Posted on 09/03/2010 10:22:09 AM PDT by BitterKlingon
Based on trend lines and generational breakdown of poll results (obviously, younger voters are going to stay around longer than older ones, Chicago Democrats notwithstanding), they may be right....
“I dont understand why this is suddenly even coming up. We had ONE Republican come out of the closet this week”
Yes, there seems to be a full court press going on. They must think that they are on the brink of a victory.
I also think the Libertarian influence in the GOP and on these boards is a factor.
The GOP doesn’t need to “purge” anyone. You know nothing about Newt’s life or what was going on in his marriage. Vitter either. The Left will always manufacture what they can’t prove and that will never change. Just make sure your house is in order and don’t worry about anyone else’s “morality issues”.
Your point is wrong. There is no equivalent between opposing divorce and opposing the radical homosexual agenda. To act like we have to do both equally or else we have no credibility is only a phony liberal talking point.
And now we are going to make a point about cheating? What do you suggest we do? Put tracking devices on our candidates? Get real.
Michael Moore, Larry Flint, Gore Vidal, George Soros, David Brock, Barak Obama, Bernie Sanders and Sean Penn.
Frum, Schmidt, McCain, (throw in Romney too) ... very appropriate for them to talk to the HuffPo.
Bitter Klingon (so you love to be bitter and cling to your guns and religion huh?), help us understand your point in posting this article on FR as well as your encouragement to "purge" people. That sounds more socialistic/fascist than conservative.
Bullschtize!!!
Name three issues on which she departed from the McCain line.
Should be easy, if she disagreed on "most," as you claim.
Personally, I can’t think of even one, and I stay pretty well informed.
Welcome back, Zort.
Gay “marriage” is about all it’ll take to shove this country down the poop hole.
Gay “marriage” is about all it’ll take to shove this country down the poop hole.
There is a strong conservative case for going along with what 5000+ years of Judeo-Christian religion and tradition have to say about marriage. I sure as heck don’t care what some loony atheist gay has to say about it. Some gay theorist who has nothing to base his gay theories of marriage on?
Gay marriage is 80% for financial reasons...much of it so one gay can get on the others health plan and other benefits. Not that I approve of the legal gay domestic partnership arrangements either which help gays glom onto health plan coverage etc..... But they can have that, not marriage
You're welcome.
Methinks this noob is a ‘cross-dresser’.
The Day the Republican Party makes support for Same-Sex Marriage part of their platform will be the LAST time I will have EVER voted for a Republican...PERIOD!
I don’t make mortal sins a conservative cause.
Do you smell ozone?
Marriage is about Children, we know this from historical, and practical experimentation.
There is and can be no conservative case for the abomination of “Gay marriage”. marriage is not just about love its mostly about children. Just as 2 people of the same sex are not capable of having children with each-other naturally they also cannot get married.
If Marriage we’re about love then there would never have been any arranged marriages.
If Marriage we’re about love they would not be exclusively between just 2 people. After all you love a great many people, why be restricted to just marrying one of em?
In-order to justify “gay marriage” you have to redefine marriage upon a foundation which is untenable. This is akin to driving the final nail into the coffin of marriage.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.