|
This account has been banned or suspended. Okay |
 Aww Gee.... Poor Widdle Twoll Him Got Banned |
Click the Pic
DADT didn’t ban gays. The DADT undid the ban on gays.
The Constitution is the issue at hand. This judge, Gates, Obama, and yes, this congress is complicit in the furthering of the gay agenda.
I am not.
I will repeat myself one more time for your benefit. The Constitution is the issue - not because gays can or can’t, should or shouldn’t serve. The Constitution is the issue because the Rule of Law is the issue.
I have no desire to further the gay agenda. I abhor the gay agenda.
But your refusal to see that the Constitution as taking primacy over your personal agenda is something I find personally disgusting.
I have said Gates is wrong. I have said the Judge is wrong. I have made it clear I oppose the homosexual agenda. What you seem to be missing is this is a Federal Judge using the fact that the homosexual agenda exists as the means to exert undue influence over the military in direct contradiction to the Constitution.
If you really want to win this argument you have to decide whether or not you side with the Constitution or not. You have to decide whether you agree to the Dem’s premise of special treatment for special groups - the premise that there are special groups. You have to decide whether or not you support rule of law or your own personal agenda.
Where do you want to stand?
Your position puts you in the cross-fire between the bigots on both sides.
You want to prevent the demoralization of our military, then you understand that the DOD needn’t dignify this by doing anything other than telling that judge to go read the Constitution and STFU. There was no jurisdiction there. You want to do more? Motivate those in Congress who actually do have the jurisdiction to fight for the side of what’s right.
Or you can continue to cast misplaced aspersions at me.
Your choice, bucko.
I am not.
Then why did you say "WHO CARES"?
I will repeat myself one more time for your benefit. The Constitution is the issue - not because gays can or can’t, should or shouldn’t serve. The Constitution is the issue because the Rule of Law is the issue.
The issue on THIS THREAD is Gates trying to allow homosexuals in the military.
But your refusal to see that the Constitution as taking primacy over your personal agenda is something I find personally disgusting.
Which is something that I have NEVER done. Moreover, my opposition to militant homosexualism IS NOT a "personal agenda," it is an integral part of conservatism.
I have said Gates is wrong. I have said the Judge is wrong. I have made it clear I oppose the homosexual agenda. What you seem to be missing is this is a Federal Judge using the fact that the homosexual agenda exists as the means to exert undue influence over the military in direct contradiction to the Constitution.
Yet you have applauded what Gates is doing.
Implying that the Constitution is secondary to the Creator. I think this is where this 'conflict' on the topic is premised...
Yes, the Constitution is being trampled upon by the leftist judges and politicians intent on limiting individual liberty and accumulating power...
HOWEVER, the Constitution is premised upon the Creator -specifically, what all individuals are endowed from Him.
One can not truly uphold and argue the merits of upholding the Constitution while at the same time dismissing its very premise as irrelevant, a secondary concern, or a bigoted position...
|
This account has been banned or suspended. Okay |
| Aww Gee.... Poor Widdle Twoll Him Got Banned |