Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Jim DeMint is changing the political landscap
Wall Street Journal ^ | 8/27/2010 | Steve Moore

Posted on 08/29/2010 12:55:46 AM PDT by County Agent Hank Kimball

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: Darkwolf377

Geez, where ya been pal? DeMint started his PAC over a year ago and has been posted about on FR many times. He is the man we need to look to for Senate Leader. If you go to yesterdays WSJ opinion page, he penned an OPED piece that would make any conservative swoon at the possibilities.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703579804575441331350216628.html?mod=djemEditorialPage_h

As far as supporting him in his race in South Carolina, I would call it safe as the last Rasmussen poll has him leading the Dem Greene at a 63-19 clip.


21 posted on 08/29/2010 3:57:44 AM PDT by mazda77 (Rubio for US Senate - West FL22nd - Scott for FL Gov. - Miller AK US Senate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: marron

Are you implying that DeMint is a tofu politician?


22 posted on 08/29/2010 3:59:03 AM PDT by mazda77 (Rubio for US Senate - West FL22nd - Scott for FL Gov. - Miller AK US Senate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch

I’ll never give to the NRSC or the GOP again, even if Demint is chairman.

My money goes to Conservatives only.


23 posted on 08/29/2010 4:12:21 AM PDT by jch10 (Cry havoc, and let slip the dogs of war...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Rashputin

to Resolve the executive order problem congress needs to thin the body of laws. All executive orders are based upon some law already passed by congress.

We now have an accumulated build up of 200 years of laws. so of course the presidency is extremely powerful.

Honestly I think an amendment that puts an automatic ~20 year maximum expiration date on every act of congress is in order.

I’d rather have to have a majority required to maintain a law, then a majority to kill a law.

Just as I would also rather have congress spend much of its time debating the merits of renewing existing laws rather then passing new laws that usurp yet more rights from us.

On this grounds I really don’t care who runs for president of the United States, unless that person was willing to dismiss all Federal employees in unconstitutional non-defense departments, to make enforcement of unconstitutional Federal edicts impossible.


24 posted on 08/29/2010 5:00:22 AM PDT by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: County Agent Hank Kimball

.....Next he says, “we may not be able to repeal ObamaCare, but we can cut off the funding....”

love it....


25 posted on 08/29/2010 5:06:59 AM PDT by Former MSM Viewer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: County Agent Hank Kimball
The fund-raising group has already helped eight underdog Reaganite candidates win Republican Senate primaries this year.
I wonder who those eight were. Could Joe Miller have been one? Anybody know?

God Bless Jim Demint. God Bless America!!!

26 posted on 08/29/2010 5:09:26 AM PDT by no dems (To Every Democrat in the U.S. House and Senate: "Shame, shame. Shame on all your houses.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems

http://senateconservatives.com/


27 posted on 08/29/2010 5:16:51 AM PDT by GOP_Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: County Agent Hank Kimball

I read this article online the day it was posted.

The reason I did not post it was because it did not contain anything that we already didn’t know.

A good article though.


28 posted on 08/29/2010 5:18:49 AM PDT by GOP_Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tanuki
Top of my list, too.
This article certainly makes it clear why someone would think so.
Hey, if they can get one of their senators into the Oval Office, why can’t we?
Senators do occasionally get elected POTUS - but not when they're running against a sitting POTUS - and only one (Harding) ever beat a governor in a race for the White House.

The example of Cheney notwithstanding, VP is not an executive position. So you cannot use Kennedy's victory over Nixon as a counterexample to the fact that the guy with executive experience wins.

Granted that, as matters presently stand, Obama couldn't defend his seat against a Republican school board member - but two years is a lifetime in politics.

So I say, let's not take a chance. Palin would definitely be good enough - let's not let "better" be the enemy of good enough.

I advocate "drafting" Palin because, as the election laws are written (not that I consider them constitutional, but . . .) a movement in that direction appears to be the best way to proceed. And because we have seen how easily the nomination can be obtained by a Senator Dole or a Senator McCain who simply is not gonna win. Lifer senators have a lot of political favors to call in, so they can readily get nominated - but they are sure losers in the POTUS sweepstakes.

Granted that DeMint doesn't strike me as a lifer type, but IMHO if we never nominate another senator, it'll be too soon. Any party which doesn't have a single governor who's a rising star doesn't deserve to win the presidency.


29 posted on 08/29/2010 5:21:21 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (DRAFT PALIN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion
So you cannot use Kennedy's victory over Nixon as a counterexample to the fact that the guy with executive experience wins.
Actually, Nixon probably won that election so the example still stands.
30 posted on 08/29/2010 5:23:50 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion

Excellent post #29. I agree with everything you said.


31 posted on 08/29/2010 5:25:13 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: County Agent Hank Kimball

The RNC “wonders” why its funding is drying up? Here’s one reason. Why give to the RNC when Lindsey Graham would get part of your donation? Nope, my money (what little I can afford) ALL goes to DeMint’s PAC.


32 posted on 08/29/2010 5:27:01 AM PDT by ThePatriotsFlag (If you aren't at Obama's Table, you are probably on the MENU! - The Patriot's Flag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jch10

Amen, remember what the RNC and NRSC did with OUR money for Lincoln Chaffee in a PRIMARY?

That was my final straw.


33 posted on 08/29/2010 5:35:42 AM PDT by CPT Clay (Pick up your weapon and follow me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: County Agent Hank Kimball

“Trent Lott recently spoke for many in the party when he said it didn’t need anymore “Jim DeMint disciples.”

DeMint/Palin-2012: we sure as heck don’t need anymore like the spineless, gutless fool sellout, Trent Lott, a prime example of the GOP elite ruling class, now entrenched in DC as a lobbyist.


34 posted on 08/29/2010 5:41:44 AM PDT by izzatzo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch

You nailed Cornyn. When first elected to the Senate, I thought he was a conservative; but, he’s more like McCain than anyone else and needs removal from his NRSC postion.


35 posted on 08/29/2010 5:46:09 AM PDT by izzatzo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: County Agent Hank Kimball

I don’t think he wants to run for leadership. I do think we need him more then ever after the elections to hopefully keep the new Senators that ran on a conservative capaign from being corrupted by the leadership.


36 posted on 08/29/2010 5:48:09 AM PDT by Soul Seeker (?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: County Agent Hank Kimball

Music to my ears


37 posted on 08/29/2010 6:22:32 AM PDT by Cathy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: County Agent Hank Kimball

yes.


38 posted on 08/29/2010 7:04:19 AM PDT by ken21 (who runs the gop?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

B T T T


39 posted on 08/29/2010 7:18:33 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (((.Go troops! " Vote out RINOS. They screw you EVERY time" Jim Robinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric; alrea; Amanda King; americanophile; Artemis Webb; Babsig; Canticle_of_Deborah; ...
Thanks for the ping.

  
Jim
DeMint
Ping!

Want on or off this ping list? Just FReepmail me.

Follow Sen. DeMint on Twitter.

Jim is running for reelection this November. If you like his philosophy, consider tossing him some bucks.

40 posted on 08/29/2010 7:19:47 AM PDT by upchuck (The Mosque at Ground Zero (sorry AP) is about SUBMISSION, not tolerance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson