To: Kaslin
This could all be set right if it were acknowledged by the courts that any ideology, religious or not, loses any constitutional protections it may claim to enjoy if it advocates the violent overthrow of the government or poses a clear and present danger to national security.
4 posted on
09/12/2010 7:27:38 AM PDT by
SpaceBar
To: SpaceBar
Who would have “standing” to bring that before a court?
5 posted on
09/12/2010 7:29:14 AM PDT by
null and void
(We are now in day 596 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
To: SpaceBar
Since that would have no bearing on this situation, I can only interpret that to be an attempt to skirt everyone’s rights.
21 posted on
09/12/2010 7:45:13 AM PDT by
LilAngel
(FReeping on a cell phone is like making Christmas dinner in an Easy Bake Oven)
To: SpaceBar
Remember the Symbionese Liberation Army? It started out as a religion.
31 posted on
09/12/2010 7:55:50 AM PDT by
Terry Mross
(If we don't try to stop this soon it will be too late.)
To: SpaceBar
I thought you were suggesting that burning the koran poses a clear and present danger. Sorry about that.
34 posted on
09/12/2010 7:59:06 AM PDT by
LilAngel
(FReeping on a cell phone is like making Christmas dinner in an Easy Bake Oven)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson