Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CAIR Travel Advisory: New Airport Pat-Downs Called Invasive, Humiliating
CAIR website ^ | 11/10/2010 | CAIR release

Posted on 11/11/2010 5:13:21 PM PST by NYpeanut

(WASHINGTON, D.C., 11/10/2010) -- CAIR [Council on American-Islamic Relations]today issued a travel advisory for airline passengers who may be subjected to new Transportation Security Administration (TSA) "enhanced pat-downs" that many of those who undergo the procedure describe as invasive and humiliating.

The advisory comes after two of the nation's largest pilots' unions urged commercial pilots to avoid both full-body scanners and public pat-downs. Pilots have compared the new pat-downs to "sexual molestation." A union for flight attendants has expressed similar concerns.

Travelers are being asked to educate themselves about the new policy and to know their rights if asked to undergo security pat-downs. CAIR's advisory is particularly important for Muslim travelers leaving for or returning from Hajj because of concerns that they will be singled out for secondary screening by security personnel.

CAIR offices have already received complaints, particularly from female travelers who wear hijab, about being subjected to the new pat-down procedure.

The enhanced pat-down involves a much more intrusive manual search of passengers' bodies by TSA officers. Passengers who have undergone the new pat-down procedure have reported feeling humiliated by a search they describe as invasive and that has involved TSA officers touching the face and hair, the groin area and buttocks, and in between and underneath breasts.

One traveler wearing hijab, a 56-year-old Muslim flying out of Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport, told CAIR the TSA screener patted-down her entire upper body, including, head, neck, chest, and hips, with the backs of her hands. The Muslim woman said she had "no idea" how invasive the procedure would be and would otherwise have opted for a private room or demanded to know why she was selected for secondary screening.

[NOTE: The woman had been referred to secondary screening even though the metal detector did not go off, a phenomenon reported frequently to CAIR by female Muslim travelers.]

BACKGROUND: Beginning earlier this year, the TSA began using full-imaging scanners in airports. In February, CAIR supported a statement by a prominent group of Muslim scholars that the full-body scanners violate religious and privacy rights.

As of August 2010, passengers who opted out of the full-body scanners were subject to the enhanced pat-down.

In light of the growing concerns about the invasiveness of the new enhanced pat-down procedure, CAIR offers the following recommendations to Muslim travelers:


* If you opt out of the full-image body scanner, you have the right to request that the manual search be conducted in private.
* It is your right to be screened by an officer of the same gender. The TSA states in its Head-to-Toe Screening Policies: "It is TSA's policy that passengers should be screened by an officer of the same gender in a professional, respectful manner."
* If you experience any disturbing incidents with the new pat down procedure, particularly if you feel you have been subjected to religious or racial profiling, harassment or unfair treatment, immediately file a complaint with the TSA and report the incident to your local CAIR chapter.

Special recommendations for Muslim women who wear hijab:

* If you are selected for secondary screening after you go through the metal detector and it does not go off, and "sss" is not written on your boarding pass, ask the TSA officer if the reason you are being selected is because of your head scarf.
* In this situation, you may be asked to submit to a pat-down or to go through a full body scanner. If you are selected for the scanner, you may ask to go through a pat-down instead.
* Before you are patted down, you should remind the TSA officer that they are only supposed to pat down the area in question, in this scenario, your head and neck. They SHOULD NOT subject you to a full-body or partial-body pat-down.
* You may ask to be taken to a private room for the pat-down procedure.
* Instead of the pat-down, you can always request to pat down your own scarf, including head and neck area, and have the officers perform a chemical swipe of your hands.
* If you encounter any issues, ask to speak to a supervisor immediately. They are there to assist you.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cair; cairishamas; muslim
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
And all this enhanced security that CAIR finds "invasive and humiliating" is because...
1 posted on 11/11/2010 5:13:24 PM PST by NYpeanut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NYpeanut
Well, it is invasive and humiliating. This is probably the first time I've ever agreed with CAIR. I hope it's the last time.
2 posted on 11/11/2010 5:16:41 PM PST by JoeFromSidney ( New book, RESISTANCE TO TYRANNY. More @ www.book-resistancetotyranny.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYpeanut

I think it is humiliating to everyone- whether by groping or radiation strip search - not to mention additional radiation. I’m with the pilots on this one.


3 posted on 11/11/2010 5:17:27 PM PST by aMorePerfectUnion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYpeanut

I’ll say it! ...because the “F”ing radical MUZZIES caused it. Deal with it!


4 posted on 11/11/2010 5:17:55 PM PST by WellyP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: NYpeanut

Well CAIR, tell your pals to stop blowing shit up and then maybe the pat downs would not be needed.


6 posted on 11/11/2010 5:20:37 PM PST by deadrock (Liberty is a bitch that needs to be bedded on a mattress of cadavers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeFromSidney

I haven’t seen anyone mention the hygiene factor. The TSA agents wear gloves, but they don’t change their gloves from one person to another. I don’t particularly care for someone putting their gloved hand on my crotch when there’s no tellin’ where that hand has been. I don’t care if people are clothed—non-hygienic body fluids can soak through clothing.


7 posted on 11/11/2010 5:21:35 PM PST by DallasDeb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle
If CAIR doesn’t like it, it’s usually a good thing.

Yo CAIR... your whining hypocritical WHACKO Co-Conspirators CAUSED all this... you ragheads stop flying, and we won't even need this security BS. Actually, CONCEALED CARRY would put an end to it...too!!!

8 posted on 11/11/2010 5:22:29 PM PST by gwilhelm56 (NAACP ... Your RACE CARD has been declined.. it's Over the LIMIT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NYpeanut

Hey CAIR, right back at cha. You started it. We’re gonna finish it.


9 posted on 11/11/2010 5:22:29 PM PST by upchuck (When excerpting please use the entire 300 words we are allowed. No more one or two sentence posts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYpeanut
Hussein Obama will sit up and take notice now that his ilk has registered a complaint.

Look for a ‘Change in the Procedure’ any day now.

10 posted on 11/11/2010 5:23:43 PM PST by Realman30 (Naomi Campbell is rougher with her assistants than we are with Taliban fighters: Ann C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeFromSidney

You know what will probably happen? The idiots in Washington will probably allow Muslims to opt out with out consequence. And so, what we will have then is a political correctness that won’t allow for racial profiling to attempt to catch Muslim terrorists, which results in invasive and abusive searches of EVERYONE, except for Muslims (who will be exempt from the searches).


11 posted on 11/11/2010 5:23:43 PM PST by comps4spice (Ding Dong the Witch (Pelosi) is dead! Olbermann too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NYpeanut

Well, I’m sure that now that CAIR finds it offensive anything that identifies itself as a mudslime will be exempt from screening.

NEXT!


12 posted on 11/11/2010 5:24:26 PM PST by 43north (BHO: 50% white, 50% black, 100% red)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYpeanut

Haa haa haa. Next thing you know they’ll be exempt while the rest of us get the shaft. TSA already says turban wearers can pat down their own turbans.


13 posted on 11/11/2010 5:26:23 PM PST by ViLaLuz (2 Chronicles 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: comps4spice

Yeah, that’s just about where I see it going.


14 posted on 11/11/2010 5:26:32 PM PST by NYpeanut (I can't look away)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: comps4spice
You know what will probably happen? The idiots in Washington will probably allow Muslims to opt out with out consequence. And so, what we will have then is a political correctness that won’t allow for racial profiling to attempt to catch Muslim terrorists, which results in invasive and abusive searches of EVERYONE, except for Muslims (who will be exempt from the searches).

=================

In their fantasy world this would be objective and fair. After all, we don't won't to do anything to offend or cast the members of The Religion of Peace in a negative light.

15 posted on 11/11/2010 5:29:46 PM PST by Realman30 (Naomi Campbell is rougher with her assistants than we are with Taliban fighters: Ann C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: NYpeanut

“Instead of the pat-down, you can always request to pat down your own scarf, including head and neck area, and have the officers perform a chemical swipe of your hands.”

Is this option available to ALL?


16 posted on 11/11/2010 5:32:37 PM PST by ViLaLuz (2 Chronicles 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYpeanut

...’’is because’’ of the F’ing Muslims THAT”S WHY!!! Thank you “Religion’ o’ Peace’’ thank you so f’ing much you 7th. century barbarians, thank you so bloody much!!


17 posted on 11/11/2010 5:44:53 PM PST by jmacusa (Two wrongs don't make a right. But they can make it interesting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYpeanut

Maybe we should exempt Muslims on religious and cultural grounds.


18 posted on 11/11/2010 5:46:53 PM PST by November 2010
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeFromSidney

if one chooses to dress like a terrorist ,then they should not be upset when treated like one!


19 posted on 11/11/2010 6:37:19 PM PST by omegadawn (qualified)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NYpeanut
And all this enhanced security that CAIR finds "invasive and humiliating" is because...

PC which is in overdrive already with the TSA types will go into ultra-sesitive mode. Only well dressed, clean cut, obviously not a threat type Caucasians will be groped if they opt out. Especially airline crew members.

20 posted on 11/11/2010 6:48:57 PM PST by BluH2o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson