Obama Admin Relents, Posts Pro-Abstinence Education Study After Complaints

LifeNews.com ^ | August 24, 2010 | Steven Ertelt

[julieee]

Obama Admin Relents, Posts Pro-Abstinence Education Study After Complaints

Washington, DC -- The Obama administration relented on Monday in the face of public pressure and national news highlighting how the Health and Human Services Department refused to make public a new study showing the effectiveness of abstinence education programs.

http://LifeNews.com/nat6653.html

[Scythian]

Obama : Dang, now less children will get STD’s ...

Is that what he’s thinking? I mean, I don’t get it.

[PhilosopherStone1000]

When my daughter turned 13 I told her flat out: “When you have sex as a teenaged girl there are 10 things that can happen and nine of them are bad. Plus, I guarantee that if you are scrunched up in the back seat of some guy’s car with your prom dress around your head then ten out of ten things will be bad.”

[ilovesarah2012]

I wish Stanley Dunham would have practiced abstinence!

[freeangel]

” Dang, now less children will get STD’s ...

Is that what he’s thinking? I mean, I don’t get it.”

I’m guessing what he’s thinking is that now HIS children might be told that actions have consequences by somebody in the know. Of course, that would be punishing them just like not getting an abortion, right?

[Nachum]

The list, ping

[Dr. Bogus Pachysandra]

They were refusing FOIA request, until they were swamped with them. Obama and his administration are all scumbags!

[The Comedian]

Well, so much for Baraq's School Faggotry Czar getting a shot at more victims with no conflicting documentation...

Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.

[Captain Rhino]

Chad Hills, a social policy analyst with CitizenLink, added, “This information would better inform policymakers concerning the standard which a majority of the public wants them to uphold in public education. If they are not fully informed, how can they establish good policies?”

With all due respect Mr. Hills, your naivete is showing. These studies are meant to merely legitimize a priori (before the fact) doctrinally-based policy decisions. To actually take time to gather the facts and have policy makers wait until they have analyzed them to formulate policies is so...so gauche.

Tsk, tsk Mr. Hills. And you a policy analyst.