Posted on 10/07/2010 3:20:54 PM PDT by jazusamo
Complete title: Beef Industry: U.S. May Need ‘Strategic Hamburger Reserve’ after Obama EPA Implements New Regulations
Washington (CNSNews.com) – According to a representative of the cattle and beef industry, America may need a “strategic hamburger reserve” if the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) implements proposed new reguilations for cattle producers.
“From where I sit, (the Obama administration) appears to be aimed at destroying the cattle industry in America as we know it,” Tamara Thies, the chief environmental counsel at the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association, said on Capitol Hill last week.
“It is ironic that as we work to become less dependent on foreign oil, Obama policies are likely to make us more dependent on foreign beef. Maybe we’ll need to start a strategic hamburger reserve after the Obama administration is finished with us.”
Thies' comments came at a hearing conducted by the House Republicans’ Rural America Solutions Group about the EPA’s proposed regulations on the industry, which include the toughest dust regulations in history – one which would significantly impact the rural economy by imposing steep fines on cattle producers who, Thies said, most likely cannot afford them.
“It is unlikely these realities are lost on the EPA, making one wonder if the real goal of the agency is to do away altogether with economic activity throughout the bread basket of this country and turn it into a vast national park,” she added.
The forum was held by Reps. Frank Lucas (R-Okla.), ranking member on the House Agriculture Committee; Sam Graves (R-Mo.), ranking member of the House Small Business subcommittee; and Doc Hastings (R-Wash.), ranking member of the House Natural Resources Committee, to consider several of the new proposed EPA regulations.
In a periodic review of its National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), which allow the EPA to regulate certain forms of particulate matter in the air, the EPA determined that it might raise the standard so that only 65-85 µg/m3 of dust would be permitted in the air (as opposed to 150 µg/m3). Violating the proposed new NAAQS standards can result in civil penalties under the Clean Air Act.
The EPA published that draft policy assessment in the July 8, 2010 issue of the Federal Register.
“(EPA) is preparing to issue a proposed regulation that is twice as stringent as the current dust standard, and is more stringent than background levels of dust in many parts of the U.S,” Thies told the congressmen.
“Incredibly, we are talking about dust kicked up by tilling fields and harvesting crops, cattle movements, and pickups driving down dirt roads,”she said. “For agriculture, the current standard is already very difficult and costly to meet—doubling it would be virtually impossible.”
That new proposal also alarmed 75 members of Congress who represent rural districts, including Reps. Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.), Stephanie Herseth-Sandlin (D-S.D.), John Spratt (D-S.C.), and Bobby Bright (D-Ala.), who sent a letter to EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson on Sept. 27 urging the agency to “refrain from going down this path” on dust regulation.
“Considering the administration’s claim that it is focusing on revitalizing rural America and rural economic development, a proposal such as this would have a significant negative impact on those very goals,” they wrote. “We are hopeful that common sense will prevail and the EPA will refrain from causing extreme hardship to farmers, livestock producers, and other resource-based industries throughout rural America.
“Whether it is livestock kicking up dust, corn being combined, or a pickup driving down a gravel road, dust is a naturally occurring event in rural areas. Common sense requires the EPA to acknowledge that the wind blows dust around in these areas, and that is a fact of life.”
Jackson did not attend the forum on Capitol Hill last week despite receiving an invitation. A spokesperson for the EPA indicated they would have a reaction about why they were proposing these rules in a difficult economy, but did not do so by press time.
The dust regulation is one of several new proposals the EPA is considering, including regulating ammonia emissions from cattle operations; nationalizing standards for soil phosphorus levels, which determine where farmers can use manure; regulating greenhouse gas emissions; and greater regulation of farming on the Chesapeake Bay watershed.
“The fact is, the EPA is waging an unprecedented war to end modern production of animal agriculture,” Thies said in her testimony.
“EPA exhibits reckless indifference to scientific fact and, instead, imposes stringent regulations based on nothing more than its biased anti-animal agriculture agenda that will leave many cattle operations with no recourse but to shut down and eliminate jobs,” she added.
I agree, that’s what should be done and done as soon as the RATS lose the House, then do away with the EPA as soon as we can.
I’m trying to keep track of the industries Obama’s EPA seems intent on killing. So far, as best I can recall, the list includes cement manufacturers, oil refiners, users of industrial boilers, cattle ranchers, and pretty much any industrial or agricultural activity in the watershed that feeds the Cheasapeake. I’m sure there are more. Those are just the ones I recall reading about.
I so hate obama you have no idea.
beat me to it lol
The second thing for the Republicans to do when they take over Congress is to defund the EPA. Cut off their money, give them NADA!! Of course, the first thing still remains - start issuing subpoenas.
“What ISN’T Obama trying to destroy these days?”
Was thinking the same thing. Can’t come up with a single US industry the obamanation’s administration isn’t actively working to destroy or take over.
Mining? Energy? Farming? Auto? Cement and concrete? Cattle? Light bulbs? Insurance? Health care? Yup, they’re all in the cross hairs.
Sure I missed some. And then he’s claiming to be pro-business lately. Delusional!
The left wrote the book on how to fight the government. The National Beef Association needs to man up and sue the EPA at every turn. If they loose file an appeal and another suit for something else. Tie them up in litigation and FOIA demands until they pick an easier target.
Has the EPA completed a comprehensive environmental impact study that includes the economic impact of their new regulations? That’s the first place to start.
Clearly the lunatics are running the asylum at EPA.
It is TIME to DownSize DC!
Eliminate entire departments! Starting the the Federal Department of Education and the Environmental Protection Agency.
If you evaluated them honestly on the cost benefit basis neither would have a positive value. In the case of both, the Nation would be better off if they did not exist at all.....
Dust Regulations.
Yeah, I’m familiar with that.
In CA. you can’t use a dozer/tractor if the wind is coming from a certain direction.
If you have dirt exposed you have to cover it with hay so dirt doesn’t get onto the road way.
You can also be fined (heavily) if dirt gets into a water way.
Like the unions, NAACP, and the ADL, the EPA once did some good things. But over the years, it's morphed into a part of the government that exerts far too much control over our lives. I realized that the EPA can't be "fixed" when they declared CO2 a threat to "public health."
Mark
going = doing
When that happens, their inspectors will go out and never be heard from again.
It will reach a breaking point, but when? It will be when so many backs are against the wall there is no other place to retreat to. This is do the loss of the American spirit of fighting back and standing up for what is right. We are intimidated by the law, the legal system, the players, the media, the schools, etc. and this is the end result.
So while I agree that this will break at some point, I believe the people will take much more of it before they can no longer bear it. However I believe that it will be to late by then. The economy will be in a hyperinflation, goods and services will be hard to come by in a country of 300+ million people. That is a very lethal combination. Then our enemies overseas will be salivating while we fall on our own sword. At some point they will be tempted to finish the job if the opportunity arise.
Reading stuff like this, nothing would please me more than communist politicians starving to death. Those damned monsters are sowing the wind, but will reap the whirlwind.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.