His defense in court:
Is the state insiting that I have an obligation to allow my family to be victims of a mob?
Is the state asserting that lethal shots are preferred to warning shots?
Is the state claiming that a 911 phone call would have solved the threat in time?
Your Honor, the Constitution asserts my right to defend myself and my family, and I did so without harming ANYBODY.
The arresting authorities took no action against the thugs that threatened my family and instead sought to restrain me from carrying out my Constitutionaly protected, God given responsiblity.
The court’s response? “Shut up, honkey. White people have no rights any longer.”
He should walk to the closet set of microphones and state EXACTLY that:
“Is the state insisting that I have an obligation to allow my family to be victims of a mob?
Is the state asserting that lethal shots are preferred to warning shots?
Is the state claiming that a 911 phone call would have solved the threat in time?
Your Honor, the Constitution asserts my right to defend myself and my family, and I did so without harming ANYBODY.
The arresting authorities took no action against the thugs that threatened my family and instead sought to restrain me from carrying out my Constitutionally protected, God given responsibility.”
If only to get the message out to the potential jury pool.