Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Montana GOP policy: Make homosexuality illegal
Associated Press ^ | 09/18/2010 | MATT VOLZ,

Posted on 09/18/2010 12:10:48 PM PDT by presidio9

At a time when gays have been gaining victories across the country, the Republican Party in Montana still wants to make homosexuality illegal.

The party adopted an official platform in June that keeps a long-held position in support of making homosexual acts illegal, a policy adopted after the Montana Supreme Court struck down such laws in 1997.

The fact that it's still the official party policy more than 12 years later, despite a tidal shift in public attitudes since then and the party's own pledge of support for individual freedoms, has exasperated some GOP members.

"I looked at that and said, 'You've got to be kidding me,'" state Sen. John Brueggeman, R-Polson, said last week. "Should it get taken out? Absolutely. Does anybody think we should be arresting homosexual people? If you take that stand, you really probably shouldn't be in the Republican Party."

Gay rights have been rapidly advancing nationwide since the U.S. Supreme Court struck down Texas' sodomy law in 2003's Lawrence v. Texas decision. Gay marriage is now allowed in five states and Washington, D.C., a federal court recently ruled the military's "don't ask, don't tell" policy unconstitutional, and even a conservative tea party group in Montana ousted its president over an anti-gay exchange in Facebook.

But going against the grain is the Montana GOP statement, which falls under the "Crime" section of the GOP platform. It states: "We support the clear will of the people of Montana expressed by legislation to keep homosexual acts illegal."

Montana GOP executive director Bowen Greenwood said that has been the position of the party since the state Supreme Court struck down state laws criminalizing homosexuality in

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: gaystapo; homobama; homosexualagenda; montana; perverts; sodomhusseinobama; sodomy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 401-406 next last

1 posted on 09/18/2010 12:10:51 PM PDT by presidio9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Sodomites and their behavior are an immensely destructive force. Lawrence and the Montana decision were clear usurpations by the liberals in the legal profession.


2 posted on 09/18/2010 12:14:20 PM PDT by achilles2000 ("I'll agree to save the whales as long as we can deport the liberals")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Have to start somewhere cleaning this place up,pushing the Queers out of sight is a great start.


3 posted on 09/18/2010 12:17:14 PM PDT by Cheetahcat (Zero the Wright kind of Racist! We are in a state of War with Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

What do you expect from a state represented by two (2) Dem U.S. Senators :)


4 posted on 09/18/2010 12:17:33 PM PDT by nhwingut (Palin/Bachmann '12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

I find this hard to believe, but if it is true, then they need to change their platform.

It’s easy for me to see this and just shake my head.

But imagine if you’re gay, or if you’re gay in Montana.

This is EXACTLY how the GOP loses elections.

This is probaby intended to push buttons, but I hope Republicans in Montana will distance themselves.

Believe me, I know better than most that many gays and lesbians are extremely self-centered and are incapable of seeing the big picture.

But I really would like to see Pelosi get fired come November.


5 posted on 09/18/2010 12:18:54 PM PDT by rosettasister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

This is quite the textbook example of unbiased reporting here. Just a bang up job. I’d never discern what this writer personally favored, as it’s so very hidden away in this spectacularly balanced, even-handed, neutral, aloof, nonpartisan, unbiased, objective piece of writing.


6 posted on 09/18/2010 12:18:54 PM PDT by CaspersGh0sts (he world. Gradually, as technology has advanced, man has put aside faith, books, or anything that r)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Someone has to “take the first shot”. I would be honored to vote homo illegal.


7 posted on 09/18/2010 12:19:30 PM PDT by NoGrayZone (Please Lord, give America a 2nd chance. Through your Son Jesus Christ, Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

What do you expect from a state represented by two (2) Dem U.S. Senators :)


A perfect post.


8 posted on 09/18/2010 12:21:57 PM PDT by Steamburg (The contents of your wallet is the only language Politicians understand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Didn't Texas just get rid of their gay laws? Of course, they were set up...in the courts IIRC, it was a privacy issue.

I think the UN proposed "consent" being age 12.

9 posted on 09/18/2010 12:23:44 PM PDT by Sacajaweau (What)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoGrayZone

Back in saner times, homosexual acts were illegal in many states. I don’t recall hearing that these states or the country as a whole were less free because of this.


10 posted on 09/18/2010 12:26:44 PM PDT by liberalism is suicide (Communism,fascism-no matter how you slice socialism, its still baloney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: presidio9

The people have every right to make such a law. the Supreme Court was full of baloney in overturning sodomy laws.

Personsally I have no desire to see a movement to support making homosexual acts or beliefs illegal but the people do have a right to regulate how sexuality is dealt with in a public matter 100%.

The left-wing have continually pushed to force their perverted morality upon this nation. They do not respect the will of the people at all.

While I do not desire a movement that seeks to punish those by force of government for homosexual beliefs or acts, I have had enough of their facism against us by force of law and have no sympathy at all if they reap what they sow.

It is the left-wing progressives and their strong belief in homosexuality that have infringed upon the rights of millions of Americans who disagree with their perverted morality.

People are getting sick of their moral corruption and how they target our children.

There is no doubt that most of these corrupt perverts do deserve to put away.


12 posted on 09/18/2010 12:29:44 PM PDT by TheBigIf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rosettasister

I prefer to stay the hell out of other people’s bedrooms.


13 posted on 09/18/2010 12:31:23 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Actually, to put a fine point on it, it seems like the state GOP wants to make homosexual acts illegal, and not make homosexuality illegal.


14 posted on 09/18/2010 12:31:37 PM PDT by Ted Grant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9; achilles2000

Not clear from the article: is this a matter of sodomy being illegal for gays only, or also illegal for heterosexuals?


15 posted on 09/18/2010 12:32:11 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Point of interrogation..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rosettasister

No it is by accepting corruption and perversion that the GOP loses elections.

People have had it with the constant attacks on this nation’s morality by the left-wing and those who moderate their positions in favor of them in the GOP.


16 posted on 09/18/2010 12:32:45 PM PDT by TheBigIf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ted Grant

Then I guess oral and anal sex are out of the question?!


17 posted on 09/18/2010 12:33:27 PM PDT by rosettasister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

The law has nothing to do with overturning ‘due process’ rights and going into your bedroom.

It has to do with how the issue is dealt with when become public.


18 posted on 09/18/2010 12:34:01 PM PDT by TheBigIf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TheBigIf

“how the issue is dealt with when become public”

Please explain.


19 posted on 09/18/2010 12:35:43 PM PDT by rosettasister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: rosettasister

I haven’t seen the platform, but same-sex oral and anal sex are homosexual acts, and therefore acts they would seek to legally prohibit.

That doesn’t mean being gay in their jurisdiction would be illegal, though.

It means engaging in homosexual acts would be illegal. So long as a gay doesn’t engage in homosexual acts, he or she should be fine.


20 posted on 09/18/2010 12:36:22 PM PDT by Ted Grant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 401-406 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson