Posted on 10/12/2010 2:55:41 PM PDT by thecodont
"It was just a feel-good thing," Ms. Weise said. "It's silly."
What’s the ruling when EVERYONE that disagrees is not allowed and the only crowd is hand picked numbskulls ?
The Supreme Court turned down a lawsuit today against aides to former President George W. Bush for having ejected a Colorado woman from one of his public speeches because her car had a bumper sticker that said "No More Blood for Oil." By a 7-2 vote, the court let stand a ruling that held the president is free to select his audience at public speeches and to have his aides remove persons who may disagree with him. Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor dissented, saying the Constitution does not permit officials to exclude persons simply "for holding discordant views.""unless of course it's done proactively, such as the way Obama's aides preselect all attendees to all his public appearances. And of course, any Democrat is also good to go."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.