Skip to comments.
The Question Everyone is Asking:
Who gets the first subpoena?
American Thinker ^
| 11/3/10
| Ed Lasky
Posted on 11/03/2010 9:14:35 AM PDT by Nachum
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-29 last
To: Nachum
Ah. An easy one. That would be our Attorney General: Eric the Red That was my first thought as well.
And I'd add whoever the Hawaii official is that has stonewalled access to the (incriminating) long form BC.
And how about immunity for Blago if he'll drop dime on the Rezko/Obama/Emmanuel corruption ring?
Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.
21
posted on
11/03/2010 10:14:49 AM PDT
by
The Comedian
(I really missed you. Next time, I'll adjust for windage.)
To: Nachum
I hope nobody. Being obsessed with the past is how the gains of 94 got squandered. It’s time to govern the future not prosecute the past, hearing never accomplish anything. The first thing they should do is pass a federal budget in the House, making a big show of how it’s 6 months over due and we all know the still Dem controlled Senate will ignore it completely. Setup for 2012.
22
posted on
11/03/2010 10:18:33 AM PDT
by
discostu
(Keyser Soze lives)
To: Nachum
Actually, I need to add another:
George Soros.
Full subpoena of all financial records and communications with anyone associated with the White House.
Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.
23
posted on
11/03/2010 10:22:05 AM PDT
by
The Comedian
(I really missed you. Next time, I'll adjust for windage.)
To: Nachum
Eric, my advice to you... make sure your lawyer reads things (unlike you when it came to the AZ anti-illegal immigration law... where you commented/shot it down before knowing what was in the law).
You better bring a tent and sleeping bag and provisions to your hearings because you're going to be there for quite a while starting January.
24
posted on
11/03/2010 10:28:26 AM PDT
by
Trajan88
(www.bullittclub.com)
To: Nachum
Will there even be a first subpoena or is this more hot air?
25
posted on
11/03/2010 10:43:26 AM PDT
by
freekitty
(Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
To: discostu
"I hope nobody. Being obsessed with the past is how the gains of 94 got squandered."
I agree. It's also how the Dems squandered their 2006 and 2008 gains. They wanted to revisit, over and over, every real or imagined scandal of the Bush administration, and the public got sick of it.
26
posted on
11/03/2010 10:45:51 AM PDT
by
Steve_Seattle
("Above all, shake your bum at Burton.")
To: bigbob
Add Harry Reid to that list.
How can a candidate go from 2-4 points ahead to 13 points behind?
To: Steve_Seattle
Yeah, the public can barely tolerate the politics of revenge when things are going well. When the economy is in the toilet... well we see the results. The best thing a GOP House facing a Dem Senate and Pres can do is make a lot of noise passing lots of laws, watch them die in the Senate and get vetoed and be in a position in 2012 to say “we tried but they wouldn’t let us”. Try to shrink government, and the budget, and taxes, pass them over an over, own the agenda, own the noise, put the Dems in the position of being the “party of no”.
28
posted on
11/03/2010 10:58:30 AM PDT
by
discostu
(Keyser Soze lives)
To: Nachum
I can only pray that the first subpoena goes to a judge from the 9th circus, and that the judge is impeached...
29
posted on
11/03/2010 11:47:04 AM PDT
by
joe fonebone
(The House has oversight of the Judiciary...why are the rogue judges not being impeached?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-29 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson