Posted on 10/02/2010 6:18:00 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued
Big brother has taken it to a new level, outfitting student Ids with tracking devices at Santa Fe Junior High and Santa Fe High School. Minus a few high profile shootings, schools are generally known as a safe environment for our children. Why then are these schools outfitted school ids with tracking devices that must be worn at all times?
Are our students going to school or prison? What is the threat that requires such drastic measures? How many more schools plan on implementing these Orwellian security measures?
Patrick Mann is a senior and said he feels like hes in prison. Normally, the one people you would track are say prisoners or somebody thats done something very wrong, Mann said. All students at Santa Fe Junior High and Santa Fe High School have to wear the radio frequency IDs. KHOU.com
This technology doesnt stop when you leave campus. Students have reported being tracked by campus police when they LEAVE the school grounds. Thats right, multiple schools are tracking students through the use of RFID technology, on and off campus.
At that Shell Station, they can see exactly where I am, Mann said. I know that because the school cops came up there and said, Hey, you need to get back to school. We tracked you over here.
(Excerpt) Read more at beforeitsnews.com ...
Bump!
“RFID jammer tags? Wrap school ID in foil?”
http://www.idstronghold.com/?gclid=CM3rs-nMxqQCFdJL5Qodtxj-iw
For that you need a "jammer tag." As I understand it, RFID works as a command/response system between the reader and the tag(s).
It starts with the reader pulsing saying "any tag"... Say there is only one tag in range. It replies with it's ID number. The reader can then try to cross-reference that number (128 bits or more?) with inventory, registered passports, Visa, etc. The tag's ID is simply an index into a database.
Suppose there are two tags in range though. Both will reply, and the reader will detect this "collision" as an attempted reply, but with multiple tags stepping on each other's replies. So the reader pulses again and says "Only tags with an ID that starts with 0..." If they still collide it'll try "Only tags that start with 00..." In other words, it will keep walking down the ID number in binary until it can differentiate the tags. Note, it will also try the "Only tags that start with 1..." too. Suppose there were 3 tags in range, with IDs "00..." and "00..." and "10..." The first collision would send it down the "00..." branch looking for unique IDs, but it can't ignore the 1s either. It is a simple binary tree traversal with the reader looking to prune branches as soon as that branch has no response or no a collision response.
As I understand it, jammer tags work by violating the protocol, and always replying with either 0s or 1s or just a random set of bits. But they always reply. So the reader can never get a clear, unambiguous read on any other tags in range. I like that idea. Why should someone be able to scan me and obtain information I have not given them permission to obtain? Jammer tags for everyone!
Okay, you are much more familiar with these gizmos than I am. I guess my link would be the alternative to the tinfoil.
I know I won’t have a credit card that you can wave at the cash register. Those numbers can be grabbed while the card is in your wallet by someone walking by with the proper scanner hidden in a briefcase.
The ideal zapper would be one that gave the scanner a virus.
I agree. I can assure you if my kids were still in elementary-high school, they would be home schooled or in a private school. No way would I send them to a public school. Abolish the NEA, states control their schools. Vouchers, we can send them to private schools if we want to and pay the difference.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.