Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Get Barney (Bawney Fwank tries to stay cool, even when his boyfriend loses it)
National Review ^ | 10/26/2010 | Daniel Foster

Posted on 10/26/2010 7:07:49 AM PDT by WebFocus

Is Barney Frank worried?

“Not to be condescending, but let me give you a little tip,” he tells National Review Online outside a convention hall on Massachusetts’ south coast. “Never ask a candidate if he’s confident he’s going to win: because the answer will always be ‘yes.’”

Indeed, Frank is still the clear favorite in Massachusetts’s 4th congressional district. But even as he speaks, it has come out that he’s lent his campaign two hundred grand from his own pocket, and reporters are nagging him about a bizarre — and for a 30-year incumbent, wildly undisciplined — incident in which his boyfriend, Jim Ready, was caught on camera going paparazzo on Republican challenger Sean Bielat — snapping photos and hurling insults.

And although he won’t say it in so many words, Frank’s campaign has a look and feel of — if not desperation, than at least discomfort. Frank says that his internals have him up between 19 and 20 points but admits that the race has become nationalized, and he’s had to campaign harder than in previous years. He’s even running TV spots — something he last did in his 2004 semi-official campaign to succeed John Kerry had the latter become president — in the effort to fend off the pesky Beilat, a 35-year-old Marine veteran whose list of almae matres reads like the top college rankings from U.S. News and World Report.

And the tone at a Frank campaign rally in Newton later that night can be described as somewhere between manic and panic.

“I know, we think Barney’s tough and can handle himself, but sometimes he needs our help,” Massachusetts state legislator Peter Koutoujian tells a crowd of about a hundred gathered on the second floor of Union Pub & Grille in Newton Centre.

Newton is a town deep inside Fortress Frank, boasting solar-powered trash compactors on the sidewalks and a near six-to-one Democrat-to-Republican ratio. And yet before this friendly crowd, one plied with quesadillas and crudités and cheering loudly, Frank and a stream of local Democratic pols are full of foreboding.

“I think this is the most important off-year election that we’ve ever had,” Frank warns, saying that the “right wing” is “poised to take over the country.” Newton’s mayor says it is “absolutely critical to return Barney to the Congress at this time in our nation’s history.” Several speakers hammer how crucial it will be to turn out 2008 Democratic voters who may be feeling dejected.

And Koutoujian even calls Bielat a “formidable Republican opponent,” and “probably the best” Frank has ever faced.

Frank blames the inordinate attention on his district — a longitudinal, gerrymandered corridor stretches from Massachusetts’ south coast to the university towns west of Boston — to a now familiar source: the “flood of anonymous right-wing money” coming into the race from “outside groups.”

“Once I became chairman of the committee, I became kind of the focus of a lot of the conservative attack,” Frank says, “from Sean Hannity to Rush Limbaugh.”

“The guy running against me has made it clear that he’s not getting support because of him . . . but because people are angry with me. The Tea Party people don’t like me, because, frankly, I wouldn’t be intimidated.”

Frank won’t talk to reporters about his boyfriend’s heckling, calling it “not very important” and questioning why the media is focusing on the “etiquette” of “something as trivial as an argument between two adults” when his constituents are worried about “economics.”

Nor will Bielat use the incident to score easy points, telling NRO only that it “surprised” him that the video of the incident “reached such a large audience.”

“It was a brief interchange,” he says. “What I hope voters are listening to is my message.”

And what is that message? For the most part, Bielat seems to be hewing to the Scott Brown model. He calls himself “pragmatic” rather than conservative, and defends the tea-partiers but won’t label himself a Tea Party candidate. And though he supports traditional marriage and is about as pro-life as you can get away with in the commonwealth, he steers clear of social issues, focusing on government spending and the economy, and tapping into the sense among many here that the Obama-Pelosi-Reid agenda — and Obamacare in particular — are net losers for a state that already has an extensive social safety net. It’s a strategy that worked for Brown, who, keep in mind, fell barely short of carrying Frank’s district.

By contrast, Frank’s message is one of unapologetic liberalism. At that convention center on the south coast, Frank arrives to address a breakfast meeting of local chambers of commerce. He shuffles in, one cufflink undone, and makes his way through a speech on his local and national economic record with his trademark squint-and-mumble, before a crowd that is surprisingly friendly — or at least not hostile — considering the Democrats’ open war on their mother organization. (Frank later tells NRO that, unlike the case of the reform-hating “multinationals” that compose the U.S. Chamber, his relationship with the local branches in his district has always been cordial.)

Deadpan, Frank tells the crowd that Obama “downplayed” the extent of the economic crisis he inherited out of a desire to be “conciliatory” toward Republicans. He downplays the role the GSE policies he engineered played in the financial crisis, even as he admits that he never foresaw Fannie and Freddie’s impending doom. He volunteers that he has been a “consistent opponent” of free-trade agreements and advocates getting “much tougher” with China. He touches on his desire to cut defense spending by as much as $100 billion a year, saying that America’s military presence around the world “does more harm than good” and that “the era of the U.S. being military protector of the entire world . . . is over.” He touts the dubious “Cash for Clunkers” and first-time homebuyer subsidy programs he supported as “tax cuts,” and tells them he believes more “short-term stimulus” is necessary.

And perhaps most remarkable in a political season that is as hostile to pork as any in recent memory, Frank tells these businessmen he is “proud” of his earmarks — rattling off a series of local bridges and interchanges he secured congressional funding for and highlighting the more than half a million dollars he lined up for cranberry research.

Only on taxes does he take what might be construed as a nominally pro-market slant, guaranteeing that an onerous 1099 expensing requirement in Obamacare will be repealed in the lame-duck session — though leaving open the question of “how you offset it” — and suggesting that he would support an “accommodation” on capital-gains rates set to spike at the end of the year.

If Frank is showing voters the goody-bag of federal spending he’s delivered to his district, Bielat is showing them the bill. At a candidates’ forum at the Newtonville Senior Center, Frank drops in to attack Bielat for proposing to raise the retirement age for Social Security then promptly excuses himself, hovering in the back of the room for a few minutes, Styrofoam cup of coffee in hand, to listen to Bielat’s even, measured reply. Forget his years in the Marine Corps, uncommon valor is Bielat telling a room full of Massachusetts seniors that the only solution to inevitable Social Security insolvency is a combination of privatization, means-testing, and a higher retirement age.

The Rochester, N.Y., native, who now lives in Brookline with his wife and son, is clearly comfortable talking straight with voters. This is a state that valorizes elected officials more than others, whether it’s the group of working joes lauding the fact that “Bah-ney’s a 30-year veteran!” as they pose for shots with Frank outside the Union Bar & Grille or the one hostile senior in Newtonville who declares Bielat can’t know what he’s talking about on Social Security because he’s “never worked for the government” (the U.S.M.C., it seems, doesn’t count). And yet, for the most part, they seem receptive to Bielat’s outsider message, frequently applauding his answers to their questions.

When NRO asks if he ever thought the race would be this competitive, Bielat answers without hesitation: “Yes I did, or else I wouldn’t have done it.”

He disputes the methodology of Frank’s polling. His own internals have the race much closer, inside 10, and he expects more good news from third-party polling before the election. When NRO asks him about Frank’s decision to pony up $200K to his own campaign, Bielat smiles and admits “it made my day.”

“It’s a strong indicator of what we already knew. Clearly he’s seeing the same things we are,” he says.

Frank counters that, independent of the reality, the perception that the race is competitive puts him in a catch-22. “I get people saying to me, ‘If you don’t campaign, you’re arrogant, and if you do campaign, you’re desperate.’” He shrugs. “So it’s kind of like asking who do you like better, your mother or your father. There’s no right answer.”

But Bielat is convinced that he’s in it. He says his focus in the last ten days of the race will be “the same thing we’ve been doing since February: volunteers, volunteers, volunteers. Making phone calls. We’ve done 200,000 person-to-person phone calls. We’re identifying our voters and turning them out.”

“We really feel good about our momentum and the direction we’re heading.”

– Daniel Foster is news editor of National Review Online.

TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: barneyfrank; elections; massachusetts; seanbielat

1 posted on 10/26/2010 7:07:54 AM PDT by WebFocus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: WebFocus

The REAl question is “Why aren’t you in JAIL?”

2 posted on 10/26/2010 7:10:51 AM PDT by barbarianbabs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WebFocus

Oh crap....How is Barney going to support his ..............

3 posted on 10/26/2010 7:10:59 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (What)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WebFocus
Barney looks good in orange!

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

4 posted on 10/26/2010 7:14:39 AM PDT by ozark hilljilly (Had enough, yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WebFocus

5 posted on 10/26/2010 7:17:45 AM PDT by laotzu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WebFocus
“Not to be condescending, but let me give you a little tip,”...

Yeah, heard that before, "Just the tip, I swear".

6 posted on 10/26/2010 7:20:19 AM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WebFocus
2ND 3
7 posted on 10/26/2010 7:20:41 AM PDT by baddog 219
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WebFocus
The Tea Party people don’t like me, because, frankly, I wouldn’t be intimidated

Frank is such a whore - he'd sell his mother if it got him his dream boyfriend. I have to say this - next Tuesday, Barney Frank is going down!

.....and maybe for the last time....

8 posted on 10/26/2010 7:21:09 AM PDT by Rummyfan (Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WebFocus

barneys theme song by Little Anthony & The Imperials?
Just two kinds of people in the world they are a boy & boy(girl)

9 posted on 10/26/2010 7:21:14 AM PDT by certrtwngnut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WebFocus
Frank says that his internals have him up between 19 and 20 points but admits that the race has become nationalized, and he’s had to campaign harder than in previous years.

I find it really odd that in such a high-profile "nationalized" campaign like this, that there are apparently no credible external polls being done in this race. All we have to go on is Barney's "internal" polls and a lame Globe poll that has Frank up by 13 (but qualified the poll by saying "enthusiasm is breaking GOP's way"). Where are the major pollsters in this race?

Anyway, Sean Bielat is definitely running a strong and admirable campaign and I think it is much closer than the local media is telling us. Why else would Barney loan his campaign $200K out of his retirement funds?

No matter how massive the GOP victory is next Tuesday on a national basis, I'll be bummed out if the coattails of that victory don't penetrate into Massachusetts and knock some of these embarrassments out of public office. I can't fathom anybody, even a liberal, wanting to vote for Barney Frank. He's a pervert and a very nasty, unlikeable despicable man. And yes, like some have posted earlier, he belongs in jail.

10 posted on 10/26/2010 7:24:48 AM PDT by SamAdams76 (I am 35 days away from outliving Curly Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76

I really find it hard to fathom how he could be up 19 points in these days of anti-government sentiment. Even in Mass.

That seems a tad bit optimistic.

11 posted on 10/26/2010 7:41:33 AM PDT by Vermont Lt (We are so screwed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: WebFocus

If Bielat’s internals say within 10, and Barney is self-financing, this thing could be winnable. Does anyone know if Barney is under 50%?

12 posted on 10/26/2010 8:00:04 AM PDT by manic4organic (Obama shot hoops, America lost troops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: barbarianbabs

I can’t wait to see this little faggot out of the Congress and in jail where he belongs.

13 posted on 10/26/2010 8:13:42 AM PDT by thethirddegree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: manic4organic

RE: Does anyone know if Barney is under 50%?

Yesterday’s Boston Globe Poll had Bawney at just 46%.

14 posted on 10/26/2010 9:53:18 AM PDT by WebFocus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: WebFocus

Very good news. Thank you!

15 posted on 10/26/2010 11:11:45 AM PDT by manic4organic (Obama shot hoops, America lost troops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson