Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WAW; metmom; trisham; BykrBayb; xzins; P-Marlowe; wmfights; DJ MacWoW; little jeremiah; ...
I’ve been here a long time and will be here a lot longer...

You've been here since September 17th, thats seven and a half weeks which is hardly a long time.

So, what are your other names? I presume that your statement about being he a lot longer means that you plan to continue to rejoin.

If you don’t see how undermining the authority of the military to conduct its affairs by the judiciary not only weakens our military but also and I daresay more importantly undermines the Constitution and the Rule of Law, then I daresay you have forgotten what you are fighting for.

The issue on this thread is the FACT that Gates wants to allow homosexuals in the military. All of your posts about the courts are fine, but it still has nothing to do with the FACT that Zero and Gates both want homosexuals serving openly in the military.

Either that or you are very easily confused.

You seem to have perfected the trollish habit of personally attacking anyone who stands up for conservative principles.

154 posted on 11/08/2010 11:25:12 AM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies ]


To: wagglebee

I have not had another name. I have been lurking for several years now.

You seem to think gays just started joining the military yesterday.

Gays exist. Gays serve.

We lost on the DADT argument 20 years ago. This is the world we live in now.

So seriously, what is the best way to reverse this as soon as possible?

I contend it’s to smack that Federal Judge across the face with the Constitution and have her disbarred.

I also contend its in conservatives motivating their Congressmen elected representatives to act - since they have obviously abnegated their duties. We have recently shown we can hold them responsible. This is just one issue among many that contend for their attention. We need to make the best arguments possible and you can’t assume that your representative already agrees with you. You have to make that one best argument.

When you understand conservatism well enough to give me lectures on it, I’ll be the first one in line, I promise.

Rule of Law goes much further back than your temper tantrums.


156 posted on 11/08/2010 11:42:31 AM PST by WAW (Which enumerated power?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson