Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/10/2010 1:12:45 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: BenLurkin

2 posted on 10/10/2010 1:24:08 PM PDT by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

There could be a 10.0 anywhere else in California but if it doesn’t happen in LA it won’t be called the ‘Big One’.


3 posted on 10/10/2010 1:26:25 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

If Pelosi can be anywhere near it, and fall into a giant fissure never to be seen again, I’m ok with that.


5 posted on 10/10/2010 1:27:32 PM PDT by Keith in Iowa (FR Class of 1998 | TV News is an oxymoron. | MSNBC = Moonbats Spouting Nothing But Crap.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin
“The next earthquake could be sooner than later,” said Lisa Grant Ludwig of UC Irvine, who helped write the study.

And to think that we pay people for this "brilliant" bull$#!t !!!

6 posted on 10/10/2010 1:27:43 PM PDT by airborne (Why is it we won't allow the Bible in school, but we will in prison? Think about it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin
“The next earthquake could be sooner than later,” said Lisa Grant Ludwig of UC Irvine, who helped write the study. U.S. Geological Survey seismologist Lucy Jones, who was not involved in the study, said it was possible that the entire southern San Andreas fault could rupture.

Teaming up for the next grant?

7 posted on 10/10/2010 1:27:46 PM PDT by mazda77 (Rubio - US Senate, West FL22nd, Scott/Carroll - FL Gov/LtGov, Miller-AK US Senate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin
“The next earthquake could be sooner than later,” said Lisa Grant Ludwig of UC Irvine, who helped write the study.

Then again, there's always the possibility that it could be later than sooner.
It all depends on which one comes first, sooner or later or later or sooner.

But it's a pretty safe bet that Lisa's Nobel Prize is gonna be later, not sooner.

8 posted on 10/10/2010 1:30:08 PM PDT by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Ho, ho. Duct tape’s got this one.


9 posted on 10/10/2010 1:39:09 PM PDT by righttackle44 (I may not be much, but I raised a United States Marine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

I see no reason for California to exist as a state in today’s world. Time for all good Christians, Conservatives, and people who love this country to bug out and move elsewhere. Stop feeding the beast.


13 posted on 10/10/2010 1:45:16 PM PDT by My Favorite Headache (In a world where I feel so small, I can't stop thinking big.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

I live in Ventura County, CA. NONE of my neighbors are prepared for anything.


14 posted on 10/10/2010 1:45:22 PM PDT by barbarianbabs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

The Pacific Rim Ring of Fire has been very busy in the last few years. I would not be surprised at all for the San Andreas Fault to make a move in the next 10 years. There has been a whole lot of shaken going on around it but none on the fault itself. A little too quiet.


15 posted on 10/10/2010 1:46:07 PM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

The last major rupture on the San Andreas was the 1906 San Francisco quake. The last major socal ruputure was the 1857 Fort Tejon quake.


17 posted on 10/10/2010 1:50:39 PM PDT by HerrBlucher (Defund, repeal, investigate, impeach, convict, jail, celebrate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Geez, that ought to take care of our oversupply of housing.


18 posted on 10/10/2010 1:52:17 PM PDT by umgud (Wear your Border Patrol hats to the polls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin
So outlawing incandescent light bulbs didn't help?

Isn't there something that can be taxed to reduce seismic activity?

Or hey, wait a minute...does this have something to do with Barry lowering the sea levels?


Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.

23 posted on 10/10/2010 2:29:41 PM PDT by The Comedian (Keep talking while I reload...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin
The 340-mile, southern section of the San Andreas fault could slip at anytime, triggering a massive, magnitude 8.1 quake, researchers announced Sunday........the fault is long overdue for a major quake"

It (the "big one") has been reported as due "anytime" and "long overdue" for the last fifty years. I expect that reporting to not change in the next fifty years.

While the general mechanics of earthquakes are understood, the science of the geologic specifics for accurately identifying and predicting their next occurrences is presently in the kindergarten stage.

24 posted on 10/10/2010 2:31:44 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Well, yeah, and the New Madrid COULD go any day and is “overdue” for a major rupture. I expect the same could be said for 90% of the major fault lines in the world. (Chili and Sumatra being the obvious exceptions)


25 posted on 10/10/2010 2:39:17 PM PDT by brothers4thID (http://scarlettsays.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

The “big one” has been said to come any second now since I was a kid in the seventies.

You just live your life and quit worrying.
I figure it’s just as likely to not happen in my lifetime as well or be much less then they thought.

Now I wouldn’t live in LA or the Bay area, there are places that you definately do not want to be.


26 posted on 10/10/2010 3:09:52 PM PDT by Names Ash Housewares ( Refusing to kneel before the "messiah".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin
Experts Say The ‘Big One’ Will Be Even Bigger

"October surprise"?

Maybe in 3012. They've been promising this would happen for years and it's been as evasive as "Global Warming".

27 posted on 10/10/2010 3:20:18 PM PDT by Caipirabob ( Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

I’ve always wondered why they call it a “fault”.


29 posted on 10/10/2010 4:42:03 PM PDT by LurkedLongEnough
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 75thOVI; aimhigh; Alice in Wonderland; AndrewC; aragorn; aristotleman; Avoiding_Sulla; BBell; ...
The 340-mile, southern section of the San Andreas fault could slip at anytime, triggering a massive, magnitude 8.1 quake, researchers announced Sunday.
Of course, that headline could have run at anytime since the great SF quake. :') Thanks BenLurkin.
 
Catastrophism
 
· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · subscribe ·
 

34 posted on 10/11/2010 5:28:13 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin
Until recently, experts believed that the section of the fault through the Carrizo Plain, located approximately 100 miles northwest of Los Angeles, would remain dormant for at least another century

There has been virtually no activity on the San Andreas between the Cajon Pass and Parkfield for quite a while. Tick, Tick ... Tick.

This may be the only October Surprise the Democrats might get.

36 posted on 10/11/2010 10:21:06 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (11/2/10-Obama: Close your eyes and think of Kenya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson