Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Britain’s Leading Gay Activist Calls for Lowering of Age of Consent to 14
Life Site News ^ | Wednesday September 1, 2010 | Hilary White

Posted on 09/02/2010 12:34:11 PM PDT by GonzoII

Wednesday September 1, 2010


Britain’s Leading Gay Activist Calls for Lowering of Age of Consent to 14

By Hilary White

LONDON, September 1, 2010 (LifeSiteNews.com) – One of Britain’s leading homosexualist activists has called again for the lowering of the age of sexual consent from 16 to 14, saying that this will reduce incidents of sexual abuse of young people. Peter Tatchell, founder of the group OutRage!, wrote on the website Big Think, “Whether we like it or not, many teenagers have their first sexual experience around the ages of 14 or 15.”

“If we want to protect young people, and I do, the best way to do this is not by threatening them with arrest, but by giving them frank, high quality sex and relationship education from an early age.

“This includes empowering them with the skills, knowledge and confidence to say no to unwanted sexual advances and to report sex abusers. Compared to the blanket criminalization of sexually-active under-age youth, this empowerment strategy is a more effective way to protect young people from peer pressure and pedophiles.”

A higher age of consent actually puts young teens at greater risk of abuse by “reinforcing the idea that young people under 16 have no sexual rights,” Tatchell said. “They signal that a young person is not capable of making a rational, moral choice about when to have sex.”

“Guilt and shame about sex also increase the likelihood of molestation by encouraging the furtiveness and secrecy on which abuse thrives,” he added.

“Despite what the puritans and sex-haters say, underage sex is mostly consenting, safe, and fun,” Tatchell said. “If there is harm caused, it is usually not as a result of sex, per se, but because of emotional abuse within relationships and because of unsafe sex, which can pass on infections and make young girls pregnant when they are not ready for motherhood.”

OutRage! has long lobbied for the lowering of the age of consent in Britain, which was already lowered for homosexual acts from age 21 in 1994 and again in 2000 to 16, after heavy lobbying by homosexualist activists.

Carolyn Moynihan, an Auckland journalist with a special interest in family issues, responded at Mercatornet, saying it is “a little bit surprising” that Tatchell has made the suggestion at the time when he is part of a protest against Pope Benedict, whom he accuses of failing to protect young people from sexual predators.

Moynihan said, “Of course there will always be underage people who have sex, but that doesn’t mean the law should condone it. Sex is a very complicated part of human behavior that is too nuanced for young people to understand.”

She cited studies that have shown that young people, especially girls, who have sex at early ages often regret it. She quotes Daily Telegraph columnist David Lindsay saying, “Sex is for people who can cope with the consequences, physical and otherwise. In a word, adults.”

URL: http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2010/sep/10090110.html


Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article or portions of it without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any website publishing of complete or large portions of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. The link is not required for excerpts. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews.com from other sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: academicbias; ageofconsent; ageofconsentlaws; comeforyourchildren; cultureofcorruption; culturewar; homosexualagenda; indoctrination; manboylove; moralabsolutes; outrage; petertatchell; seduction; seicus; sexeducation; sexpositiveagenda; sexualizingchildren; statutoryrape
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last
"this will reduce incidents of sexual abuse of young people."

It will increase their being seduced into perversion.

1 posted on 09/02/2010 12:34:16 PM PDT by GonzoII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

Ah, NAMBLA moves to Britain!!!! Isn’t radical liberalism beautiful?


2 posted on 09/02/2010 12:35:32 PM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

Completely disgusting


3 posted on 09/02/2010 12:36:08 PM PDT by wastedyears (Iron Maiden's new album in the top 5 in the US. Incredible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII
“If we want to protect young people, and I do, the best way to do this is not by threatening them with arrest, but by giving them frank, high quality sex and relationship education from an early age.

The real meaning

4 posted on 09/02/2010 12:36:20 PM PDT by frogjerk (I believe in unicorns, fairies and pro-life Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

Here we go - right back down to the stone ages - - the very thing that toppled great nations - the perversions is the big RED FLAG that signals the end...


5 posted on 09/02/2010 12:36:29 PM PDT by BCW (http://babylonscovertwar.com/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

Well now, if the age of consent was reduced to zero, then there would be absolutely no sexual crimes against children, ya think?

Moral reprobates.


6 posted on 09/02/2010 12:36:41 PM PDT by Manly Warrior (US ARMY (Ret), "No Free Lunches for the Dogs of War" (my spelling is generally korrect!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII; wagglebee

Celebrate perversity.

Defining deviancy downwards.


7 posted on 09/02/2010 12:36:48 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (I want IMPROVEMENT, not just CHANGE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

“this will reduce incidents of sexual abuse of young people.”

It will increase their being seduced into perversion.

The leftist argument for sexualizing our curriculum here in the states...to make them stronger.

BSTRDS.


8 posted on 09/02/2010 12:36:55 PM PDT by jessduntno ("There's only one true Christian liberal in the country and that's Mike Huckabee." - Ann Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

I bet he his. Nice, the pervs are so enbolden by their PC pulpit that dare to speak the truth of their desires. Not that there is anything wrong with it.


9 posted on 09/02/2010 12:37:15 PM PDT by equalitybeforethelaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

I guess this also would lower the age of consent to 14 for HIV and syphilis


10 posted on 09/02/2010 12:37:33 PM PDT by A_Former_Democrat (NO MOS-que AP: It's the "GROUND ZERO MOSQUE")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

“saying that this will reduce incidents of sexual abuse of young people”

When they outlaw sex with minors, only outlaws will have sex with minors.


11 posted on 09/02/2010 12:37:40 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (I want IMPROVEMENT, not just CHANGE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

Your place in HELL is reserved scumbag..


12 posted on 09/02/2010 12:39:18 PM PDT by SECURE AMERICA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk

Yep.

“Guilt and shame about sex”

The sex positive agenda (as espoused by Reich, Kinsey, feminists, and SEICUS) pushes an end to ALL moral judgements over ALL sexual pairings regardless of sex, age, relation, marital status, number, or species of partner(s).

Rome didn’t fall in a day.


13 posted on 09/02/2010 12:39:47 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (I want IMPROVEMENT, not just CHANGE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII; EagleUSA

Bloody Baby BUGGERS!

Pedophiles at it again.


14 posted on 09/02/2010 12:40:18 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

and that is just what the gay agenda is, and always has been, about; removing the age of consent.


15 posted on 09/02/2010 12:40:21 PM PDT by dirtymac (Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country. Calling all Son's of Liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

Now the “gay community” will tell you they should get married but NOT the NAMBLA people. It is now gay vs child rapist - why should one have rights the other does not.


16 posted on 09/02/2010 12:40:48 PM PDT by edcoil (I can't fix stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

“Britain’s Leading Gay Activist Calls for Lowering of Age of Consent to 14”

But we are told not to believe that queers and pedophiles are one and the same.


17 posted on 09/02/2010 12:41:29 PM PDT by Grunthor (My coffee creamer is fat free because I am not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII
Peter Tatchell about to get one...


18 posted on 09/02/2010 12:43:13 PM PDT by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

Inside every “loving, caring, normal” homosexual lies a predatory beast who desperately wants to sodomize your preschool son.

Even the most ardent homofascist realizes that surrendering to those urges will cross the social boundaries today—but they’re working on it!


19 posted on 09/02/2010 12:43:22 PM PDT by TruthHound ("He who does not punish evil commands it to be done." --Leonardo da Vinci)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII
A higher age of consent actually puts young teens at greater risk of abuse by “reinforcing the idea that young people under 16 have no sexual rights,” Tatchell said. “They signal that a young person is not capable of making a rational, moral choice about when to have sex.”

If there is harm caused, it is usually not as a result of sex, per se, but because of emotional abuse within relationships and because of unsafe sex, which can pass on infections and make young girls pregnant when they are not ready for motherhood.”

That's kind of an argument FOR abstinence. The sex positive proponents are against abstinence not because it doesn't work but because they see sex as a birthright to be enjoyed by everyone with everything at every age. Not acting on that impulse is "unhealthy".

20 posted on 09/02/2010 12:45:27 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (I want IMPROVEMENT, not just CHANGE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson