Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP House Leaders Seek to Avoid Mistakes of '94 [We need to tell them HELL NO!!]
The Wall Street Journal ^ | October 19, 2010 | Naftali Bendavid

Posted on 10/19/2010 10:33:15 AM PDT by DestroyLiberalism

PORTLAND, Ore.—Republicans on the campaign trail are bashing the president and his agenda and some are vowing to shut down Washington if they don't get their way. Behind the scenes, key party members are talking a different game.

A number of House Republicans, including some who are likely to be in the leadership, are pushing a post-election strategy aimed at securing concrete legislation, with the goal of showing they can translate general principles into specific action.

Among the ideas is to bring a series of bills to the floor, as often as once a week, designed to cut spending in some way. Longer term, GOP leaders say they recognize they may have to compromise with Democrats in tackling broader problems.

If they recapture the House, Republicans say they are wary of following the example of the class of 1994, which shut down the government in a standoff with President Bill Clinton. Top Republicans contend that passing legislation, or at least making a good faith effort to do so, will earn them more credibility with voters than refusing to waver from purist principles. Races in 2010

"It's pretty clear the American people expect us to use the existing gridlock to create compromise and advance their agenda," said Rep. Darrell Issa (R., Calif.). "They want us to come together [with the administration] after we agree to disagree."

GOP leaders stressed that this depends on the willingness of President Barack Obama to compromise as well. And some say if the post-election atmosphere is especially toxic, such compromises may be difficult.

The approach stands in contrast to the Senate, where Republican nominees including Kentucky's Rand Paul and Nevada's Sharron Angle more clearly represent the anti-establishment instincts of the tea-party movement.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: compromise; darrellissa; gopestablishment; houseleader; issa; obama; palin; republicans
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
This needs to be front page news. After the ENORMOUS and tireless time, money, and effort we patriotic conservatives have spent over the past two years trying to secure a House and Senate majority necessary for the Republican party to bring the Obama administration's radical left-wing agenda to a screeching halt, we absolutely CANNOT allow the inside-the-beltway GOP establishment to ruin and destroy this by compromising with the Dems.

Rush Limbaugh is LIVID at the GOP "leadership" over this story and has been blasting them during his entire radio show today. We need to amplify our voices as well and perhaps it's time to start flooding representatives like Darrell Issa, John Boehner, and Mitch McConnell with some phone calls and e-mails. This reach-across-the-aisle-and-compromise-with-America's-enemies approach CANNOT be allowed to stand for one minute longer!

1 posted on 10/19/2010 10:33:19 AM PDT by DestroyLiberalism
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DestroyLiberalism

Once again revealing their true colors as the party of Democrat lite.

There can be no compromise with a group of horrors dedicated to the destruction of the American way of life.

Start by ending USAID, the Dept of Education, and the Dept of Homeland Security (splitting its functions up between the FBI and CIA as needed). Next up, is the BATF.


2 posted on 10/19/2010 10:36:01 AM PDT by Yet_Again
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DestroyLiberalism

These gentlemen had better start paying attention.

We want leadership - not pussyfooting.

Period.


3 posted on 10/19/2010 10:36:15 AM PDT by RexBeach ("There is no such thing as a good tax." Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DestroyLiberalism

A losing position: being too willing to compromise.


4 posted on 10/19/2010 10:36:24 AM PDT by A. Morgan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DestroyLiberalism

We all must write to our “Leaders” and remind them where to go — Repealville!


5 posted on 10/19/2010 10:38:36 AM PDT by fullchroma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DestroyLiberalism
If we win big, then perhaps the Compromising should start with the Democrats:

How much are they willing to cut from obamacare?
How much are they willing to restrict abortion?
How much are they willing to cut the federal budget? 10%? 20%?

What? They aren't willing to compromise on any of that??? Well, then I guess I don't want to compromise either.

6 posted on 10/19/2010 10:39:05 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DestroyLiberalism

Didn’t someone just try to get elected President by saying this?


7 posted on 10/19/2010 10:39:36 AM PDT by OKSooner (Obama confessed "his muslim faith" on the George Stephanopolous show on September 7th, 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DestroyLiberalism

Well, this is their last chance. Either wake up and figure out what’s going on, or the party will die and all these hacks will be shoveled into the dust bin of history.

The time is now. Time has run out. No more time. Wake up or the party dies. NOW.

I’m afraid they’ve already showed their true colors in Delaware. They know that if O’Donnell wins, the party hacks will lose their jobs. So, they’d rather do anything to make her lose. Well, that is no longer an option. Won’t work any longer.


8 posted on 10/19/2010 10:39:54 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DestroyLiberalism

The only “compromise” that should even be discussed is the same courtesy of “compromise” the RATs showed them!

What’s with these clowns?! Snatching defeat from the jaws of victory again?!


9 posted on 10/19/2010 10:40:05 AM PDT by Sister_T ("Calling ILLEGAL aliens "immigrants" is like calling shoplifters 'customers'!"-UCFRoadWarrior ><>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DestroyLiberalism

No, no - they should compromise with us, not the other way around.

This is going to have to be a tsunami - not only for the numbers on paper that would send a message, but because that would mean more fresh blood (brand new members of Congress not tainted by the inside the beltway mode of thinking).


10 posted on 10/19/2010 10:40:11 AM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yet_Again

These next two years may be the final two years for the GOP. RINOs are politicians before they are anything else.


11 posted on 10/19/2010 10:41:01 AM PDT by AD from SpringBay (We deserve the government we allow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DestroyLiberalism
Among the ideas is to bring a series of bills to the floor, as often as once a week, designed to cut spending in some way.

This is a good thing, and I fully support it. Even if those bills fail or are filibustered/vetoed, it shows the new congress is serious about trying to address problems. I hope these bills are not all symbolic fluff-cutting; I want some bills with serious cuts included in this flurry.

Longer term, GOP leaders say they recognize they may have to compromise with Democrats in tackling broader problems.

This on the other hand is a little unsettling. Politics are of course the art of compromise, but after all we have gone through, they had better not start compromising on our core principals. The article is a little vague on what is specifically meant by this - it could be a trial ballon for traditional GOP surrender, or it could be simply a statement to shut up early complaints from the left. But it feels more likely to be bad than good.

12 posted on 10/19/2010 10:41:31 AM PDT by AzSteven ("War is less costly than servitude, the choice is always between Verdun and Dachau." Jean Dutourd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

If the Republicans don’t at least force some cloture votes and vetos, if they go right into compromise mode, they will become the Whigs of the 21st Century.


13 posted on 10/19/2010 10:42:06 AM PDT by p. henry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: A. Morgan
This is NOT the time for compromise or to be reaching ‘across the aisle’ to our rat ‘friends’. This is the time to bring the rats to a grinding halt on ALL of their anti-American, socialist BS. Not just no but HELL NO!!
14 posted on 10/19/2010 10:42:21 AM PDT by JPG (Sarah Palin says: "Buck-up or get out of the truck.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DestroyLiberalism
If they recapture the House, Republicans say they are wary of following the example of the class of 1994, which shut down the government in a standoff with President Bill Clinton. Top Republicans contend that passing legislation, or at least making a good faith effort to do so, will earn them more credibility with voters than refusing to waver from purist principles.

The class of 1994 tried to do too much too fast and lost control of the message - that's what was done wrong, rather than what they were trying to accomplish. There is a difference.

15 posted on 10/19/2010 10:42:51 AM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DestroyLiberalism

There was a thread here the other day (maybe several) where everyon climbed all over Obama for sayint that one way or another the GOP would take a new tone and “work with him”.

This prompted Gullible Fools into bomarding the place with electons crying “How crazy! Never! No they won’t!”

And now alredy we have the warm up act....

Anyone who thinks the Republicans “get it” now that they are fearing for their survival is insane.

The only thing they “get” is the tone they have to adopt temporarily.

It’s interesting how many here decry the gullilbility of Arizonans re McCain, then proceed to make a showing of their own.


16 posted on 10/19/2010 10:45:09 AM PDT by Pessimist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat

Please identify these “leaders” prior to the election.


17 posted on 10/19/2010 10:46:19 AM PDT by catman67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

“Well, this is their last chance”

LOL!

No, it isn’t.

The next time they will still be the “lesser of 2 evils”. Adn there will still be plenty here crying “a third party is a sure recipe for defeat!”.

Rinse, and repeat....


18 posted on 10/19/2010 10:46:55 AM PDT by Pessimist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DestroyLiberalism

Can you turn “GOP goes RINO, TPA goes 3rd party” into an effective bumper sticker?


19 posted on 10/19/2010 10:47:03 AM PDT by J Edgar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DestroyLiberalism

Well, there they go again...


20 posted on 10/19/2010 10:48:08 AM PDT by neodad (USS Vincennes (CG 49) "Freedom's Fortress")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson