do I really have to say it???
Posted on 10/04/2010 4:52:12 PM PDT by Red in Blue PA
A document obtained and witnesses interviewed by Fox News raise new questions over whether there was an effort by the Defense Department to cover up a pre-9/11 military intelligence program known as "Able Danger."
At least five witnesses questioned by the Defense Department's Inspector General told Fox News that their statements were distorted by investigators in the final IG's report -- or it left out key information, backing up assertions that lead hijacker Mohammed Atta was identified a year before 9/11.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
By the Clinton Administration, please note.
Wait a dang minute. That would have been on Clinton’s watch. Say it ain’t so..........
Yes, Yes never tell on the Clintons.
Able Danger = The stuff in clinton admin guys pants?
do I really have to say it???
Isn’t Able-Danger the report that Sandy Burglar snuck out of his office in his shorts?
That Congressman from PA was all over this back in 2005-06.
Clinton tried to have ABC pull the Harvey Keitel movie.
I seem to recall he did say when Bush took over that we'd be at war within a year.
It was well known that there was a possibility that American planes could be used as missiles in a terrorist attack long before 9/11. I remember reading information here at FR and/or on the web about Ramzi Yousef and his diabolical plans for the World Trade Center after the attack in 1993.
“Able Danger.” was a Bush AND Clinton cover-up. The expose of it cost Curt Waldon his US House seat to Sestak!
I remember well when we were all interested in Able Danger and then all of the sudden ... *poof*. What was the Congressman’s name? Weldon?
(The) Path to 9/11 is the movie. The version that was finally shown cut several damning scenes out but it still pinned the tail on the donkey (Hannity and others put the scenes on the internet).
There was a plane-based plot over the Pacific that was broken up - I don’t remember how long before 9/11 that was.
“It was well known that there was a possibility that American planes could be used as missiles in a terrorist attack long before 9/11.”
And it was portrayed in the Lone Gunmen television show in March of 2001 as a government consipiracy.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9rsMG2hHsLo
toothers!
We would NEVER in our wildest IMAGINATIONS have thought anyone would use a jetliner to attack us.
Who said it?
Clinton said that?
I don't remember it, but he does tend to run his mouth...
YUP.
Disappeared like a cloud of smoke.
Saturday, Oct. 22, 2005 12:14 a.m. EDT
Curt Weldon:
Gorelick Aide Blocked Able Danger Testimony
An aide to former Clinton Justice Department official Jamie Gorelick blocked the 9/11 Commission from hearing bombshell testimony about the findings of the elite Able Danger military intelligence team, Rep. Curt Weldon said late Friday.
“The person who debriefed [Able Danger analyst] Scott Philpot was, in fact, the lead staffer for Jamie Gorelick,” Weldon told the Fox News Channel’s “Hannity & Colmes.” “His name was Dieter Snell.”
Weldon contended: “It was Dieter Snell who did not brief the 9/11 Commission. The 9/11 Commissioners were never briefed on Able Danger.”
Gorelick was the lead Democrat on the 9/11 Commission.
Weldon said Able Danger team members have been “gagged” by the Pentagon and by Defense Intelligence Agency leaders who stand to be embarrassed by their revelations.
“The Defense Intelligence Agency has people who were held over from the previous administration,” he told Fox News. “They were there when [Able Danger] brought forward this information.”
The Pennsylvania Republican said that besides identifying Atta and three other 9/11 hijackers as terrorist threats, Able Danger had warned of the impending attack on the U.S.S. Cole.
“Two weeks before the attack on the U.S.S. Cole,” he told “Hannity & Colmes, “they sensed that something was about to happen in Yemen. Two days before the attack on the Cole - and the arrival of the Cole in harbor - they warned that the ship should not enter the harbor.”
“This information needs to be brought to the public,” Weldon said. “We lost 3,000 people here. This cannot be covered up. This is 3,000 times worse than Watergate.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.