Like Sara but she’s a sure loser in a general election. If we want to make Obama a one-termer, we need a different nominee. (Romney and Huckabee are also fine, but near-sure loser. We need a fresh face.)
Sarah is the ONLY candidate who could beat Obama, but for the sake of transparency it must be admitted that Obama is not running for a second term, never intended to, doesn't need one.
That Cloward-Piven goal was to inflict the maximum amount of damage in the minimum amount of time.
MISSION ACCOMPLISHED.
Obama will be headed for Secretary-General of the United Nations by November 2012. His ineligibility for the position is irrelevant, as always.
.
> “Like Sara but she’s a sure loser in a general election. If we want to make Obama a one-termer, we need a different nominee”
.
Spoken like a true far left media hoot!
She has the highest rankings of any candidate; has the fullest grasp of every issue; has conveyed her positions articulately enough to spark massive outrage from the destroyers; how does that add up to a loser?
If its anyone but Palin, the country isn’t going to make it.
.
Sorry but that's just wrong headed thinking. Use Cali as an example. We continually put up squishy Republicans for state offices and we continually lose seats. The main reason Whitman lost was that she couldn't garner enthusiasm from her own party.
I used to think the way you're thinking....need to appeal to a broader range of voters... but no longer. If the dems are going to vote for someone with their own core values they aren't going to have an R after their name!
Please don't be fooled by this ploy to keep strong conservatives out of office. We are in the fight of our lives and we need to stick together and not let the opposition split us up.