Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cookie Shop Accused Of Refusing 'Coming Out Day' Order
theindychannel.com ^ | September 30, 2010 | Joanna Massee

Posted on 10/01/2010 4:39:01 AM PDT by Abathar

INDIANAPOLIS -- A cookie shop at Indianapolis' City Market is being investigated after a university said the business refused to fill an order for a National Coming Out Day celebration.

Heather Browning, a coordinator for social justice education in the Office of Student Involvement at Indiana University Purdue University-Indianapolis, was organizing the Oct. 7 event, aimed at encouraging coming out and discussion of gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender issues.

She told 6News' Joanna Massee that she called Just Cookies to inquire about getting rainbow cookies made for the event.

"When I explained it to him the nature of the celebration, the gentleman told me that it was against their morals and values to do so, and then hung up on me," Browning said.

City spokesman Robert Vane said the city will launch an investigation next week to determine if Just Cookies, which has operated inside the City Market since the 1990s, violated Indianapolis' anti-discriminatory ordinance.

"Growing the City Market through offering a better product means little when the people offering a better product can decide who they want to sell to and who they don't," Vane said.

(Excerpt) Read more at theindychannel.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Indiana
KEYWORDS: bakery; homosexualagenda; indianapolis; justcookies
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last
To: Question Liberal Authority

I think, for a “coming out day” celebration, fudge would be more appropriate than cupcakes or cookies.


41 posted on 10/01/2010 6:12:39 AM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tlb

Foolish or not, shouldn’t he have the freedom to decide whether or not to cripple his own livelihood?


42 posted on 10/01/2010 6:15:04 AM PDT by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Canedawg

The “love that dare not speak its name” won’t shut up. Need to have a “Sit down, shut up, and leave our kids alone” day.


43 posted on 10/01/2010 6:16:44 AM PDT by Little Ray (nO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

Beware: The Feds must have Mrs. Shield’s cookie recipe!


44 posted on 10/01/2010 8:35:29 AM PDT by LurkedLongEnough
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlb

I see you’re still posting with you head in the sand.


45 posted on 10/01/2010 8:41:20 AM PDT by Balding_Eagle (If America falls, darkness will cover the face of the earth for a thousand years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: madprof98

It is not wearing me down, it is making me angry! I am not to the point of “Oh, whatever” I am to the point of telling them to Shut up and quit whining!


46 posted on 10/01/2010 9:26:40 AM PDT by panthermom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: tlb

47 posted on 10/01/2010 9:49:09 AM PDT by LomanBill (Animals! The DemocRats blew up the windmill with an Acorn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: tlb
Three versions to choose from. Of all possible reasons to cripple your own livelihood, frosting on some little cakes has to be one of the most foolish.

No one should have to lie to maintain basic freedoms in this nation.

It's not a free nation if the government is forcing someone to bake cupcakes or produce anything else that has a message a citizens doesn't want to endorse.

It's outrageous that anyone would think otherwise.

48 posted on 10/01/2010 1:11:20 PM PDT by Ol' Sparky (Liberal Republicans are the greater of two evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Abathar
Who, who does not want to wear the ribbon!!!
Who, who does not want to wear the ribbon?!
49 posted on 10/02/2010 3:00:54 PM PDT by fwdude (Anita Bryant was right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlb
We are mostly hearing the side of the homo-leftists in this outrageous story, so it's no wonder that it's constantly morphing to suit their agenda - leftists routinely lie, like the Islamists, and continue to change the lie to further their cause.

No, "rainbow" cupcakes are harmless. It's the motive and their use that can result in deleterious results. The owners didn't want to "sponsor" this endorsement of perversion, which is what it is. They absolutely have that right to refuse.

50 posted on 10/02/2010 3:05:41 PM PDT by fwdude (Anita Bryant was right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky
It's not a free nation if the government is forcing someone to bake cupcakes or produce anything else that has a message a citizens doesn't want to endorse.

It's outrageous that anyone would think otherwise.

Then you apparently don't know tlb.

51 posted on 10/02/2010 3:07:09 PM PDT by fwdude (Anita Bryant was right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson