Even Pinch is putting his people on notice. The reality is that 1 out of every 2 liberal staffers currently working in the NY Times newsroom will be out of a job in the very near future.
1 posted on
09/10/2010 12:17:43 PM PDT by
jimbo123
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
To: jimbo123
To: jimbo123
HaHa!
You can only fool the “rubes” with your lies for only so long.
I see their non-print editions swirling down the drain also.
3 posted on
09/10/2010 12:19:31 PM PDT by
PATRIOT1876
(Language, Borders, Culture, Full employment for those here legally)
To: jimbo123
4 posted on
09/10/2010 12:19:45 PM PDT by
Drango
(NO-vember is payback for April 15th)
To: jimbo123
Gotta save those trees, you know..............
5 posted on
09/10/2010 12:20:47 PM PDT by
Red Badger
(No, Obama's not the Antichrist. But he does have him in his MY FAVES.............)
To: jimbo123
Well wouldn’t that just be the bees knees!
6 posted on
09/10/2010 12:20:52 PM PDT by
cblue55
( BO stinks!)
To: jimbo123
Journalists should have no difficulty finding shovel ready jobs.
8 posted on
09/10/2010 12:22:24 PM PDT by
Huskrrrr
To: jimbo123
YEEEE-HAAAAAAWWWWWW!!!!
9 posted on
09/10/2010 12:22:49 PM PDT by
theDentist
(fybo; qwerty ergo typo : i type, therefore i misspelll)
To: jimbo123
You mean all the fawning pro-Islamic puff pieces cannot save them?
Maybe the Saudis ccan send Carlos Slim $500 million to keep the S.S. NY Times afloat a bit longer.
10 posted on
09/10/2010 12:23:08 PM PDT by
Frantzie
(Imam Ob*m* & Democrats support the VICTORY MOSQUE & TV supports Imam)
To: jimbo123
Newsroom staff reduction. For all intents and purposes the NYT only has editorial and columnists now.
11 posted on
09/10/2010 12:24:26 PM PDT by
School of Rational Thought
(Need work. MBA, CPA, Black Belt. Diverse industry and cross border experience.)
To: jimbo123
I’ll be toasting this news in an hour and 44 minutes.
12 posted on
09/10/2010 12:24:28 PM PDT by
ryan71
(Let's Roll!)
To: jimbo123
Just when I was thinking about starting to get it. Despite its liberal point of view and you’re having to weed through it, it still has pretty good in-depth info on some things.
13 posted on
09/10/2010 12:25:17 PM PDT by
Jim W N
To: jimbo123
Stop the Presses!!! Literally.
14 posted on
09/10/2010 12:25:26 PM PDT by
Huskrrrr
To: jimbo123; Timesink; martin_fierro; reformed_democrat; Loyalist; =Intervention=; PianoMan; GOPJ; ...
NEW YORK TIMES? STICK A FORK IN IT......it's done!
I wonder if an omsbudsman will declare a fatwa on me now.
17 posted on
09/10/2010 12:29:48 PM PDT by
a fool in paradise
(Barack attended the church of GD America for 20 years. He has NO room to speak out on religion.)
To: jimbo123
My theory is that NYT was once the standard of reporting excellence and objectivity.
While they were not above mixing some opinion with fact, the opinion was usually mainstream.
Once they "went liberal" that began the descent into taking sides, trying to hurt the opposition and then, partisan assinations. As the opinion became more and more left of center, the subscriptions declined steadily.
Bottom line, they did themselves in with liberalism, but they really did it to themselves. The public just stopped trusting the NYT.
18 posted on
09/10/2010 12:30:15 PM PDT by
Rapscallion
(Obama - Arrogant, blaming, incompetent, anti-American, Muslim,racist, and Marxist....Is that enough?)
To: jimbo123
This is why the left is fighting to control the interweb.
19 posted on
09/10/2010 12:30:57 PM PDT by
NoLibZone
(Communities regularly fight the construction projects, Walmarts Starbucks and even tree removal.)
To: jimbo123
20 posted on
09/10/2010 12:31:06 PM PDT by
stanz
To: jimbo123
I’ll go chill the champagne.
21 posted on
09/10/2010 12:31:24 PM PDT by
Interesting Times
(For the truth about "swift boating" see ToSetTheRecordStraight.com)
To: jimbo123
Bird cage owners devastated!
24 posted on
09/10/2010 12:37:08 PM PDT by
Darkwolf377
(Forget it, Jake. It's Chinatown. -- written by Robert Towne)
To: jimbo123
"We will stop printing The New York Times sometime in the future, date TBD." True for most newspapers and other paper periodicals. The convenience and portability factor of a newspaper isn't quite there yet in electronic format, but the writing is on the screen. There might be some call for paper publications, much like horse carriage rides, but most people take motorized vehicles. It doesn't matter which brand of carriage you're talking about - they will all be replaced.
25 posted on
09/10/2010 12:38:17 PM PDT by
KarlInOhio
(Gun control was originally to protect Klansmen from their victims. The basic reason hasn't changed.)
To: jimbo123
OK, everybody, how is Carlos Slim going to get his 250 Million back? Being as how there was never a public statement as to his reason for making such a substantial investment in a dead whore, so to speak, he must have gotten clear title to the whorehouse itself.
26 posted on
09/10/2010 12:38:20 PM PDT by
Bedford Forrest
(Roger, Contact, Judy, Out. Fox One. Splash one.<I>)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson