Skip to comments.
It's smut, not art, Loveland protesters say
The Denver Post ^
| 10/1/10
| Monte Whaley
Posted on 10/01/2010 12:34:08 PM PDT by Bulldawg Fan
LOVELAND About 25 to 30 residents stood outside the Loveland Museum/Gallery this morning protesting a portion of an exhibit that appears to show Jesus Christ involved in a sex act.
"This is not art, it's smut, pure and simple," said Ronald Minto, who said he's not against graphic art per se. But the color lithograph produced by Stanford University's Enrique Chagoya is outright pornography, he said.
"This is a museum, not an X-rated book store," said Minto.
The lithograph is spread over 12 panels, each about 7- by 7-inches, and is called "The Misadventures of the Romantic Cannibals."
It's part of an touring 10-artist exhibit titled "The Legend of Bud Shark and His Indelible Ink."
The exhibit is slated to be at the Loveland Museum/Gallery through Nov. 28. But Loveland City Councilwoman Donna Rice hopes the public will put enough public pressure on the city, to force Chagoya's piece to be be yanked.
"This is a taxpayer supported, public museum and it's family-friendly," Rice said, adding a court-ordered injunction may also be in order. "This is not something the community can be proud of."
(Excerpt) Read more at denverpost.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News
KEYWORDS: 1stamendment; academicbias; antichristian; atheismandstate; budshark; doublestandard; enriquechagoya; firstamendment; hipsterdouchebag; itsnotamuslim; loveland; lowbrowart; moralabsolutes; postmodernism; religiousintolerance; stanford; stanforduniversity; taxdollarsatwork; unconstitutional; youpayforthis
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Rest easy, there is no descicration of Islam here. No threats to cut off heads or riots. Also, no call from the President of the United States to remove or not show this, no call from Sarah Palin either, no world wide outcry. No call from anyone other than locals. And they are being ignored. Double standard???? No way........ But just imagine if this was Muhammed instead of Jesus Christ. Oh my God!
To: Bulldawg Fan
A Muslim would know what to do! :0P
2
posted on
10/01/2010 12:37:19 PM PDT
by
Cowboy Bob
(Liberalism and Patriotism cannot coexist.)
To: Bulldawg Fan
It’s time to issue a fatwah!
3
posted on
10/01/2010 12:37:44 PM PDT
by
G Larry
(Patty-cake diplomacy must give way to strong, decisive action!)
To: Bulldawg Fan
Looks like they hit several communist goals with this one.
22. Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all forms of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings, substitute shapeless, awkward and meaningless forms.
23. Control art critics and directors of art museums. Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art.
24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them censorship and a violation of free speech and free press.
25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.
26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as normal, natural, healthy.
4
posted on
10/01/2010 12:38:50 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
To: Bulldawg Fan
The MSM will be very quiet about this - the ACLU won't give a damn... It's not a cartoon of Mohammad after all...
5
posted on
10/01/2010 12:39:03 PM PDT
by
GOPJ
(http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2589165/posts)
To: Bulldawg Fan
6
posted on
10/01/2010 12:39:08 PM PDT
by
CGASMIA68
To: Bulldawg Fan
Yup, nothing to see here, it’s only about Jesus.
Now if were about the 6th century child molester....well, that’s a horse (or a behead) of a different color.
7
posted on
10/01/2010 12:40:20 PM PDT
by
Da Coyote
To: Bulldawg Fan
8
posted on
10/01/2010 12:40:32 PM PDT
by
G Larry
(Patty-cake diplomacy must give way to strong, decisive action!)
To: cripplecreek
You know, now that I’ve looked at those,
they sure fit a Luciferian manifesto as well...
No coincidence.
9
posted on
10/01/2010 12:41:19 PM PDT
by
MrB
(The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
To: Bulldawg Fan; wagglebee
This is a taxpayer supported, public museum Then it MUST come down. The same "STATE" that is PROHIBITED from exhibiting the 10 Commandments or a Christmas tree on public property cannot use taxdollars to spit or sh*t on Christians EITHER.
10
posted on
10/01/2010 12:41:50 PM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(Ask yourself,where does Saudi Arabia fit on a scale of "passive" to "moderate" to "extremist" Islam?)
To: Bulldawg Fan
Why doesn´t this cowardly artist take on islam?
11
posted on
10/01/2010 12:42:17 PM PDT
by
onedoug
To: GOPJ
The antiChristian ACLU is only upset when it is a PRO-Christian representation.
The Constitution makes it clear that establishment clause covers both sides of the coin.
The ACLU is a bunch of communist bigots.
12
posted on
10/01/2010 12:43:20 PM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(Ask yourself,where does Saudi Arabia fit on a scale of "passive" to "moderate" to "extremist" Islam?)
To: Bulldawg Fan
OFF WITH HIS HEAD!
13
posted on
10/01/2010 12:43:29 PM PDT
by
fml
To: Bulldawg Fan
To: Bulldawg Fan
If there is nothing wrong with the explicit nature of the content, then why didn’t the newspaper reprint at least an excerpt of the work?
15
posted on
10/01/2010 12:45:47 PM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(Ask yourself,where does Saudi Arabia fit on a scale of "passive" to "moderate" to "extremist" Islam?)
To: Bulldawg Fan
If it’s Jesus, it’s art. If it was Muhammed, it would be hate speech. Welcome to Orwell’s 1984.
16
posted on
10/01/2010 12:47:05 PM PDT
by
Spok
(Free Range Republican)
To: cripplecreek
All those, and more, are in Aldous Huxley's Brave New World society.............
17
posted on
10/01/2010 12:47:11 PM PDT
by
Red Badger
(No, Obama's not the Antichrist. But he does have him in his MY FAVES.............)
To: Bulldawg Fan
What? No jihad? No fatwa? No “artist” gone into hiding because of death threats?
18
posted on
10/01/2010 12:47:35 PM PDT
by
mojito
Comment #19 Removed by Moderator
To: onedoug
You’ve answered your own question.
But then, you already knew that.
20
posted on
10/01/2010 12:50:51 PM PDT
by
DuncanWaring
(The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson