So the message we send the world is that the U.S. is afraid of the muzzie street and will repress offensive speech to placate that rage. Sad. Now we have the Ground Zero Iman saying that he has to build the mosque there because otherwise it will inflame the muzzie street. Where does this end?
Secretary Gates calling Jim Robinson and personally telling him to pull certain FR threads that could be offensive to Muzzies.
Further question. What if the muzzie street demanded an end to Gay Pride marches or demonstrate if an abortion clinic is built too close (for them) to a mosque. i.e., if something that the hard left values is threatened, will they concede or is it just the 80% of the US population which is bigoted and islamophobic s\ who have to carry this cause?
It ends with sharia law.
The Real Impact of Sharia Law in America
Does Sharia law allow a husband to rape his wife, even in America? A New Jersey trial judge thought so. In a recently overturned case, a “trial judge found as a fact that defendant committed conduct that constituted a sexual assault” but did not hold the defendant liable because the defendant believed he was exercising his rights over the victim. Fortunately, a New Jersey appellate court reversed the trial judge. But make no mistake about it: this is no isolated incident. We will see more cases here in the United States where others attempt to impose Sharia law, under the guise of First Amendment protections, as a defense against crimes and other civil violations.
The defendant’s Imam testified that a wife must comply with her husband’s sexual demands and he refused to answer whether, under Islamic law, a husband must stop his sexual advances on his wife if she says “no.”
The trial judge found that most of the criminal acts were indeed proved, but nonetheless denied the permanent retraining order. This judge held that the defendant could not be held responsible for the violent sexual assaults of his wife because he did not have the specific intent to sexually assault his wife, and because his actions were “consistent with his [religious] practices.” In other words, the judge refused to issue the permanent restraining order because under Sharia law, this Muslim husband had a “right” to rape his wife.
http://blog.heritage.org/2010/09/02/the-real-impact-of-sharia-law-in-america/