Posted on 10/15/2010 9:03:59 AM PDT by jaydubya2
If you’d been in a CVS in Los Angeles during 2008, you might have witnessed people coming into the store and clearing the store’s shelves of cough and cold medicines. It also might have occurred to you that they weren’t just facing a bad case of the sniffles.
According to federal prosecutors in L.A., those folks were “smurfing”: making “multiple purchases of pseudoephedrine in small amounts with the intent to aggregate the purchases for use in the illegal production of methamphetamine.” And CVS became smurfing central as those folks discovered that those stores, “unlike other large chain retail pharmacies, allowed customers to make repeated purchases of pseudoephedrine that exceeded federal daily and monthly sales limits,” the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Central District of California says.
That big whoopsy-daisy is costing CVS $75 million in civil fines (and the estimated $2.6 million it made on the medications).
(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.wsj.com ...
Jeez....Lawyers are going to make it so you need security clearence and dozen forms of ID to buy some dang cold meds.....
My Grandfather was a wholesale grocer during WWII. He had many sales of bulk sugar with ration cards and all to the local bootleggers. Where there is a will, there is a way.
That law that made it tougher to sell Pseudoephedrine just helped the Communist Chinese and the Mexican Drug Cartels.
The ChiComs are the biggest maker of Pseudophedrine...and the Mexican Cartels use the ChiCom P-eph to cook up the Meth.
There is still just as much meth out there than before the restriction....instead of some rural American cooking up Meth...it is now the Mexican cartels
Anyone with allergies prefers Pseudophedrine over the PE crap. The Pseudophedrine ban just helped out the ChiComs and the Mexican Drug Cartels
only an idiot would blame lawyers for this.
Which are found where in the Consitution?
This stuff is handled just fine at the state level.
It's just a tax excuse.
It is already that way. I went to CVS to get my wife some Sudafed so she could breathe and I had to show my drivers' license and sign a "statement." A royal hassle.
That's already in place. I had a bad cold a couple years ago and went to buy some of the stronger cold medicine. It was kept behind the counter and I had to show ID. It was all recorded in their computer.
I hated the medicine. All I took was one pill and the effects were worse than the cold. It made me jittery and unable to sleep. Nasty stuff. I returned it the next day.
And with all the hassle, is there less meth on the street or more? The govenment never admits what it does is wrong, it only claims it hasn’t done enough of it yet.... nothing learns slower than government....
And who are you blaming?
American owned pharmaceutical companies sell many times more of ephedrin and pseudo-ephedrin to Mexican “companies” than is need to produce cold medicine. There was a Frontline special on that documenting the trail directly to US based companies. I have never heard of the Chi-coms being involved, but it makes sense also.
phenylephrine sucks...
that’s all I have to say.
Maybe hard labor? I have allergy and sinus issues and it is a pain to buy these meds due to those tweekers, I think Id like to see the tweekers have to clean up parks and stuff for making life hard for the average people who need those meds.
Honestly, I'd rather the Mexicans cook this crap up than my neighbor.
They have to be kidding. It has to be much cheaper and more efficient to ‘import’ pseudoephedrine through MS 13.
Just another excuse to extend the nanny state and collect some ‘protection’ money from CVS.
The federal daily limit is 3.6 grams of pseudoephedrine; monthly limit is 7.5 grams of pseudoephedrine.
(one 10 tablet box of adult 24 hour 240mg pseudoephedrine = 2.4 grams)
FYI this is part of the Patriot Act signed by GW.
I blame drug warriors.
Make everyone a criminal, to stop a few from abusing a legal substance.
$75 million is nothing to sneeze at.
lawmakers who pander to those who clamor for more and more restrictions to try to solve an unsolvable problem. Some of those legislators might be lawyers, but that has nothing to do with it. So I blame big government and those that want such control exerted over their lives.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.