Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

"In the 30 years after World War II, 1947 to 1977, we taxed ourselves at significantly more progressive tax rates than today. The highest earners paid twice as much of their income in taxes in 1960 as they do today, according to a new study by Wealth for the Common Good.

With that money, we made investments in public infrastructure, affordable homeownership and expanded education at all levels. Far-sighted leaders supported policies that propelled millions of Americans into the stable middle class."

It always amazes me how these fools like Mr. Heegaard always hark back to a time that's impossible to recreate with the USA being the only major manufacturing nation in the world, most womwen not in the workforce, and about 1/2 the standard of living that we have today. But it was good for a wealthy banker like himself.

1 posted on 10/24/2010 4:40:04 PM PDT by Chi-townChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Chi-townChief

what a fruitcake


2 posted on 10/24/2010 4:42:11 PM PDT by yldstrk (My heros have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chi-townChief
... federal tax system that has been tilted in favor of the wealthiest 5 percent for a generation.

Alas, how do they get away with this out and out lie time and time again?

3 posted on 10/24/2010 4:43:10 PM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chi-townChief

I’ve got a better idea. We have so many liberals out there whining and screaming to pay higher taxes, WHY DON’T WE MAKE PAYING THEM VOLUNTARY!? You can send in all you want to the politicians in Washington and they will spend your money for you.


4 posted on 10/24/2010 4:43:41 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Which are you voting for on November 2nd? Freedom and liberty or FREE ice cream?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chi-townChief
I would like to see how much he has contributed to the US Government in excess of his legally required minimum tax bill. If it is not substantially greater than zero then he is just a hypocrite and a bs artist--like Buffet and Gates, who have whole batteries of lawyers and accountants to protect their wealth from the government they love so much.
5 posted on 10/24/2010 4:46:23 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chi-townChief

He’s a “social entrepreneur”...hmmm,sounds like an Acorn employee. Social and Entrepreneur are opposites. One makes money, the other leaches...


7 posted on 10/24/2010 4:48:53 PM PDT by CincyRichieRich (Keep your head up and keep moving forward!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chi-townChief
I have excellent news for Mr. Heegaard.

Sir, if you think you are not paying enough taxes, there is a simple solution that won't hurt anybody. All you hae to do is sit down, pull out your checkbook, and write a check payable to the Treasury of the United States for whatever taxes you think you should be paying. They will cheerfully accept it and cash it.

If you do this simple task, you can assuage your guilty soul and leave the rest of us the f*** alone.

8 posted on 10/24/2010 4:48:53 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty (We conservatives will always lose elections as long as we allow the MSM to choose our candidates.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chi-townChief

Mr. Heegaard may want to set aside a little of his fortune for the purchase of a new “I” key for his keyboard, because the old one’s just about worn out. Pete, buddy, if you want to give more of your money to the government, there’s nothing stopping you from cutting a check. Have at it.


9 posted on 10/24/2010 4:49:31 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chi-townChief

Well, Pete, there is nothing preventing YOU from paying more. You can dig into your pocket and pay however much you wish. You first.


10 posted on 10/24/2010 4:49:36 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chi-townChief

What “Pete” doesn’t mention is that from 1947 to 1977 there were tons of loopholes and deductions that no longer exist today.

Someone should explain to Pete that cutting taxes GROWS the economy, while raising them causes economic stagnation.


11 posted on 10/24/2010 4:55:08 PM PDT by july4thfreedomfoundation (The rallying cry of American patriots.....REMEMBER IN NOVEMBER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chi-townChief

We might indeed have to pay higher taxes to reduce our debt. The problem is paying ever higher taxes to fund ever higher government spending.


12 posted on 10/24/2010 4:55:35 PM PDT by kenavi (What drove BP to drill 5,000 feet down?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chi-townChief

re: “Because of the 2001 and 2003 tax breaks and borrowing to pay for two war we’ve racked up 13 trillion in debt.”

So, we’re in debt, not because the government spends too much - no, it’s because we’re not all paying our fair share and wasting money on the “ficticious” war on terror.


13 posted on 10/24/2010 4:56:11 PM PDT by Nevadan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chi-townChief

“Congress should do the responsible thing and let tax cuts for high earners expire at the end of this year.

These people are economically illiterate.


19 posted on 10/24/2010 6:03:34 PM PDT by piytar (There is evil. There is no such thing as moderate evil. Never forget.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chi-townChief

let tax cuts for high earners expire at the end of this year.

I worked for a high earner for 38 years and recently retired.
Thanks to that high earner, several thousand people and I
were employed for many many years. That high earner paid me a salary, paid for my healthcare, bought my home, bought my cars (many over the years)fed me and paid all of my living expenses. The high earner matched my social security contribution and paid me enough to pay taxes to government and pay the sales taxes on my purchases. Add several thousand others who worked for this high earner who benefited from their careers with this family.

So when I hear that the high earners have to pay their fair share I think it is safe to say that they have not only paid their own various taxes but have also paid for the taxes of all of their employees, thousands of them. This high earner should be encouraged, not punished for producing the wealth they have.


20 posted on 10/24/2010 6:07:29 PM PDT by Joan Kerrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chi-townChief
I've had a lifelong interest in the vital role of social entrepreneurs, the local heroes who take risks to lead innovative nonprofit organizations to solve problems at the local level.

Great, now try a for profit enterprise. Nonprofit usually means that the profits are distributed quarterly to at least the executive staff - thereto no profit at the business level.

For profit enterprises actually reinvest some of their money into the economy.

Nonprofit typically means no profits for the economy, plain and simple.

Sounds noble at face value, but in reality - it's just a group of people that found a way to sucker money from people and not have to make a damn thing of real intrinsic value in return...

24 posted on 10/24/2010 6:51:30 PM PDT by !1776!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chi-townChief

Like, if we get Clinton’s tax rates, we’ll have Clinton’s economy?

Just bring back Newt Gingrich and the GOP contract with America, too

and go back to funding the govt at the Cinton budget level, too

sarc


25 posted on 10/24/2010 8:57:52 PM PDT by silverleaf ("This is not an election on November 2 . This is a restraining order" P.J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chi-townChief
Remember when John Kerry chose to pay the lower Tax Rate on his MA Taxes?

Remember when John Kerry got caught not paying the MA Tax Rate on his Yacht?

Remember that Obama’s friends at Google moved their business off shore to avoid a $60 Billion Dollar Tax Liability?

Then there is Barney Frank and Maxine Waters and Charlie Rangle and on and on and on.

26 posted on 10/24/2010 9:31:33 PM PDT by Kickass Conservative (My Rights are God given, not Obama approved...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Chi-townChief

We have racked up more than $13 trillion in national debt, thanks to borrowing to pay for two wars and a decade of tax cuts.”

You CANNOT “pay” for ‘tax cuts’ - tax cuts reduce revenue ... you rack up debt because you SPENT TOO MUCH.

We spent about $20 TRILLION in the past 8 years.


27 posted on 10/24/2010 10:00:23 PM PDT by WOSG (OPERATION RESTORE AMERICAN FREEDOM - NOVEMBER, 2010 - DO YOUR PART!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson