Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Arizona's Jeffrey Landrigan executed despite concerns drugs not FDA-approved _
NY Daily news ^ | 10/27/2010 | Aliyah Shahid

Posted on 10/27/2010 10:10:10 AM PDT by managusta

The state of Arizona executed a convicted murderer on Tuesday night despite objections from attorneys that the state would use a non-approved drug from overseas for the lethal injection.

Just hours before Jeffrey Landrigan's death, the Supreme Court voted 5-4 to lift a stay issued by a federal judge to halt the execution.

"There is no evidence in the record to suggest that the drug obtained from a foreign source is unsafe," the Supreme Court said

Due to a U.S. shortage, the state turned to a non-FDA approved drug. It was later revealed that the source was the U.K., although the actual company that makes the drug is still unknown.

Experts argue the practice raises concerns about the effectiveness of the drug. It may also cause difficulties for executions in the 35 states that allow them, as those on death row challenge the use of drugs not approved by the feds.

"The impact could be huge," Deborah Denno, a law professor at Fordham University said.

(Excerpt) Read more at nydailynews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: arizona; attorneys; company; convict; death; deathpenalty; deathrow; drug; drugs; execution; fda; judge; lethalinjection; murderer; professor; supremecourt; uk; unsafe
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last
To: sunmars
just put them a soundproof room with nothing but Obama speeches on repeat

With Yoko Ono screech-singing in the background.

41 posted on 10/27/2010 10:51:24 AM PDT by ScottinVA (The West needs to act NOW to aggressively treat its metastasizing islaminoma!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
"It is a great reason for the creation of a “Second Court of the United States”, "
NO, we do not need any more courts...what we need a house of representative that are willing to do their jobs...the house has oversight of the judiciary, and bring up articles of impeachement and impeach any federal judge they damn well please...my question is, why has this not been done? because the republicans and democrats both want a rogue judiciary, so that communism can be spread by fiat....if the tea party candidates do not impeach judges this term ( and there are many that have blatantly violated their oath of office ) then I will drop out and vote third party....be ready my friends, be ready
42 posted on 10/27/2010 10:55:59 AM PDT by joe fonebone (They will get my Fishing Rod when they pry it from my cold dead fingers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: thackney

The execution is a three step process:

Sodium thiopental: ultra-short action barbiturate, an anaesthetic agent capable of rendering the prisoner unconscious in a few seconds.

Pancuronium: non-depolarizing muscle relaxant, causes complete, fast and sustained paralysis of the skeletal striated muscles, including the diaphragm and the rest of the respiratory muscles; this would eventually cause death by asphyxiation.

Potassium chloride: stops the heart, and thus causes death by cardiac arrest.

The drug in question is Sodium thiopental, a prescription barbituate, which is used to render the prisoner unconscious before the injection of the (more) fatal drugs. The dose of Sodium thiopental used in executions is several times the theraputic dosage, so the prisoner is certifiably, undeniably, reliably dead. They couldn’t get any from the only U.S. manufacturer, to they went on line and got some from the UK.


43 posted on 10/27/2010 10:56:59 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (If not Boston, then Texas. Go Rangers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets

I was trying to make the point there was no reason to require FDA approval even if the drug is considered unsafe at lower dosages.


44 posted on 10/27/2010 11:02:26 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat

There is an Army Field Manual on executions. In making a scaffold, selecting a rope and tying a noose, you have to considered the weight of the condemned convict. Too much of a drop and you may pull his head off (messy), too little, he will be slowly affixiated rather than dying quickly of a broken neck. The coughing and sputtering can be uncomfortable for the executioners and the witnesses. An exceptionally heavy convict may require a stronger rope and beam. Leave nothing to chance.


45 posted on 10/27/2010 11:07:25 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (If not Boston, then Texas. Go Rangers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: centurion316
Kagan , in her first vote on supreme court, voted against execution because of safety concerns with the drug - on Drudge.
46 posted on 10/27/2010 11:08:38 AM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: thackney

There is a legitimate concern that it might be ineffective and the convict would be conscious when the lethal components are applied. Nothing that will keep me awake at nights, though.


47 posted on 10/27/2010 11:09:28 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (If not Boston, then Texas. Go Rangers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: managusta
"The impact could be huge," Deborah Denno, a law professor at Fordham University said.

Why, it could kill them!!!! Someone think of the CHILDREN!!!!

48 posted on 10/27/2010 11:22:56 AM PDT by JRios1968 (What is the difference between 0bama and his dog, Bo? Bo has papers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Maybe they meant the criminal would be safely dead but then this is the legal system speaking.


49 posted on 10/27/2010 11:24:06 AM PDT by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: managusta

Let him file an appeal from hell !


50 posted on 10/27/2010 11:32:16 AM PDT by lionheart 247365 (-:{ GLENN BECK is 0bama's TRANSPARENCY CZAR }:-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DPMD
The morbidly obese Michael Moore...

How did Moore get that fat if he eshews McDonalds and similar fast food fare? Patedefauxgras, lobster in drawn butter, fried truffles, jugs of heavy egg nog?

51 posted on 10/27/2010 11:50:27 AM PDT by luvbach1 (Stop Barry now. He can't help himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: managusta

You miss the point. The point is to add hours to the lawyers bill to the state.

Beating a dead horse even to the point it is but a pink pulp means billable hours. It is more or less free money


52 posted on 10/27/2010 11:57:43 AM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... Greetings Jacques. The revolution is coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: managusta

The comments in that article are simply bizarre!


53 posted on 10/27/2010 12:52:31 PM PDT by RobinOfKingston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: managusta

Would a physician, veterinarian, or other health professional explain to me why they cannot use the overdose of an anesthetic that is used to put pets “to sleep.” I have seen this used twice on my old, very sick dogs and it provided a quick, apparently painless death, maybe five seconds between injection and death.


54 posted on 10/27/2010 1:11:04 PM PDT by OldPossum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: managusta

Common sense has long fled the world of PC. How can anyone take these frickin’ idiots seriously? Why didn’t someone in authority simply break out laughing and demand that these people be locked up for their own safety and for that of others.


55 posted on 10/27/2010 1:46:05 PM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson