I guess my satire photoshop job of Obama as Big Brother ain't so much "satire" anymore:
We, as citizens, should get very nervous when progressive, big-givernment people in positions of authority within the federal government start talking about “re-education”. Ask the citizens that Wilson and FDR gathered together during the World Wars in an effort to make sure they were “thinking right”.
Why did Sebelius announce only that reeducation is needed? Why didn’t she begin the reeducation? She could have given us fallacy #1 followed by the truth, and so on.
My opinion is that will never happen because further discussion of the bill will only increase opposition to it.
Maybe a bit of October surprise hype?
So when they pull off their vote fraud
with the help of ACORN (whatever it is now),
they can say the polls didn’t reflect the
re-enlightenment of the masses.
Maybe we should ask the survivors of Cambodia’s Killing Fields how they feel about the term “re-education.”
I would have said something a little friendlier, like, "People who don't like this law ought to be in a Gulag or something."