Posted on 10/15/2010 4:38:53 PM PDT by Conservative Coulter Fan
“Scientific American” is neither “scientific” or “american”.
They have jumped the shark.
They want to use the Magnum on 3 billion people....they just are not going to own up to it (yet) until they get total control of the world. Then all hell will break loose and their mask will be removed and you will see the face of Satan.
Instead of terminating the lives of the innocent, wouldn’t it be better if all the Warmists did the honorable thing and stopped emitting CO2?
Life is a gift of God. They hate God, they hate life, they hate anyone who loves life. I’m living a good life even when we are in the middle of an depression that was caused by these same stupid people.
We, conservatives love God, His Son Jesus Christ, our Constitution, our great country, our families and ourselves. That’s is what really wee-wee’s them off. We will not be shaken nor moved. It is great knowing that we are right. Someday these fools will be held accountable, it will not be pretty. Something about gnashing of teeth...........
BTTT!
It’s auto-genocide (or geno-suicide.) And those who see and speak the truth are called crazy.
Perfect solution for everyone.
Let the liberals drink the koolaid.
The world would be improved by 80% overnight.
If they are trying to cut the population, then UNSAFE abortions would be even better with both the mother and the child dying. And then probably more husbands would kill themselves and their teenage kids would do the same. Just what they are looking for! Also, take the seatbelts and airbags out of cars and take down all traffic signs, guard rails, bridge railings, and get rid of brakes on cars.
I believe that Agenda 21 calls for a 90 percent reduction in the world’s population. They have big plans for us.
Yep. Another reason I haven't bought an issue of Scientific American in decades.
It's so silly, really. Surely we could identify some un-likeable people somewhere on the planet, nuke them out of existence, let the land go back to pristine nature, and the extra particulates in the atmosphere would help bring the tempearture down. Just lather, rinse, and repeat until the desired result is achieved. This would also achieve the leftist goal of eliminating nuclear weapons (well, some of them, anyway.)
What's not to like?
(/mega sarcasm)
Actually, the Left prefers killing the helpless one baby at a time, impoverishing the survivors, and tormenting the living for the 'crime' of existing. It serves their master better.
They wouldn't go for that solution, because it would only give some extra work to the "militarists" while doing nothing to enhance their own revenue stream. Abortion, OTOH, is a gold mine for them.
They will not be in favor of any "solution" that leaves them with less power or privilege, and that is the bottom line.
"An additional 150 people join the ranks of humanity every minute, a pace that could lead our numbers to reach nine billion by 2050," Biello wrote. "Changing that peak population number alone could save at least 1.4 billion metric tons of carbon from entering the atmosphere each year by 2050, according to a new analysis -- the equivalent of cutting more than 10 percent of fossil fuel burning per year."Let's start saving -- Biello and the editors and publisher of so-called "Scientific American" can give up their livelihoods and ways of life and be sent to an island for the rest of their lives, as Napoleon was.
 |
||
| · join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · subscribe · | ||
The left hates rich people. They think if they could eliminate 90% of the world's population, their envy level would be brought down to a manageable level. The city dwellers could also lower their envy by moving out of their anthill to the country where humans are used to living, where their nearest neighbor with a shiny new car is a mile away.
Human life is Earth's greatest achievement. Leftists always ignore how new technology solves problems. Because of humans no plant or animal alive today will ever go extinct again, and many that have gone extinct will be brought back to life.
Just my opinion of course.
I stopped buying Scientific American when, between it’s environmentalist articles and it’s anti-religious articles, it became clear that left-wing politics trumped science there.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.