Skip to comments.
CAIR Travel Advisory: New Airport Pat-Downs Called Invasive, Humiliating
CAIR website ^
| 11/10/2010
| CAIR release
Posted on 11/11/2010 5:13:21 PM PST by NYpeanut
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
And all this enhanced security that CAIR finds "invasive and humiliating" is because...
1
posted on
11/11/2010 5:13:24 PM PST
by
NYpeanut
To: NYpeanut
Well, it is invasive and humiliating. This is probably the first time I've ever agreed with CAIR. I hope it's the last time.
2
posted on
11/11/2010 5:16:41 PM PST
by
JoeFromSidney
( New book, RESISTANCE TO TYRANNY. More @ www.book-resistancetotyranny.com)
To: NYpeanut
I think it is humiliating to everyone- whether by groping or radiation strip search - not to mention additional radiation. I’m with the pilots on this one.
To: NYpeanut
I’ll say it! ...because the “F”ing radical MUZZIES caused it. Deal with it!
4
posted on
11/11/2010 5:17:55 PM PST
by
WellyP
Comment #5 Removed by Moderator
To: NYpeanut
Well CAIR, tell your pals to stop blowing shit up and then maybe the pat downs would not be needed.
6
posted on
11/11/2010 5:20:37 PM PST
by
deadrock
(Liberty is a bitch that needs to be bedded on a mattress of cadavers.)
To: JoeFromSidney
I haven’t seen anyone mention the hygiene factor. The TSA agents wear gloves, but they don’t change their gloves from one person to another. I don’t particularly care for someone putting their gloved hand on my crotch when there’s no tellin’ where that hand has been. I don’t care if people are clothed—non-hygienic body fluids can soak through clothing.
7
posted on
11/11/2010 5:21:35 PM PST
by
DallasDeb
To: F15Eagle
If CAIR doesnt like it, its usually a good thing.
Yo CAIR... your whining hypocritical WHACKO Co-Conspirators CAUSED all this... you ragheads stop flying, and we won't even need this security BS. Actually, CONCEALED CARRY would put an end to it...too!!!
8
posted on
11/11/2010 5:22:29 PM PST
by
gwilhelm56
(NAACP ... Your RACE CARD has been declined.. it's Over the LIMIT!)
To: NYpeanut
Hey CAIR, right back at cha. You started it. We’re gonna finish it.
9
posted on
11/11/2010 5:22:29 PM PST
by
upchuck
(When excerpting please use the entire 300 words we are allowed. No more one or two sentence posts!)
To: NYpeanut
Hussein Obama will sit up and take notice now that his ilk has registered a complaint.
Look for a ‘Change in the Procedure’ any day now.
10
posted on
11/11/2010 5:23:43 PM PST
by
Realman30
(Naomi Campbell is rougher with her assistants than we are with Taliban fighters: Ann C.)
To: JoeFromSidney
You know what will probably happen? The idiots in Washington will probably allow Muslims to opt out with out consequence. And so, what we will have then is a political correctness that won’t allow for racial profiling to attempt to catch Muslim terrorists, which results in invasive and abusive searches of EVERYONE, except for Muslims (who will be exempt from the searches).
11
posted on
11/11/2010 5:23:43 PM PST
by
comps4spice
(Ding Dong the Witch (Pelosi) is dead! Olbermann too!)
To: NYpeanut
Well, I’m sure that now that CAIR finds it offensive anything that identifies itself as a mudslime will be exempt from screening.
NEXT!
12
posted on
11/11/2010 5:24:26 PM PST
by
43north
(BHO: 50% white, 50% black, 100% red)
To: NYpeanut
Haa haa haa. Next thing you know they’ll be exempt while the rest of us get the shaft. TSA already says turban wearers can pat down their own turbans.
13
posted on
11/11/2010 5:26:23 PM PST
by
ViLaLuz
(2 Chronicles 7:14)
To: comps4spice
Yeah, that’s just about where I see it going.
14
posted on
11/11/2010 5:26:32 PM PST
by
NYpeanut
(I can't look away)
To: comps4spice
You know what will probably happen? The idiots in Washington will probably allow Muslims to opt out with out consequence. And so, what we will have then is a political correctness that wont allow for racial profiling to attempt to catch Muslim terrorists, which results in invasive and abusive searches of EVERYONE, except for Muslims (who will be exempt from the searches).
=================
In their fantasy world this would be objective and fair. After all, we don't won't to do anything to offend or cast the members of The Religion of Peace in a negative light.
15
posted on
11/11/2010 5:29:46 PM PST
by
Realman30
(Naomi Campbell is rougher with her assistants than we are with Taliban fighters: Ann C.)
To: NYpeanut
“Instead of the pat-down, you can always request to pat down your own scarf, including head and neck area, and have the officers perform a chemical swipe of your hands.”
Is this option available to ALL?
16
posted on
11/11/2010 5:32:37 PM PST
by
ViLaLuz
(2 Chronicles 7:14)
To: NYpeanut
...’’is because’’ of the F’ing Muslims THAT”S WHY!!! Thank you “Religion’ o’ Peace’’ thank you so f’ing much you 7th. century barbarians, thank you so bloody much!!
17
posted on
11/11/2010 5:44:53 PM PST
by
jmacusa
(Two wrongs don't make a right. But they can make it interesting.)
To: NYpeanut
Maybe we should exempt Muslims on religious and cultural grounds.
To: JoeFromSidney
if one chooses to dress like a terrorist ,then they should not be upset when treated like one!
19
posted on
11/11/2010 6:37:19 PM PST
by
omegadawn
(qualified)
To: NYpeanut
And all this enhanced security that CAIR finds "invasive and humiliating" is because... PC which is in overdrive already with the TSA types will go into ultra-sesitive mode. Only well dressed, clean cut, obviously not a threat type Caucasians will be groped if they opt out. Especially airline crew members.
20
posted on
11/11/2010 6:48:57 PM PST
by
BluH2o
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson