1 posted on
10/29/2010 6:44:47 AM PDT by
Ebenezer
To: lsucat; Roux; Pikachu_Dad; WFTR; chemicalman; abb; Liberty911; CajunConservative; LSUfan; ...
2 posted on
10/29/2010 6:45:31 AM PDT by
Ebenezer
(Strength and Honor!)
To: rrstar96
...
panelists pressed the senator on whether he broke the law when he committed a "serious sin" involving a Washington, D.C., prostitution ring. Obviously, living in California, I did not see the debate.
Was Elliot Spitzer one of the panelists?
3 posted on
10/29/2010 6:48:03 AM PDT by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
To: rrstar96
So, according to the TP (heh, heh. TP. What a coincidence)....ahem....getting back to my question....according to the TP, which part was the "nasty" and "personal" part?
Was it where Vitter called those who insist on picking at scabs "political hacks"?
4 posted on
10/29/2010 6:51:42 AM PDT by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
To: rrstar96
Louisiana FReepers, I already voted Dardenne, Vitter and Cassidy!!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson