“If your logic were correct, a child of illegal immigrants could be POTUS.”
Nope. The parents have to be here “in amity” - in harmony - with the government.
Have you read the DISSENT to WKA? It complains, “Considering the circumstances surrounding the framing of the Constitution, I submit that it is unreasonable to conclude that “natural-born citizen” applied to everybody born within the geographical tract known as the United States, irrespective of circumstances, and that the children of foreigners, happening to be born to them while passing through the country, whether of royal parentage or not, or whether of the Mongolian, Malay or other race, were eligible to the Presidency, while children of our citizens, born abroad, were not.”
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0169_0649_ZD.html
Although I’m not a birther, the dissent is an excellent read. However, it is also the DISSENT.
I was going to say, the Disscent isn’t law.
The NBC clause has never been defined [in terms of law] yet we know by common sense what the Founding Fathers had in mind. A favorite trick of liberal lawyers...AKA perverts.
You twist arguments, lie and otherwise defend the enemy and wonder why you are labeled a troll.
Who's side are you on?
It sure isn't America's
You post in the company of people like jameses777 who is a documented anti FReeper (Liberal hack) WTF is the matter with you?
The NBC clause definition is tenuous at best yet you side with Obama, what's up with that?
Tell us why you defend the man who is a marxist, is stealing this Countries future and its traditions......please tell us all why you defend him so.
I'd relly like to know.
Prediction, don't give me any bullshit how this is a Country of laws.
How many FReepers are you FRiends with and have met with.....none....none I'd bet.
I'm going to do my best to be at the Tea Party here in Vegas tomorrow and have the opportunity to meet with JimRob.....what will you be doing?
You'll be on this same thread defending your man....disgusting fool that you are.