Posted on 10/09/2010 7:48:37 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd
I’d vote for it but, sadly, it won’t pass in Texas.
Weren’t the Trial Lawyers behind the push in states to reduce the limit to .08?
They (government) want more money. It’s as simple as that. These people have never heard of the law of diminishing returns.
I have some wishes for law enforcement:
Start serving and protecting
You have turned into unmitigated bullies and asses
The Austin police chief is not “Texas officers.” It’s the Austin police chief.
9 times out of 10 law enforcement is a euphemism for tax collection.
In my (not so) humble opinion, any law based on an arbitrary number is defacto immoral - the focus ought be on safety and smooth flow.
Of course, there isn’t any money to be made with that, so it’ll never happen stateside.
Herr Acivedo continues his campaign for Reichsführer of Travis County.
He's on the radio a lot down here, and the polite demeanor and friendly disposition with which he describes whatever his new draconian policy of the week is quite disturbing.
I heard he was interviewing for the PC's spot in Dallas; please let him be gone soon.
this is probably because of sloppy police work at trial is resulting in dimissials and prosecutors are dealing with piss poor cases.
it is also about generating revenue.
The standard BAC for a drunk driving charge is .08%.
Which is a total scam as it is since .08% is not likely going to make you a less safe driver, merely increase opportunities for state revenue enhancement.
The old .1% standard really didn't make you that unsafe a driver but at least was reasonable cut off in that two beers at dinner wouldn't get you there.
At .05, having ever had an alcoholic drink in your life will qualify.
I bet you didn't know this, but you can be CONVICTED of a DUI with a 0.00 BAC.
DING DING DING DING
We have a winner.
.08 is not even close to drunk for most people
It comes under 'reasonable suspicion'. Small towns everywhere see a funding bonanza.
I got an idea:
How about pulling over drivers who exhibit impairment, whether the impairment occurs from drinking, drugs, texting, doing your makeup, reading a book, yakking with your friends on the phone, etc etc etc.
Oh I know it would never happen - it would require actual work. Zero tolerance and checkpoints are much easier.
But if your family has enough influence and money, you can bury your car upside down in a tidal river, leaving a woman to drown, and be declared the 'Lion of the Senate'.
Yes and MADD, this entire DWI process has been a cash cow for the trial bar.
They try it all the time in FL. You still get you license pull until after court which could take months. Actually, in FL the DMV (polics) pulls your license (a year BTW) and if convicted the Judge will pull you license. Why this isn’t double jeopardy I don’t understand. If you not convicted you get it back, by that time you have spent 3K to 4K maybe more.
Yeah, I read about that in the papers almost every day;
funny thing though: most of the drunks are also illegals...
Seems one law doesn't mean any more to them than another.
No kidding...
And it just happens that Travis County is facing a budget shortfall!
They ought to raise the limit...probably above .10. Maybe .12 or higher. I don’t drink, but if I can drive legally when tired, then one drink shouldn’t disqualify someone.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.