Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Erosion of American Higher Education (cost of College rising faster than inflation)
American Thinker ^ | 10/05/2010 | Bill Costello

Posted on 10/05/2010 8:06:53 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

In America, the cost of higher education has been rising faster than inflation and health care costs for more than two decades. Money Magazine calculated that college tuition rose by 439 percent from 1982-2007.

According to Mark C. Taylor, author of Crisis on Campus: A Bold Plan for Reforming Our Colleges and Universities, four years at a top-tier school will increase from $330,000 in 2020 to $785,000 in 2035 if recent trends continue.

What are colleges and universities spending all that money on? If you think it's on initiatives that improve the quality of education for students, you're wrong.

Andrew Hacker and Claudia Dreifus, authors of Higher Education?: How Colleges are Wasting Our Money and Failing Our Kids -- and What We Can Do About It, write, "The chief reason why costs keep rising is that education has become a minor player in higher education. At public universities, only 28% of spending goes for instruction; private colleges do a bit better at 33%."

Hacker and Dreifus found that the majority of spending goes for costly athletic programs, faculty sabbaticals, research financing, college presidents' salaries, and excessive amenities.

Moreover, administrative bloat has been rising. A new report by the Goldwater Institute found that

[e]nrollment at America’s leading universities has been increasing dramatically, rising nearly 15 percent between 1993 and 2007. But unlike almost every other growing industry, higher education has not become more efficient. Instead, universities now have more administrative employees and spend more on administration to educate each student. In short, universities are suffering from 'administrative bloat,' expanding the resources devoted to administration significantly faster than spending on instruction, research and service.

Between 1993 and 2007, the number of full-time administrators per 100 students at America's leading universities grew by 39 percent, while the number of employees engaged in teaching, research or service only grew by 18 percent. Inflation-adjusted spending on administration per student increased by 61 percent during the same period, while instructional spending per student rose 39 percent.

At the same time the cost of higher education has been rising, the quality of education offered by colleges and universities has been falling.

A study conducted by the nonprofit American Council of Trustees and Alumni (ACTA) found that both public and private universities are failing to require students to learn important subjects.

Furthermore, most college graduates are below proficiency in verbal and quantitative literacy according to the National Center for Education Statistics.

Since 2004, the world's top two hundred universities have been ranked annually by the Times Higher Education-QS World University Rankings. Recently, Asian universities have been making significant gains on America, long considered to have the world's best universities.

In 2008, America had 37 universities in the top one hundred and 58 in the top two hundred. In 2009, that dropped to 32 and 54, respectively -- although twelve of the top sixteen universities in the world are still in America. Between 2008 and 2009, Japan went from ten universities in the top two hundred to eleven, Hong Kong went from four to five, South Korea went from three to four, and mainland China maintained its position with six.

The goal of Asian nations is to create world-class universities that surpass American universities. They have "every prospect of success," argued Yale University President Richard C. Levin in a recent lecture titled "The Rise of Asia's Universities."

To research the higher education revolution occurring in Asia, I visited many of the top universities in Cambodia, mainland China, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, and Vietnam. The growth rate I witnessed was astonishing.

For example, here's what's happening in China: China now has the largest higher education system in the world. Five of its universities are in the world's top one hundred. University enrollment has more than tripled since 2000. More university degrees are awarded in China than in America and India combined. Over the last decade, annual awards of doctoral degrees in China have risen sevenfold. China recently surpassed the U.K. to become the world's second-largest producer of academic research papers, and the nation is on course to surpass America by 2020.

All of this has been accomplished in just three decades. There were only 205 universities in China when Mao Zedong came to power in 1949. They closed down during the turbulent era of the Cultural Revolution from 1966 to 1977. Under Deng Xiaoping, they began to reopen in 1978.

That China could reform its higher education institutions so rapidly suggests that America could do the same.

If American higher education institutions do not find ways to improve resource allocation, lower tuition prices, and provide a higher quality of education, then there will be a series of negative consequences for the nation and its citizens.

First, fewer Americans will earn higher education degrees. With tuition costs rising and the quality of education falling, increasing numbers of Americans will question whether or not they would receive a significant return on their investment.

Second, many higher education institutions will collapse from a shrinking pool of customers, dwindling government support, and increasing levels of debt.

Third, fewer Americans will be prepared to succeed in the increasingly global economy. In America, this will ultimately lead to growing unemployment rates, a decline in Gross Domestic Product, unsustainable levels of national debt, and reduced military capability.

That is truly a high price to pay.

Bill Costello, M.Ed., is the president of U.S.-based Making Minds Matter, LLC and the author of Awaken Your Birdbrain: Using Creativity to Get What You Want. He can be reached at www.makingmindsmatter.com.



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: academia; college; cost; education; highereducation; inflation

1 posted on 10/05/2010 8:06:59 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

It is not so much the cost of an education that is worrisome (education costs were always expensive), but it is the college and university curriculums and the tenured ultraliberal professors that are the REAL problem.

Colleges and universities are turning out a bunch of propagandized, brainwashed, indoctrinated ultraliberal zombie sheep and because of that, these young men and women will not be able to function or succeed in the real world (unless they join the military).

Unions and their leaders are the real reason that schools in America are failing and failing miserably.


2 posted on 10/05/2010 8:11:42 AM PDT by Ev Reeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

cheap and easy student loans = higher tuition costs. It’s not rocket science here. There’s a huge education bubble and too many kids are going to have to default on student loans they can’t afford.


3 posted on 10/05/2010 8:13:46 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
University Education in America = bubble

$200,000 in student debt for a communication degree to get a job at $35,000 = bubble

4 posted on 10/05/2010 8:17:26 AM PDT by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

There is a cost/value equation that is reasonable at the service academies, vocational and online schools. I agree with the author that the curricula at most public and liberal arts colleges and universities is ill-suited for the current competitive environment. In many cases, these schools have become vanities for university administrators, wealthy alumni and elite, insular professors. In addition, the value proposition is absurd. Some graduate degrees—like an MBA—cannot be cost-justified (I have one, as well as a JD, but from a more affordable time).

I suspect that the days of apprenticing under a wizard (a well-specified way to learn) will return.


5 posted on 10/05/2010 8:17:38 AM PDT by Zebra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

When I was a professor at a state university in the 1980’s, I was full time. That meant ten hours teaching per week, twenty eight weeks per year. No requirements for publishing or research! They rearranged my schedule so I only had to come to campus Tues. & Thurs.

I’ll admit, I was overpaid due to the unionized faculty. I felt guilty taking my paycheck and used to joke that I would never get a real job after this. Problem was, my private practice grew too big and I could not handle the demands of a litigation schedule and be tied to a class schedule, thus I had to quit teaching.

I agree, higher education is a ripoff. However, it is still cheaper than the cost per student for our local high school education that is terrible.


6 posted on 10/05/2010 8:17:45 AM PDT by tired&retired
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ev Reeman

RE: Colleges and universities are turning out a bunch of propagandized, brainwashed, indoctrinated ultraliberal zombie sheep and because of that, these young men and women will not be able to function or succeed in the real world (unless they join the military).


Well what can I say ? Even conservatives get a share of the blame here... where do you think these tenured ultra-liberal professors get their salaries to continue doign what they’re doing ?

Answers: From people who CONTINUE sending their kids to these schools. Even conservative parents who know better scrape and save money in order to be able to afford to send their kids to these colleges that IN MOST CASES, have liberal professors. In other words, by sending our kids to these schools, we are in effect sending them a signal : “Continue doing what you’re doing, we’ll send our kids to your schools regardless.”

It is said that self-identifying conservatives in America outnumber liberals by close to 2-1 ( last I saw, the survey shows something like 43% to 24% ).

The question then becomes — Why aren’t there more conservatives sending their children to conservative colleges ? ( and there are lots of them ).

We ought to first, ask ourselves this question before we complain, because we might be part of the problem.


7 posted on 10/05/2010 8:21:35 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
That's to force the non-minority kids need to take out loans that to pay for "scholarships" given to minority kids.

Reparations.

8 posted on 10/05/2010 8:23:52 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("The only stable state is one in which all men are equal before the law." -- Aristotle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2banana

RE: $200,000 in student debt for a communication degree


What school is that ?

The only one I can think of in New York City is NYU ( tuition plus board close to $50,000 ). But then, a lot are eligible for some form of aid which cuts it down to less than $40,000 per year ( still less than $200,000 after 4 years ).


9 posted on 10/05/2010 8:24:12 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2banana

Exactly, the value of that education is not keeping up with the cost.


10 posted on 10/05/2010 8:26:01 AM PDT by WAW (Which enumerated power?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ev Reeman

Let us not jump straight to hyperbole to explain the university systems in this nation. Not all of the institutions of higher learning are indoctrination mills. As a matter of fact, many universities have so-called neutrality rules that force professors to stick to lesson plans. Unfortunately those lesson plans can be developed to indoctrinate, but in my years at Florida State, I never heard excessive liberalism being spouted.

Also, remember that many college students become enlightened at some point during or after college. I was in the College Republicans and participated in get out the vote drives for Republican candidates in 2000. Some of us cling bitterly to our upbringing, and I personally just took what they said with a grain of salt, learned the materials, and finished with a degree.

However, while I have railed against the naysayers in the past, I am starting to believe that the utility of college education is on the wane. Kids are leaving with liberal arts degrees and no practical knowledge to apply to the job market. Thus, they are remaining unemployed, and the universities are scrambling to place graduates in entry-level jobs. Obviously, they are unable to find jobs for every graduate.

Between the ultra-liberal social politics of university educators and the often nonsensical policies on the books, it is no wonder college is not only becoming financially unobtainable but practically useless for a majority of graduates.


11 posted on 10/05/2010 8:37:20 AM PDT by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rhombus
cheap and easy student loans = higher tuition costs.

Certainly there is one Economist at one institution who understands Econ 101.

12 posted on 10/05/2010 8:41:35 AM PDT by Fundamentally Fair (If exercising the right to free speech invites violence, then girls in short skirts invite rape.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Fundamentally Fair
Certainly there is one Economist at one institution who understands Econ 101.

Oh but it makes people feeeeeeel so good to help people get an educaiton.

13 posted on 10/05/2010 8:45:09 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
educators do not know how to reduce expenses:

- when things are tight they build more buildings meaning more maintenance, staff, etc.
- teaching staff get annual raises and assistants, reduced work loads, and more.
- all departments are overstaffed
- they specialize in waste, supply economy is a foreign concept
- and on and on

14 posted on 10/05/2010 10:39:33 AM PDT by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-Qaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elpadre

RE: educators do not know how to reduce expenses:


Are these things also true for those who teach economics, business management and business/public administration?


15 posted on 10/05/2010 10:43:37 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
I spent many years in heavy industry. Reducing waste and improving quality were a constant drumbeat.
16 posted on 10/05/2010 11:03:35 AM PDT by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-Qaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: rarestia

The only thing a liberal arts degree will get somebody is a one way ticket to flipping burgers at McDonalds.


17 posted on 10/06/2010 9:54:57 AM PDT by Ev Reeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Ev Reeman

I have a BA in English, an MA in English, and I’m a data center engineer. Let’s not cast the lowly Lib Arts degree to the wolves so quickly.


18 posted on 10/06/2010 10:16:00 AM PDT by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson