as their latest fund drive has come up short...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dselig

The Russians need to be paid for the reactor. After they get paid, all bets are off

That is my thought.


12 posted on 08/23/2010 4:23:14 PM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... Greetings Jacques. The revolution is coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson