So would all of what he has signed into law be considered null and void/ wishing????
Bristol Palin here...
http://www.examiner.com/celebrity-headlines-in-national/bristol-palin-dancing-with-the-stars-week-8-argentine-tango-video-video
Wow! What a shocker! Can we citizens get at reprieve?
Is this just on the horizon? ->
“Obama In Deep Trouble, Huge Scandals Brewing”
http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2010/10/30/obama-in-deep-trouble-huge-scandals-brewing/
DT2 = Deep Throat 2
We shall see.
I think I’ve seen this one before: “No controlling legal authority”
And THIS is the reason Pelosi stays in...in case 0bama is relieved during the Lame Duck.
And not one SOB in the Congress has the intestinal fortitude to ask or insist that it be shown.
But of course now it is too late.
Exactly not.
Produce the proof Obama Fraud.
Show me the money!
The only thing scarier than having an inelligible president obama is the thought of president biden. Now that is a very scary thought.
The Twentieth Amendment, Section 3 reads as follows:
”3. If, at the time fixed for the beginning of the term of the President, the President elect shall have died, the Vice President elect shall become President. If a President shall not have been chosen before the time fixed for the beginning of his term, or if the President elect shall have failed to qualify, then the Vice President elect shall act as President until a President shall have qualified; and the Congress may by law provide for the case wherein neither a President elect nor a Vice President elect shall have qualified, declaring who shall then act as President, or the manner in which one who is to act shall be selected, and such person shall act accordingly until a President or Vice President shall have qualified.”
Exhibit B U. S. Code, CITE: 3USC19
TITLE 3--THE PRESIDENT, CHAPTER 1- PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS AND VACANCIES
Sec. 19. Vacancy in offices of both President and Vice President; officers eligible to act
”(a)(1) If, by reason of death, resignation, removal from office, inability, or failure to qualify, there is neither a President nor Vice President to discharge the powers and duties of the office of President, then the Speaker of the House of Representatives shall, upon his resignation as Speaker and as Representative in Congress, act as President. “
Exhibit C: U. S. Constitution, Article Six Oath of Office for elected officials:
” The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.”
The portion in bold stating “or if the President elect shall have failed to qualify” in section three is particularly interesting in that it plainly seems to infer that a “qualification” of some sort must be made in order to serve as President. Certainly, one cannot argue that it does not require a qualification process for one to “qualify”. To infer that the lack of a “specified” qualification process means that stated eligibility “qualifications” for the office of president can be ignored is fallacious. The wording of this passage in the twentieth amendment clearly infers that a qualification is required, regardless of how this is done.
There is only one set of qualifications listed anywhere in the Constitution that are not health related and they are listed in Article two, section one.
” No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”
To satisfy meeting the requirement of the twentieth amendment to “qualify”, a president elect must present evidence that he meets it’s requirements for eligibility to serve. This means that a proper birth certificate HAD to be presented by the president elect in order to serve as president. In fact, without establishing whether or not the President elect is "qualified", Congress would not know whether or not to step in and name a temporary replacement as the Amendment requires. Certainly, this means that the proof of "qualifications" must be presented to Congress.
If this was done, where is that certificate and to whom was it presented? If this was done, why would we not have the right to verify and inspect it under the freedom of information act?
If it was NOT done, then under the provisions of the twentieth amendment, Barrack Obama has “failed to qualify” and should not be serving as president of the United States of America.
Based upon the above, I conclude that:
1. We currently have a vacancy at President because no one has yet “qualified” as required in the Twentieth amendment. The terms "The President elect shall have failed to qualify" clearly places this burden upon the President elect and not on someone raising their hand in objection.
2. Anyone serving in Congress (see “Congress” in bold in Exhibit A), or anyone who is currently serving under the oath of office in Article six has "standing" and can DEMAND that their oaths be met by receiving proper “qualifying” documentation from Mr. Obama. This charade at the time of counting the Electoral College votes does not limit their ability to do so at any time they so choose. The very fact that they are duty-bound by oath to "support" the Constitution REQUIRES them to respond to any and all attacks against it. No judge can deny any of them the standing to do so. It would ask them to break the law in their effort to enforce the law.
3. We need to start pressing legal charges against all of our local representatives and senators covered by the oath of office in Article six for disobeying their oaths to support the Constitution as it pertains to the language of section three of the Twentieth amendment. Put PRESSURE on them to represent the document that gives them their authority in the first place. We are looking into how best to do this down here. We all should be looking into this approach. NOW.
In Kerchner v. Obama/Congress/Pelosi Petition for Writ of Certiorari before the Supreme Court, Mario Apuzio also included a claim for “equal protection under the law”, whereas the Congress investigated John McCain’s elegibility but not Obama’s. This may demonstrate some forsightedness on Apuzzo’s part.
http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2010/11/kerchner-v-obamacongresspelosi-update_08.html
Funny that they never thought to question Obama’s natural born status when they were checking out mccains. remember when they were questioning this because he was born outside the US on a military base?
Well duh. That's why we need a specific law that requires it in detail. The Founders just assumed that voters would enforce this when voting. How about some states start passing laws on this?
In any case getting Obama out once elected requires impeachment so all those court cases were doomed to fail, and Republicans know better than to go near impeachment as they want to win 2012. And more bad news : Impeaching Obama does NOT invalidate the past two years laws. There is no Butterfly Effect that makes the past two years go away.
“....no one – not Congress, not the states and not election officials – bothered to check Barack Obama’s eligibility to be president, and in fact, that status remains undocumented to this day.”
.
So what will happen now? Will we continue to ignore the issue for the sake of preventing riots in the streets? Does this mean that our next prez could be an Afghan?
the doc is there. right-click and download each of 14 pages, if you wish.
We couldnt pay one guy to make sure we didnt hire a Kenyan born muslim to our nations highest office?
*oops*
Bunk from 2009.