Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama, Congress Cut $ for 176 Abstinence Programs Despite New Study
LifeNews.com ^ | August 26, 2010 | Steven Ertelt

Posted on 08/26/2010 9:17:49 AM PDT by julieee

Obama, Congress Cut $ for 176 Abstinence Programs Despite New Study

Washington, DC -- More than 176 abstinence education programs will lose funding for their outreaches to youth and young adults on September 30 because Congress and the Obama Administration canceled all grants going to abstinence-centered programming in their FY2010 budget.

http://LifeNews.com/nat6659.html

(Excerpt) Read more at LifeNews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: abstinence; obama; programs; study
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 08/26/2010 9:17:53 AM PDT by julieee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: julieee

Is Congress FINALLY cutting spending????? /sarc.


2 posted on 08/26/2010 9:19:15 AM PDT by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: julieee

He needs more dem voters.


3 posted on 08/26/2010 9:20:01 AM PDT by ilovesarah2012 (Proud Infidel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: julieee

He wants to see his little girls take full advantage of their black heritage. Sleep around and then have abortions on the governmant dime so they won’t be “punished”.


4 posted on 08/26/2010 9:20:16 AM PDT by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

They will just give it to Planned Parenthood so they can teach their version of safe sex.


5 posted on 08/26/2010 9:20:50 AM PDT by christianhomeschoolmommaof3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

They’d much rather spend the money to buy kids condoms and pay for abortions. Why is the democratic party so intent on sexualizing children? Bunch of perverts I tell ya.


6 posted on 08/26/2010 9:21:16 AM PDT by No Socialist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: julieee

they will only cut where it hurts..they will never cut pork


7 posted on 08/26/2010 9:22:13 AM PDT by dalebert (true hillbilly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: julieee

Why are these programs necessary? Can’t someone say no without the government teaching them how?


8 posted on 08/26/2010 9:22:53 AM PDT by stuartcr (Nancy Pelosi-Super MILF.................................Moron I'd Like to Forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: No Socialist

Look up “sex positive agenda”.

It’s what the left is all about,
and it’s just one facet of their anti-family agenda.


9 posted on 08/26/2010 9:23:10 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: julieee

Actually, cuts sound pretty good to me. Why is the FEDERAL government in the abstinence education business in the first place? All we need do now is eliminate ALL federal education spending. It’s not their job. They have no business doing it.


10 posted on 08/26/2010 9:24:31 AM PDT by CitizenUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: julieee
Young adults are hornier than dogs on Viagra. To think that an abstinence program is going to make any difference is delusional.
This is one of the few times I agree with what's in the budget.

Besides, I don't think it's the governments business. It's up to parents to educate their kids in sexual matters, not our incompetent government.

Also, does it make sense to support both abortion and abstinence? Kind of an oxymoron thing if you ask me.

11 posted on 08/26/2010 9:29:32 AM PDT by Frenchtown Dan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: julieee

cutting abstinance programs:

These programs shouldn’t have been started in the first place. We’re giving the FedGov too much of our money to play with.


12 posted on 08/26/2010 9:42:43 AM PDT by frposty (I'm a simpleton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frposty

I agree with you and the other posters who think “abstinence education” is not the business of the Federal government.


13 posted on 08/26/2010 9:46:54 AM PDT by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: julieee

Back when 0bama was running, I remember listening to him say specifically that he wanted women to be ‘able to have all the abortions you want.’

Think of all those stem cells.......

Democrat elites will be trolling for body parts.


14 posted on 08/26/2010 9:56:42 AM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spirito Sancto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

“I agree with you and the other posters who think “abstinence education” is not the business of the Federal government”

You have put your finger on what should be the main theme of the Republican’s campaigning: the government is doing too many things that are none of its business, and in the process taking too much of our money. And government is also spending huge amounts of our money bailing out individuals and institutions that have behaved irresponsibly.


15 posted on 08/26/2010 10:08:19 AM PDT by frposty (I'm a simpleton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: julieee
Statement: "Obama, Congress Cut $ for 176 Abstinence Programs Despite New Study"

Response: The "New" model of governance will be free food, free rent, free games, and free love. The population is almost at that level anyway.

16 posted on 08/26/2010 10:20:00 AM PDT by AEMILIUS PAULUS (It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: christianhomeschoolmommaof3

“They will just give it to Planned Parenthood so they can teach their version of safe sex.”

.. a warped and defective ‘sex ed’ that actually encourages promiscuity and keeps planned parenthood in the abortion business


17 posted on 08/26/2010 10:45:46 AM PDT by WOSG (OPERATION RESTORE AMERICAN FREEDOM - NOVEMBER, 2010 - DO YOUR PART!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA

what you dont realize is that Obama admin is not cutting spending at all, they are diverting money from effective abstinence programs into other programs that sexualize youth in the classroom.


18 posted on 08/26/2010 10:47:36 AM PDT by WOSG (OPERATION RESTORE AMERICAN FREEDOM - NOVEMBER, 2010 - DO YOUR PART!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

“I agree with you and the other posters who think “abstinence education” is not the business of the Federal government.”

Just understand that this money was about 0.1% of the $80 billion spent on education by the Fed Govt, and the Obama administration and Dems are all for spending much more than this on ‘comprehensive’ sex ed.

Here is the reality - what is REALLY going on:
Liberals hate abstinence sex ed, because it encourage moral-based thinking in youth. They make claims it doesnt work and move the funding to their version of sex ed:

http://www.jacksonfreepress.com/index.php/site/comments/sex_ed_advocates_attack_just_wait/

But abstinence DOES work ..

http://www.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/02/02/abstinence.study/index.html?hpt=Sbin&hpt=T2

What works even better is kids who are not in broken homes and have parents who rear their children in ways that support moral behavior.


19 posted on 08/26/2010 11:06:07 AM PDT by WOSG (OPERATION RESTORE AMERICAN FREEDOM - NOVEMBER, 2010 - DO YOUR PART!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: WOSG

“.. a warped and defective ‘sex ed’ that actually encourages promiscuity and keeps planned parenthood in the abortion business”

nothing like teaching school kids that anal is “responsible birth control”.


20 posted on 08/26/2010 11:50:30 AM PDT by stompk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson